The implementation of a web-based diet quality screener as a self-management tool to improve the diet quality of adult patients with cardiovascular diseases.

IF 2.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Teuntje L de Smit, Iris van Damme, Anne I Slotegraaf, Tom van Loenhout, Johanna G Roos, Johanna M Geleijnse, Renate M Winkels
{"title":"The implementation of a web-based diet quality screener as a self-management tool to improve the diet quality of adult patients with cardiovascular diseases.","authors":"Teuntje L de Smit, Iris van Damme, Anne I Slotegraaf, Tom van Loenhout, Johanna G Roos, Johanna M Geleijnse, Renate M Winkels","doi":"10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.01.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & aims: </strong>Improving diet quality is a crucial aspect of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk management. However, in clinical practice, there is limited time to evaluate diet quality and to provide dietary advice. Patients therefore mostly depend on self-management to address their diet quality. This study aimed to investigate whether the web-based Eetscore tool could improve the diet quality of CVD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pre-posttest study with a duration of three months was performed in 65 (64 ± SD years) CVD patients. At baseline, participants were asked to complete the Eetscore: a brief web-based questionnaire to assess diet quality on a scale of 0-160 and provides dietary advice. Diet quality was assessed again after three months. The change in diet quality over time was assessed with a paired sample T-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average diet quality score at baseline was 102.5 ± 19.2 (95 % confidence interval (CI): 97.8; 107.3). Participants who completed both baseline and follow-up measurements (n = 41) showed no statistically significant changes in mean diet quality scores, with mean diet quality scores 101.9 at baseline and 103.4 after three months (95 %CI for change -2.7; 5.8, p = 0.74).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementation of Eetscore did not lead to significant improvements in diet quality of CVD patients over time. Participants mostly indicated that Eetscore provided insight into their diet quality, however this was not sufficient to induce dietary changes. We suggest that, in addition to a web-based tool, a healthcare professional emphasizing the importance of higher diet quality may be needed to improve the diet quality of CVD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10352,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","volume":" ","pages":"208-212"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.01.023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & aims: Improving diet quality is a crucial aspect of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk management. However, in clinical practice, there is limited time to evaluate diet quality and to provide dietary advice. Patients therefore mostly depend on self-management to address their diet quality. This study aimed to investigate whether the web-based Eetscore tool could improve the diet quality of CVD patients.

Methods: A pre-posttest study with a duration of three months was performed in 65 (64 ± SD years) CVD patients. At baseline, participants were asked to complete the Eetscore: a brief web-based questionnaire to assess diet quality on a scale of 0-160 and provides dietary advice. Diet quality was assessed again after three months. The change in diet quality over time was assessed with a paired sample T-test.

Results: The average diet quality score at baseline was 102.5 ± 19.2 (95 % confidence interval (CI): 97.8; 107.3). Participants who completed both baseline and follow-up measurements (n = 41) showed no statistically significant changes in mean diet quality scores, with mean diet quality scores 101.9 at baseline and 103.4 after three months (95 %CI for change -2.7; 5.8, p = 0.74).

Conclusion: Implementation of Eetscore did not lead to significant improvements in diet quality of CVD patients over time. Participants mostly indicated that Eetscore provided insight into their diet quality, however this was not sufficient to induce dietary changes. We suggest that, in addition to a web-based tool, a healthcare professional emphasizing the importance of higher diet quality may be needed to improve the diet quality of CVD patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical nutrition ESPEN
Clinical nutrition ESPEN NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.30%
发文量
512
期刊介绍: Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is an electronic-only journal and is an official publication of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN). Nutrition and nutritional care have gained wide clinical and scientific interest during the past decades. The increasing knowledge of metabolic disturbances and nutritional assessment in chronic and acute diseases has stimulated rapid advances in design, development and clinical application of nutritional support. The aims of ESPEN are to encourage the rapid diffusion of knowledge and its application in the field of clinical nutrition and metabolism. Published bimonthly, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN focuses on publishing articles on the relationship between nutrition and disease in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is available to all members of ESPEN and to all subscribers of Clinical Nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信