Effects of online teacher professional development on teacher-, classroom-, and student-level outcomes: A meta-analysis

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Fitore Morina , Tim Fütterer , Nicolas Hübner , Steffen Zitzmann , Christian Fischer
{"title":"Effects of online teacher professional development on teacher-, classroom-, and student-level outcomes: A meta-analysis","authors":"Fitore Morina ,&nbsp;Tim Fütterer ,&nbsp;Nicolas Hübner ,&nbsp;Steffen Zitzmann ,&nbsp;Christian Fischer","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Teachers' professional development is crucial for effective classroom practice. Due to its advantages, many teachers have participated in online professional development (OPD) in recent years. Numerous studies have investigated the participation and effect of first to 12th grade in-service teachers' OPD participation on the teacher, classroom practice, or student level. However, a comprehensive meta-analysis of these studies is missing. This meta-analysis summarizes findings from 102 quantitative studies with a pre-posttest design. The results indicate medium effects of OPD participation on the teacher level (Hedges' <em>g</em> = 0.71) and on the classroom level (Hedges' <em>g</em> = 0.55) and a small effect on the student level (Hedges' <em>g</em> = 0.19). We included Desimones' (2009) core features of effective PD participation as moderators. We found that the core feature of collective participation positively influenced the effect size of the classroom level. Furthermore, we found that studies that employed a control-group design reported significantly lower effect sizes on teacher-level outcomes than studies that used a within-subject design. On the student's level, studies with asynchronous OPD reported significantly smaller effect sizes than studies with a synchronous OPD format. Our results aim to provide research, policymakers, educational stakeholders, and teachers with the clarity that OPD is effective on several levels and should, therefore, be encouraged.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"228 ","pages":"Article 105247"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131525000156","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teachers' professional development is crucial for effective classroom practice. Due to its advantages, many teachers have participated in online professional development (OPD) in recent years. Numerous studies have investigated the participation and effect of first to 12th grade in-service teachers' OPD participation on the teacher, classroom practice, or student level. However, a comprehensive meta-analysis of these studies is missing. This meta-analysis summarizes findings from 102 quantitative studies with a pre-posttest design. The results indicate medium effects of OPD participation on the teacher level (Hedges' g = 0.71) and on the classroom level (Hedges' g = 0.55) and a small effect on the student level (Hedges' g = 0.19). We included Desimones' (2009) core features of effective PD participation as moderators. We found that the core feature of collective participation positively influenced the effect size of the classroom level. Furthermore, we found that studies that employed a control-group design reported significantly lower effect sizes on teacher-level outcomes than studies that used a within-subject design. On the student's level, studies with asynchronous OPD reported significantly smaller effect sizes than studies with a synchronous OPD format. Our results aim to provide research, policymakers, educational stakeholders, and teachers with the clarity that OPD is effective on several levels and should, therefore, be encouraged.
在线教师专业发展对教师、课堂和学生水平结果的影响:一项元分析
教师的专业发展对有效的课堂实践至关重要。由于其优势,近年来许多教师参与了在线专业发展(OPD)。许多研究调查了一至十二年级在职教师参与OPD对教师、课堂实践或学生水平的影响。然而,缺乏对这些研究的综合荟萃分析。本荟萃分析总结了102项采用前-后测试设计的定量研究的结果。结果表明,OPD参与对教师水平(Hedges' g = 0.71)和课堂水平(Hedges' g = 0.55)的影响中等,对学生水平的影响较小(Hedges' g = 0.19)。我们将Desimones(2009)的有效PD参与的核心特征作为调节因素。我们发现,集体参与的核心特征正向影响课堂水平的效应量。此外,我们发现采用对照组设计的研究报告的教师水平结果的效应量明显低于使用主题内设计的研究。在学生的水平上,异步OPD的研究报告的效应值明显小于同步OPD格式的研究。我们的研究结果旨在为研究人员、政策制定者、教育利益相关者和教师提供清晰的信息,即OPD在几个层面上都是有效的,因此应该得到鼓励。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信