Kendrin R Sonneville, Natasha A Schvey, Heidi M Weeks, Michelle E Clayson, Katherine W Bauer
{"title":"Parental Weight Stigma Associated with Self-Directed Weight Talk and Use of Health-Related Restrictive Feeding Practices.","authors":"Kendrin R Sonneville, Natasha A Schvey, Heidi M Weeks, Michelle E Clayson, Katherine W Bauer","doi":"10.1016/j.jand.2025.01.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Parents are important conduits of weight- and health-related messaging. Weight-related communication and approaches to child feeding used by parents may reflect their past experiences with weight stigma and are understudied pathways through which intergenerational weight stigma may be transmitted.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine how experienced and internalized weight stigma among parents of children with higher weights are associated with weight-related communication and the feeding practices they use.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The Listening to Parents study is a cross-sectional study of 103 parent-child dyads who completed in-person study visits at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan between November 2022 through June 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants/setting: </strong>Participants were parents of children (ages 6 to 14 years, identified by parents as \"heavier or overweight\") who completed the Stigmatizing Situations Inventory Brief (SSI-B) and Weight Bias Internalization Scale-Modified (WBIS-M), as well as questions about weight-related communication and the Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire (CFPQ).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Outcomes included 5 items corresponding to parental weight-related communication (self-directed, other-directed, and child-directed weight talk, child-directed weight teasing, and child-directed encouragement to lose weight) and 3 CFPQ subscales (Monitoring, Restriction for Health, and Restriction for Weight Control).</p><p><strong>Statistical analyses performed: </strong>Linear regression models were used to examine associations between mean scored parent- experienced and parent-internalized weight stigma and weight-related communication and feeding practices. Models were adjusted for child gender, parent-perceived child weight status, parental race/ethnicity, parental body mass index, and household income-to-needs ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In covariate-adjusted models, parent-internalized weight stigma was positively associated with self-directed weight talk (β=0.20, SE=0.078, p=0.01) and greater use of health-related restrictive child feeding practices (β=0.16, SE=0.070, p=0.02). No other significant associations in covariate-adjusted models were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While parents with greater internalized weight stigma may engage in more self-directed weight talk, they may also be more attuned to the harms of weight stigma and seek to minimize child-directed weight talk and weight teasing.</p>","PeriodicalId":379,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2025.01.012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Parents are important conduits of weight- and health-related messaging. Weight-related communication and approaches to child feeding used by parents may reflect their past experiences with weight stigma and are understudied pathways through which intergenerational weight stigma may be transmitted.
Objective: To examine how experienced and internalized weight stigma among parents of children with higher weights are associated with weight-related communication and the feeding practices they use.
Design: The Listening to Parents study is a cross-sectional study of 103 parent-child dyads who completed in-person study visits at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan between November 2022 through June 2023.
Participants/setting: Participants were parents of children (ages 6 to 14 years, identified by parents as "heavier or overweight") who completed the Stigmatizing Situations Inventory Brief (SSI-B) and Weight Bias Internalization Scale-Modified (WBIS-M), as well as questions about weight-related communication and the Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire (CFPQ).
Main outcome measures: Outcomes included 5 items corresponding to parental weight-related communication (self-directed, other-directed, and child-directed weight talk, child-directed weight teasing, and child-directed encouragement to lose weight) and 3 CFPQ subscales (Monitoring, Restriction for Health, and Restriction for Weight Control).
Statistical analyses performed: Linear regression models were used to examine associations between mean scored parent- experienced and parent-internalized weight stigma and weight-related communication and feeding practices. Models were adjusted for child gender, parent-perceived child weight status, parental race/ethnicity, parental body mass index, and household income-to-needs ratio.
Results: In covariate-adjusted models, parent-internalized weight stigma was positively associated with self-directed weight talk (β=0.20, SE=0.078, p=0.01) and greater use of health-related restrictive child feeding practices (β=0.16, SE=0.070, p=0.02). No other significant associations in covariate-adjusted models were observed.
Conclusions: While parents with greater internalized weight stigma may engage in more self-directed weight talk, they may also be more attuned to the harms of weight stigma and seek to minimize child-directed weight talk and weight teasing.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is the premier source for the practice and science of food, nutrition, and dietetics. The monthly, peer-reviewed journal presents original articles prepared by scholars and practitioners and is the most widely read professional publication in the field. The Journal focuses on advancing professional knowledge across the range of research and practice issues such as: nutritional science, medical nutrition therapy, public health nutrition, food science and biotechnology, foodservice systems, leadership and management, and dietetics education.