Apparent diffusion coefficient values in differentiating benign and malignant thoracic masses in children and young adults.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Acta radiologica Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1177/02841851241312220
Hyun Ji Lim, Haesung Yoon, Jisoo Kim, Hye-Jeong Lee, Young Han Lee, Mi-Jung Lee
{"title":"Apparent diffusion coefficient values in differentiating benign and malignant thoracic masses in children and young adults.","authors":"Hyun Ji Lim, Haesung Yoon, Jisoo Kim, Hye-Jeong Lee, Young Han Lee, Mi-Jung Lee","doi":"10.1177/02841851241312220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundIn children and young adults, tumors in the chest and thoracic wall exhibit a wide variety of types, making it challenging to differentiate between benign and malignant cases before invasive histopathological examination.PurposeTo evaluate the utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for discriminating malignant thoracic masses in children and young adults.Material and MethodsThis retrospective study included chest magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in patients aged <30 years. Patients' age and sex, tumor location (mediastinum or thoracic wall), tumor size, MR characteristics including necrosis or hemorrhage, and ADC values were assessed.ResultsMalignant masses were found in older patients (mean age = 18.0 ± 8.1 vs. 10.6, ± 9.1 years; <i>P</i> = 0.008), had lower mean ADC values (0.765 ± 0.298 vs. 2.051 ± 0.855 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and showed more internal hemorrhage (6/12 vs. 17/86; <i>P</i> = 0.031) compared to benign masses. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses also showed significant differences in age, tumor size, and ADC values. In the diagnostic performance analysis, age (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.723, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.624-0.809; <i>P</i> = 0.004) and ADC mean value (AUC = 0.941, 95% CI = 0.874-0.978, <i>P</i> < 0.001) were significant. The optimal cutoff values were 13 years for age (sensitivity = 83.3%, specificity = 61.6%) and an ADC mean of 1.196 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm²/s (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 86.1%) for discriminating malignant from benign thoracic masses.ConclusionWhen evaluating thoracic masses in children and young adults, older age and lower ADC values help identify malignancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"393-400"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241312220","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundIn children and young adults, tumors in the chest and thoracic wall exhibit a wide variety of types, making it challenging to differentiate between benign and malignant cases before invasive histopathological examination.PurposeTo evaluate the utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for discriminating malignant thoracic masses in children and young adults.Material and MethodsThis retrospective study included chest magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in patients aged <30 years. Patients' age and sex, tumor location (mediastinum or thoracic wall), tumor size, MR characteristics including necrosis or hemorrhage, and ADC values were assessed.ResultsMalignant masses were found in older patients (mean age = 18.0 ± 8.1 vs. 10.6, ± 9.1 years; P = 0.008), had lower mean ADC values (0.765 ± 0.298 vs. 2.051 ± 0.855 × 10-3 mm2/s; P < 0.001), and showed more internal hemorrhage (6/12 vs. 17/86; P = 0.031) compared to benign masses. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses also showed significant differences in age, tumor size, and ADC values. In the diagnostic performance analysis, age (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.723, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.624-0.809; P = 0.004) and ADC mean value (AUC = 0.941, 95% CI = 0.874-0.978, P < 0.001) were significant. The optimal cutoff values were 13 years for age (sensitivity = 83.3%, specificity = 61.6%) and an ADC mean of 1.196 × 10-3 mm²/s (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 86.1%) for discriminating malignant from benign thoracic masses.ConclusionWhen evaluating thoracic masses in children and young adults, older age and lower ADC values help identify malignancy.

视扩散系数在鉴别儿童和青年胸椎良恶性肿块中的价值。
背景:在儿童和年轻人中,胸部和胸壁的肿瘤表现出多种类型,这使得在有创组织病理学检查之前区分良性和恶性病例具有挑战性。目的:探讨视扩散系数(ADC)在鉴别儿童和青少年胸部恶性肿块中的应用价值。材料和方法:本回顾性研究包括老年患者的胸部磁共振成像(MRI)扫描结果:老年患者发现恶性肿块(平均年龄= 18.0±8.1 vs. 10.6,±9.1岁;P = 0.008),平均ADC值较低(0.765±0.298比2.051±0.855 × 10-3 mm2/s;P = 0.031)。单因素和多因素回归分析也显示了年龄、肿瘤大小和ADC值的显著差异。在诊断性能分析中,年龄(受试者工作特征曲线下面积[AUC] = 0.723, 95%可信区间[CI] = 0.624-0.809;P = 0.004)和ADC平均值(AUC = 0.941, 95% CI = 0.874-0.978, P -3 mm²/s(敏感性= 100%,特异性= 86.1%)用于区分胸部肿块的良恶性。结论:在评估儿童和年轻人的胸部肿块时,年龄较大和ADC值较低有助于识别恶性肿瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信