Gadopiclenol Enables Reduced Gadolinium Dose While Maintaining Quality of Pulmonary Arterial Enhancement for Pulmonary MRA: An Opportunity for Improved Safety and Sustainability.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Julius F Heidenreich, Sheena Y Chu, Jan-Peter Grunz, Jitka Starekova, Prashant Nagpal, Scott B Reeder, Thomas M Grist
{"title":"Gadopiclenol Enables Reduced Gadolinium Dose While Maintaining Quality of Pulmonary Arterial Enhancement for Pulmonary MRA: An Opportunity for Improved Safety and Sustainability.","authors":"Julius F Heidenreich, Sheena Y Chu, Jan-Peter Grunz, Jitka Starekova, Prashant Nagpal, Scott B Reeder, Thomas M Grist","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>Pulmonary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is an imaging method with proven utility for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism and avoids the need for ionizing radiation and iodinated contrast agents. High-relaxivity gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs), such as gadopiclenol, can be used to reduce the required gadolinium dose for pulmonary MRA. The aim of this study was to compare the contrast enhancement performance of gadopiclenol with an established gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced pulmonary MRA protocol.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective single-center study, data from 152 patients who underwent pulmonary MRA at 1.5 T were analyzed. Imaging was performed with either 0.05 mmol/kg gadopiclenol (n = 75) or 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine (n = 77), using dedicated multiphasic imaging protocols with precontrast, pulmonary arterial phase, immediate delayed phase, and a low flip-angle T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo acquisition. Subjective image quality evaluation was performed blinded by 2 radiologists on a 5-point Likert scale. For the estimation of interrater reliability, Cohen weighted κ was calculated. For semiquantitative assessment, signal intensities were measured in the pulmonary arteries, and relative signal enhancement was calculated. Data from groups were compared with Mann-Whitney U tests using Bonferroni corrections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Signal enhancement relative to precontrast in the first-pass pulmonary arterial phase was higher with 0.05 mmol/kg gadopiclenol compared with 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine (20.0-fold ± 5.6-fold vs 17.8-fold ± 5.8-fold; P = 0.015). Readers observed no difference in subjective rating in terms of intravascular contrast, peripheral vessel depiction, and diagnostic confidence with substantial interrater reliability (Cohen κ = 0.73 [95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.89], 0.65 [0.55-0.75], and 0.74 [0.65-0.84], all P's < 0.001). No severe adverse events were recorded for any clinical MRA examination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high-relaxivity contrast agent gadopiclenol can facilitate a reduction in gadolinium dose by 50% without compromising contrast enhancement for pulmonary MRA. This approach may enhance the safety and sustainability of pulmonary MRA in the long term.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001154","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: Pulmonary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is an imaging method with proven utility for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism and avoids the need for ionizing radiation and iodinated contrast agents. High-relaxivity gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs), such as gadopiclenol, can be used to reduce the required gadolinium dose for pulmonary MRA. The aim of this study was to compare the contrast enhancement performance of gadopiclenol with an established gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced pulmonary MRA protocol.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective single-center study, data from 152 patients who underwent pulmonary MRA at 1.5 T were analyzed. Imaging was performed with either 0.05 mmol/kg gadopiclenol (n = 75) or 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine (n = 77), using dedicated multiphasic imaging protocols with precontrast, pulmonary arterial phase, immediate delayed phase, and a low flip-angle T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo acquisition. Subjective image quality evaluation was performed blinded by 2 radiologists on a 5-point Likert scale. For the estimation of interrater reliability, Cohen weighted κ was calculated. For semiquantitative assessment, signal intensities were measured in the pulmonary arteries, and relative signal enhancement was calculated. Data from groups were compared with Mann-Whitney U tests using Bonferroni corrections.

Results: Signal enhancement relative to precontrast in the first-pass pulmonary arterial phase was higher with 0.05 mmol/kg gadopiclenol compared with 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine (20.0-fold ± 5.6-fold vs 17.8-fold ± 5.8-fold; P = 0.015). Readers observed no difference in subjective rating in terms of intravascular contrast, peripheral vessel depiction, and diagnostic confidence with substantial interrater reliability (Cohen κ = 0.73 [95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.89], 0.65 [0.55-0.75], and 0.74 [0.65-0.84], all P's < 0.001). No severe adverse events were recorded for any clinical MRA examination.

Conclusions: The high-relaxivity contrast agent gadopiclenol can facilitate a reduction in gadolinium dose by 50% without compromising contrast enhancement for pulmonary MRA. This approach may enhance the safety and sustainability of pulmonary MRA in the long term.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Investigative Radiology
Investigative Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
16.40%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信