Distal tibial fractures fixation using retrograde tibial intramedullary nail in high-risk patients: a retrospective study.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
H Liu, W Xu, Y Xiong, J Zhang, D Luo, J Wu
{"title":"Distal tibial fractures fixation using retrograde tibial intramedullary nail in high-risk patients: a retrospective study.","authors":"H Liu, W Xu, Y Xiong, J Zhang, D Luo, J Wu","doi":"10.52628/90.3.12760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Distal tibial fractures are common lower-limb injuries and are generally associated with a high risk of postoperative complications, especially in patients with multiple medical comorbidities. This study sought to ascertain the efficacy of retrograde intramedullary tibial nails (RTN) for treating extra-articular distal tibial fractures in high-risk patients. Between January 2019 and December 2021, 13 patients considered at high risk for postoperative complications underwent RTN fixation. Comorbidities in the patient sample included diabetes, renal disease, hypertension, severe osteoporosis, hemorrhagic blisters, long-term smoking, alcoholism and so on. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed to assess treatment data, wound complications, infections, hardware failure, time to bone union, and functional outcomes. The mean preoperative waiting time and operation duration was 7.1 ± 1.7 days and 61.1 ± 7.1 minutes, respectively. The hospital stay time ranged from 10 to 16 days, with a mean of 12.6 ± 1.9 days. All patients were monitored for a mean follow-up time of 17.5 ± 3.3 months. All patients achieved fracture union with an average healing time of 5.0 ± 0.7 months. No implant failure or persistent pain was observed in the surgical site. Two patients had superficial infection, but no further complications resulted from the incision. At the final follow-up, the average AOFAS score was 84.0 ± 7.3 points, with an excellent and good rate of 76.9%. RTN appears to be a reliable treatment option for extra-articular distal tibial fractures in high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7018,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","volume":"90 3","pages":"559-565"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52628/90.3.12760","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Distal tibial fractures are common lower-limb injuries and are generally associated with a high risk of postoperative complications, especially in patients with multiple medical comorbidities. This study sought to ascertain the efficacy of retrograde intramedullary tibial nails (RTN) for treating extra-articular distal tibial fractures in high-risk patients. Between January 2019 and December 2021, 13 patients considered at high risk for postoperative complications underwent RTN fixation. Comorbidities in the patient sample included diabetes, renal disease, hypertension, severe osteoporosis, hemorrhagic blisters, long-term smoking, alcoholism and so on. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed to assess treatment data, wound complications, infections, hardware failure, time to bone union, and functional outcomes. The mean preoperative waiting time and operation duration was 7.1 ± 1.7 days and 61.1 ± 7.1 minutes, respectively. The hospital stay time ranged from 10 to 16 days, with a mean of 12.6 ± 1.9 days. All patients were monitored for a mean follow-up time of 17.5 ± 3.3 months. All patients achieved fracture union with an average healing time of 5.0 ± 0.7 months. No implant failure or persistent pain was observed in the surgical site. Two patients had superficial infection, but no further complications resulted from the incision. At the final follow-up, the average AOFAS score was 84.0 ± 7.3 points, with an excellent and good rate of 76.9%. RTN appears to be a reliable treatment option for extra-articular distal tibial fractures in high-risk patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta orthopaedica Belgica
Acta orthopaedica Belgica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信