How Do Clinicians Use Quotations in Goals of Care Notes?

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.01.014
Gina M Piscitello, Ruthe Ali, Katrina Hauschildt, Jane Schell
{"title":"How Do Clinicians Use Quotations in Goals of Care Notes?","authors":"Gina M Piscitello, Ruthe Ali, Katrina Hauschildt, Jane Schell","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quoting patients in electronic medical record (EMR) notes is controversial. Quotations may be used to promote accuracy in documentation. However they also may be used to cast skepticism on patient speech. Little is known about how quotations are used in EMR notes documenting goal of care (GOC) conversations.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>1) How often are quotations used in GOC notes; 2) what content do clinicians quote; and 3) how does quotation use vary by clinician specialty and patient sociodemographic characteristics?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This multihospital, cross-sectional study assessed quotation use in GOC notes for seriously ill adult patients hospitalized between July-October 2021. Quotation frequency was evaluated and thematic analysis was used to assess the content of language quoted in GOC notes. The odds of quotation use by clinician specialty and patient sociodemographic group were determined using multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our review of 1003 GOC notes across fourteen hospitals found quotations were used in 32% of notes and were more often used by palliative clinicians when compared to non-palliative clinicians (38% vs. 21%, unadjusted OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.74-3.14, adjusted OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.66-4.13). Quotations were present more often in notes of Black versus White patients (41% vs. 30%, unadjusted OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.08-2.38, adjusted OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.11-2.71). The content of language included in quotations most often detailed patient feelings, family preferences, and patient discussion about death.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This multicenter study found quotations were used in almost one-third of GOC notes, were used more often used by palliative versus non-palliative clinicians and were present more often in notes for Black versus White patients. Future research must explore clinician intentions in using quotations and identify whether quotation use may contribute to racial disparities in patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.01.014","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Quoting patients in electronic medical record (EMR) notes is controversial. Quotations may be used to promote accuracy in documentation. However they also may be used to cast skepticism on patient speech. Little is known about how quotations are used in EMR notes documenting goal of care (GOC) conversations.

Research question: 1) How often are quotations used in GOC notes; 2) what content do clinicians quote; and 3) how does quotation use vary by clinician specialty and patient sociodemographic characteristics?

Study design and methods: This multihospital, cross-sectional study assessed quotation use in GOC notes for seriously ill adult patients hospitalized between July-October 2021. Quotation frequency was evaluated and thematic analysis was used to assess the content of language quoted in GOC notes. The odds of quotation use by clinician specialty and patient sociodemographic group were determined using multivariable logistic regression.

Results: Our review of 1003 GOC notes across fourteen hospitals found quotations were used in 32% of notes and were more often used by palliative clinicians when compared to non-palliative clinicians (38% vs. 21%, unadjusted OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.74-3.14, adjusted OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.66-4.13). Quotations were present more often in notes of Black versus White patients (41% vs. 30%, unadjusted OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.08-2.38, adjusted OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.11-2.71). The content of language included in quotations most often detailed patient feelings, family preferences, and patient discussion about death.

Conclusion: This multicenter study found quotations were used in almost one-third of GOC notes, were used more often used by palliative versus non-palliative clinicians and were present more often in notes for Black versus White patients. Future research must explore clinician intentions in using quotations and identify whether quotation use may contribute to racial disparities in patient care.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信