Acute effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on rectus femoris muscle stiffness: a dose-response shear-wave elastography study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2025-01-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2024.1496825
Sara Kranjc, Mojca Fink, Masatoshi Nakamura, Žiga Kozinc
{"title":"Acute effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on rectus femoris muscle stiffness: a dose-response shear-wave elastography study.","authors":"Sara Kranjc, Mojca Fink, Masatoshi Nakamura, Žiga Kozinc","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2024.1496825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching is widely used to increase range of motion, but its underlying mechanisms are not well understood. This experimental, parallel group design study investigated the acute effects of PNF stretching on rectus femoris muscle stiffness and explored a potential dose-response relationship.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty healthy young adults (23 females, 7 males) were randomly assigned to either a PNF stretching group (n = 15; 22.96 ± 2.2 years) or a control group (n = 15; 23.3 ± 2.1 years). Rectus femoris stiffness was measured using shear-wave elastography (Resona 7, Mindray, China) at two locations (distal and proximal) before and after the second, fourth, and sixth sets of PNF stretching. The protocol involved six sets, each with three 10-s stretches and 5-s maximal contractions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicate that PNF stretching had no statistically significant effect on muscle stiffness, with no main effects of group (F = 0.05; <i>p</i> = 0.830) or time (F = 0.545; <i>p</i> = 0.653), and no significant interactions. However, the proximal location showed a substantially higher shear modulus compared to the distal location (F = 63.6; <i>p</i> < 0.001; η<sup>2</sup> = 0.69), independent of group or time.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings highlight a location-specific difference in muscle stiffness that was unaffected by the intervention. In conclusion, PNF stretching did not acutely reduce rectus femoris stiffness compared to passive rest, regardless of the number of stretching sets performed. Further research is needed to understand the muscle-specific effects of PNF stretching.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1496825"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11754182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1496825","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching is widely used to increase range of motion, but its underlying mechanisms are not well understood. This experimental, parallel group design study investigated the acute effects of PNF stretching on rectus femoris muscle stiffness and explored a potential dose-response relationship.

Methods: Thirty healthy young adults (23 females, 7 males) were randomly assigned to either a PNF stretching group (n = 15; 22.96 ± 2.2 years) or a control group (n = 15; 23.3 ± 2.1 years). Rectus femoris stiffness was measured using shear-wave elastography (Resona 7, Mindray, China) at two locations (distal and proximal) before and after the second, fourth, and sixth sets of PNF stretching. The protocol involved six sets, each with three 10-s stretches and 5-s maximal contractions.

Results: The results indicate that PNF stretching had no statistically significant effect on muscle stiffness, with no main effects of group (F = 0.05; p = 0.830) or time (F = 0.545; p = 0.653), and no significant interactions. However, the proximal location showed a substantially higher shear modulus compared to the distal location (F = 63.6; p < 0.001; η2 = 0.69), independent of group or time.

Discussion: These findings highlight a location-specific difference in muscle stiffness that was unaffected by the intervention. In conclusion, PNF stretching did not acutely reduce rectus femoris stiffness compared to passive rest, regardless of the number of stretching sets performed. Further research is needed to understand the muscle-specific effects of PNF stretching.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信