Effectiveness of high intensity laser treatment in partial supraspinatus tendon tears: a randomised controlled trial.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Öznur Uzun, Emine Esra Bilir, Hilal Buse Arslan, Başak Şentürk, Özge Tezen
{"title":"Effectiveness of high intensity laser treatment in partial supraspinatus tendon tears: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Öznur Uzun, Emine Esra Bilir, Hilal Buse Arslan, Başak Şentürk, Özge Tezen","doi":"10.1007/s10103-025-04307-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The most common cause of rotator cuff injury is supraspinatus tendon tears (STTs). High-intensity laser therapy (HILT) has recently emerged as an important conservative treatment option. This study was designed as a randomised controlled trial in patients with partial STTs to compare the effects of HILT with those of ultrasound (US) therapy. Fifty patients between the ages of 18-75, who were diagnosed with partial STT were randomised into two groups using the closed envelope method. They were blinded to group assignment. Group-1 received 3-week HILT program. Group-2 received 3-week US therapy program. HILT and US therapy were carried out by the same physiotherapist. The primary outcome measure was VAS. Secondary outcome measures were Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and supraspinatus tendon thickness (SP) by ultrasonography. Nine patients dropped out of the study leaving 41 (Group-1, n = 20; Group-2, n = 21) patients for analysis. There was no significant difference between the groups before treatment in terms of age, body mass index values, gender, affected side, smoking, comorbidities, STT, VAS and SPADI values. VAS and SPADI values ​​decreased significantly in both groups at the 4th and 12th weeks. However, VAS and SPADI values ​​at the 4th and 12th weeks were significantly lower in the HILT group than in the US group. Cohen's d analysis revealed large effect sizes at the 4th and 12th weeks favoring the HILT group. There was no significant change in SP within and between groups at any time points. The findings show that HILT is superior to US treatment in reducing pain and improving function and quality of life in the long term. Both treatment methods did not affect SP. Clinical Trials ID: NCT06637410.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"40 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04307-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The most common cause of rotator cuff injury is supraspinatus tendon tears (STTs). High-intensity laser therapy (HILT) has recently emerged as an important conservative treatment option. This study was designed as a randomised controlled trial in patients with partial STTs to compare the effects of HILT with those of ultrasound (US) therapy. Fifty patients between the ages of 18-75, who were diagnosed with partial STT were randomised into two groups using the closed envelope method. They were blinded to group assignment. Group-1 received 3-week HILT program. Group-2 received 3-week US therapy program. HILT and US therapy were carried out by the same physiotherapist. The primary outcome measure was VAS. Secondary outcome measures were Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and supraspinatus tendon thickness (SP) by ultrasonography. Nine patients dropped out of the study leaving 41 (Group-1, n = 20; Group-2, n = 21) patients for analysis. There was no significant difference between the groups before treatment in terms of age, body mass index values, gender, affected side, smoking, comorbidities, STT, VAS and SPADI values. VAS and SPADI values ​​decreased significantly in both groups at the 4th and 12th weeks. However, VAS and SPADI values ​​at the 4th and 12th weeks were significantly lower in the HILT group than in the US group. Cohen's d analysis revealed large effect sizes at the 4th and 12th weeks favoring the HILT group. There was no significant change in SP within and between groups at any time points. The findings show that HILT is superior to US treatment in reducing pain and improving function and quality of life in the long term. Both treatment methods did not affect SP. Clinical Trials ID: NCT06637410.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lasers in Medical Science
Lasers in Medical Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics. The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信