Development and application of a machine learning-based antenatal depression prediction model

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Chunfei Hu , Hongmei Lin , Yupin Xu , Xukun Fu , Xiaojing Qiu , Siqian Hu , Tong Jin , Hualin Xu , Qiong Luo
{"title":"Development and application of a machine learning-based antenatal depression prediction model","authors":"Chunfei Hu ,&nbsp;Hongmei Lin ,&nbsp;Yupin Xu ,&nbsp;Xukun Fu ,&nbsp;Xiaojing Qiu ,&nbsp;Siqian Hu ,&nbsp;Tong Jin ,&nbsp;Hualin Xu ,&nbsp;Qiong Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.01.099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Antenatal depression (AND), occurring during pregnancy, is associated with severe outcomes. However, there is a lack of objective and universally applicable prediction methods for AND in clinical practice. We leveraged sociodemographic and pregnancy-related data to develop and validate a machine learning-based AND prediction model.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from 20,950 pregnant women form 3 hospitals were used and divided into training and test sets. AND was defined as an EPDS score of 10 or above. Using machine learning, we selected 34 characteristic variables and divided them into three categories based on clinical practice: Base Variables, General Variables, and Obstetric Variables. Based on this classification, we constructed four different AND random forest prediction models: the Base Model, the Base+General Model, the Base+Obstetric Model, and the Full Model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The AUC range in the test set was 0.687–0.710. The Base+General Model achieved the best performance with an AUC of 0.710 (95 % CI: 0.693–0.710) in predicting AND risk during the late pregnancy period. The AUC of the Base Model was only 0.022 lower than that of the top-performing model, indicating its solid foundation for early AND screening.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>We have only analyzed the dataset from two eastern cities, and have not yet validated our models in an external dataset.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Machine learning-based prediction models offer the capability to anticipate the risk of AND across different pregnancy stages. This enables the earlier and more accurate identification of pregnant women who may be at risk, facilitating timely interventions for improving outcomes for both mothers and their offspring.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":"375 ","pages":"Pages 137-147"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016503272500117X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Antenatal depression (AND), occurring during pregnancy, is associated with severe outcomes. However, there is a lack of objective and universally applicable prediction methods for AND in clinical practice. We leveraged sociodemographic and pregnancy-related data to develop and validate a machine learning-based AND prediction model.

Methods

Data from 20,950 pregnant women form 3 hospitals were used and divided into training and test sets. AND was defined as an EPDS score of 10 or above. Using machine learning, we selected 34 characteristic variables and divided them into three categories based on clinical practice: Base Variables, General Variables, and Obstetric Variables. Based on this classification, we constructed four different AND random forest prediction models: the Base Model, the Base+General Model, the Base+Obstetric Model, and the Full Model.

Results

The AUC range in the test set was 0.687–0.710. The Base+General Model achieved the best performance with an AUC of 0.710 (95 % CI: 0.693–0.710) in predicting AND risk during the late pregnancy period. The AUC of the Base Model was only 0.022 lower than that of the top-performing model, indicating its solid foundation for early AND screening.

Limitations

We have only analyzed the dataset from two eastern cities, and have not yet validated our models in an external dataset.

Conclusions

Machine learning-based prediction models offer the capability to anticipate the risk of AND across different pregnancy stages. This enables the earlier and more accurate identification of pregnant women who may be at risk, facilitating timely interventions for improving outcomes for both mothers and their offspring.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信