Understanding social behaviours across neurodiverse young people: roles of social cognition and self-regulation.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
BJPsych Open Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1192/bjo.2024.831
Iciar Iturmendi-Sabater, Evdokia Anagnostou, Marc A Fournier, Jennifer Crosbie, Russell Schachar, Robert Nicolson, Stelios Georgiadis, Elizabeth Kelley, Jessica Jones, Jessica Brian, Hsiang-Yuan Lin, Meng-Chuan Lai
{"title":"Understanding social behaviours across neurodiverse young people: roles of social cognition and self-regulation.","authors":"Iciar Iturmendi-Sabater, Evdokia Anagnostou, Marc A Fournier, Jennifer Crosbie, Russell Schachar, Robert Nicolson, Stelios Georgiadis, Elizabeth Kelley, Jessica Jones, Jessica Brian, Hsiang-Yuan Lin, Meng-Chuan Lai","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Differences in social behaviours are common in young people with neurodevelopmental conditions (NDCs). Recent research challenges the long-standing hypothesis that difficulties in social cognition explain social behaviour differences.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We examined how difficulties regulating one's behaviour, emotions and thoughts to adapt to environmental demands (i.e. dysregulation), alongside social cognition, explain social behaviours across neurodiverse young people.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We analysed cross-sectional behavioural and cognitive data of 646 6- to 18-year-old typically developing young people and those with NDCs from the Province of Ontario Neurodevelopmental Network. Social behaviours and dysregulation were measured by the caregiver-reported Adaptive Behavior Assessment System Social domain and Child Behavior Checklist Dysregulation Profile, respectively. Social cognition was assessed by the Neuropsychological Assessment Affect-Recognition and Theory-of-Mind, Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, and Sandbox continuous false-belief task scores. We split the sample into training (<i>n</i> = 324) and test (<i>n</i> = 322) sets. We investigated how social cognition and dysregulation explained social behaviours through principal component regression and hierarchical regression in the training set. We tested social cognition-by-dysregulation interactions, and whether dysregulation mediated the social cognition-social behaviours association. We assessed model fits in the test set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two social cognition components adequately explained social behaviours (13.88%). Lower dysregulation further explained better social behaviours (<i>β</i> = -0.163, 95% CI -0.191 to -0.134). Social cognition-by-dysregulation interaction was non-significant (<i>β</i> = -0.001, 95% CI -0.023 to 0.021). Dysregulation partially mediated the social cognition-social behaviours association (total effect: 0.544, 95% CI 0.370-0.695). Findings were replicated in the test set.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-regulation, beyond social cognition, substantially explains social behaviours across neurodiverse young people.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"e22"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822952/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.831","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Differences in social behaviours are common in young people with neurodevelopmental conditions (NDCs). Recent research challenges the long-standing hypothesis that difficulties in social cognition explain social behaviour differences.

Aims: We examined how difficulties regulating one's behaviour, emotions and thoughts to adapt to environmental demands (i.e. dysregulation), alongside social cognition, explain social behaviours across neurodiverse young people.

Method: We analysed cross-sectional behavioural and cognitive data of 646 6- to 18-year-old typically developing young people and those with NDCs from the Province of Ontario Neurodevelopmental Network. Social behaviours and dysregulation were measured by the caregiver-reported Adaptive Behavior Assessment System Social domain and Child Behavior Checklist Dysregulation Profile, respectively. Social cognition was assessed by the Neuropsychological Assessment Affect-Recognition and Theory-of-Mind, Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, and Sandbox continuous false-belief task scores. We split the sample into training (n = 324) and test (n = 322) sets. We investigated how social cognition and dysregulation explained social behaviours through principal component regression and hierarchical regression in the training set. We tested social cognition-by-dysregulation interactions, and whether dysregulation mediated the social cognition-social behaviours association. We assessed model fits in the test set.

Results: Two social cognition components adequately explained social behaviours (13.88%). Lower dysregulation further explained better social behaviours (β = -0.163, 95% CI -0.191 to -0.134). Social cognition-by-dysregulation interaction was non-significant (β = -0.001, 95% CI -0.023 to 0.021). Dysregulation partially mediated the social cognition-social behaviours association (total effect: 0.544, 95% CI 0.370-0.695). Findings were replicated in the test set.

Conclusions: Self-regulation, beyond social cognition, substantially explains social behaviours across neurodiverse young people.

理解神经多样性年轻人的社会行为:社会认知和自我调节的作用。
背景:社会行为差异在患有神经发育疾病(ndc)的年轻人中很常见。最近的研究挑战了社会认知困难解释社会行为差异的长期假设。目的:我们研究了调节一个人的行为、情绪和思想以适应环境需求(即调节失调)的困难,以及社会认知,如何解释神经多样性年轻人的社会行为。方法:我们分析了来自安大略省神经发育网络的646名6- 18岁典型发展年轻人和ndc患者的横截面行为和认知数据。社会行为和失调分别由照顾者报告的适应行为评估系统社会领域和儿童行为检查表失调档案测量。社会认知采用神经心理学评估——情感识别和心理理论、眼读心性测试和沙盒连续错误信念任务得分进行评估。我们将样本分成训练集(n = 324)和测试集(n = 322)。我们通过主成分回归和层次回归研究了社会认知和失调如何解释社会行为。我们测试了社会认知与失调的相互作用,以及失调是否介导了社会认知与社会行为的关联。我们在测试集中评估模型的拟合。结果:两个社会认知成分充分解释了社会行为(13.88%)。更低的失调进一步解释了更好的社会行为(β = -0.163, 95% CI -0.191至-0.134)。社会认知失调相互作用不显著(β = -0.001, 95% CI -0.023 ~ 0.021)。失调部分介导了社会认知-社会行为的关联(总效应:0.544,95% CI 0.370-0.695)。结果在测试集中得到了重复。结论:超越社会认知的自我调节从本质上解释了神经多样性年轻人的社会行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信