Fitore Morina , Tim Fütterer , Nicolas Hübner , Steffen Zitzmann , Christian Fischer
{"title":"Effects of online teacher professional development on teacher-, classroom-, and student-level outcomes: A meta-analysis","authors":"Fitore Morina , Tim Fütterer , Nicolas Hübner , Steffen Zitzmann , Christian Fischer","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Teachers' professional development is crucial for effective classroom practice. Due to its advantages, many teachers have participated in online professional development (OPD) in recent years. Numerous studies have investigated the participation and effect of first to 12th grade in-service teachers' OPD participation on the teacher, classroom practice, or student level. However, a comprehensive meta-analysis of these studies is missing. This meta-analysis summarizes findings from 102 quantitative studies with a pre-posttest design. The results indicate medium effects of OPD participation on the teacher level (Hedges' <em>g</em> = 0.71) and on the classroom level (Hedges' <em>g</em> = 0.55) and a small effect on the student level (Hedges' <em>g</em> = 0.19). We included Desimones' (2009) core features of effective PD participation as moderators. We found that the core feature of collective participation positively influenced the effect size of the classroom level. Furthermore, we found that studies that employed a control-group design reported significantly lower effect sizes on teacher-level outcomes than studies that used a within-subject design. On the student's level, studies with asynchronous OPD reported significantly smaller effect sizes than studies with a synchronous OPD format. Our results aim to provide research, policymakers, educational stakeholders, and teachers with the clarity that OPD is effective on several levels and should, therefore, be encouraged.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"228 ","pages":"Article 105247"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131525000156","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Teachers' professional development is crucial for effective classroom practice. Due to its advantages, many teachers have participated in online professional development (OPD) in recent years. Numerous studies have investigated the participation and effect of first to 12th grade in-service teachers' OPD participation on the teacher, classroom practice, or student level. However, a comprehensive meta-analysis of these studies is missing. This meta-analysis summarizes findings from 102 quantitative studies with a pre-posttest design. The results indicate medium effects of OPD participation on the teacher level (Hedges' g = 0.71) and on the classroom level (Hedges' g = 0.55) and a small effect on the student level (Hedges' g = 0.19). We included Desimones' (2009) core features of effective PD participation as moderators. We found that the core feature of collective participation positively influenced the effect size of the classroom level. Furthermore, we found that studies that employed a control-group design reported significantly lower effect sizes on teacher-level outcomes than studies that used a within-subject design. On the student's level, studies with asynchronous OPD reported significantly smaller effect sizes than studies with a synchronous OPD format. Our results aim to provide research, policymakers, educational stakeholders, and teachers with the clarity that OPD is effective on several levels and should, therefore, be encouraged.
教师的专业发展对有效的课堂实践至关重要。由于其优势,近年来许多教师参与了在线专业发展(OPD)。许多研究调查了一至十二年级在职教师参与OPD对教师、课堂实践或学生水平的影响。然而,缺乏对这些研究的综合荟萃分析。本荟萃分析总结了102项采用前-后测试设计的定量研究的结果。结果表明,OPD参与对教师水平(Hedges' g = 0.71)和课堂水平(Hedges' g = 0.55)的影响中等,对学生水平的影响较小(Hedges' g = 0.19)。我们将Desimones(2009)的有效PD参与的核心特征作为调节因素。我们发现,集体参与的核心特征正向影响课堂水平的效应量。此外,我们发现采用对照组设计的研究报告的教师水平结果的效应量明显低于使用主题内设计的研究。在学生的水平上,异步OPD的研究报告的效应值明显小于同步OPD格式的研究。我们的研究结果旨在为研究人员、政策制定者、教育利益相关者和教师提供清晰的信息,即OPD在几个层面上都是有效的,因此应该得到鼓励。
期刊介绍:
Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.