Vegetation Types Shift Physiological and Phenological Controls on Carbon Sink Strength in a Coastal Zone

IF 12 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Siyu Wei, Adina Paytan, Xiaojing Chu, Xiaoshuai Zhang, Weimin Song, Xiaojie Wang, Peiguang Li, Guangxuan Han
{"title":"Vegetation Types Shift Physiological and Phenological Controls on Carbon Sink Strength in a Coastal Zone","authors":"Siyu Wei,&nbsp;Adina Paytan,&nbsp;Xiaojing Chu,&nbsp;Xiaoshuai Zhang,&nbsp;Weimin Song,&nbsp;Xiaojie Wang,&nbsp;Peiguang Li,&nbsp;Guangxuan Han","doi":"10.1111/gcb.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The carbon sink function performed by the different vegetation types along the environmental gradient in coastal zones plays a vital role in mitigating climate change. However, inadequate understanding of its spatiotemporal variations across different vegetation types and associated regulatory mechanisms hampers determining its potential shifts in a changing climate. Here, we present long-term (2011–2022) eddy covariance measurements of the net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of CO<sub>2</sub> at three sites with different vegetation types (tidal wetland, nontidal wetland, and cropland) in a coastal zone to examine the role of vegetation type on annual carbon sink strength. We found that the three study sites are stable carbon sinks and are influenced by their distinct physiological and phenological factors. The annual NEE of the tidal wetland, nontidal wetland, and cropland were determined predominantly by the seasonal peaks of net CO<sub>2</sub> uptake, release, and duration of CO<sub>2</sub> uptake period. Furthermore, the changes in annual NEE were sensitive to climatic variables, as spring mean air temperature reduced the carbon sink strength in the tidal wetland, maximum daily precipitation in summer reduced it in the nontidal wetland, and summer mean global radiation elicited the same effect in the cropland. Finally, a worldwide database of the three vegetation types was compiled, using which we further validated the global consistency of the biological controls. Overall, these results emphasize the importance of considering the underlying mechanisms by which vegetation types influence NEE for the accurate forecasting of carbon sink dynamics across different coastal vegetation types under climate change.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70029","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The carbon sink function performed by the different vegetation types along the environmental gradient in coastal zones plays a vital role in mitigating climate change. However, inadequate understanding of its spatiotemporal variations across different vegetation types and associated regulatory mechanisms hampers determining its potential shifts in a changing climate. Here, we present long-term (2011–2022) eddy covariance measurements of the net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of CO2 at three sites with different vegetation types (tidal wetland, nontidal wetland, and cropland) in a coastal zone to examine the role of vegetation type on annual carbon sink strength. We found that the three study sites are stable carbon sinks and are influenced by their distinct physiological and phenological factors. The annual NEE of the tidal wetland, nontidal wetland, and cropland were determined predominantly by the seasonal peaks of net CO2 uptake, release, and duration of CO2 uptake period. Furthermore, the changes in annual NEE were sensitive to climatic variables, as spring mean air temperature reduced the carbon sink strength in the tidal wetland, maximum daily precipitation in summer reduced it in the nontidal wetland, and summer mean global radiation elicited the same effect in the cropland. Finally, a worldwide database of the three vegetation types was compiled, using which we further validated the global consistency of the biological controls. Overall, these results emphasize the importance of considering the underlying mechanisms by which vegetation types influence NEE for the accurate forecasting of carbon sink dynamics across different coastal vegetation types under climate change.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

海岸带植被类型变化对碳汇强度的生理和物候控制
海岸带不同植被类型沿环境梯度的碳汇功能对减缓气候变化具有重要作用。然而,对其在不同植被类型间的时空变化及其相关调控机制的认识不足,阻碍了确定其在气候变化中的潜在变化。本文通过2011-2022年对海岸带3个不同植被类型(潮汐湿地、非潮汐湿地和农田)的净生态系统交换(NEE)进行长期(2011-2022年)涡动相关测量,探讨植被类型对年碳汇强度的影响。研究发现,这三个研究点都是稳定的碳汇,并受其不同的生理和物候因素影响。潮地湿地、非潮地湿地和农田的年净NEE主要由CO2净吸收、释放的季节峰值和CO2吸收期的持续时间决定。此外,年NEE的变化对气候变量较为敏感,春季平均气温降低了潮地湿地的碳汇强度,夏季最大日降水量降低了非潮地湿地的碳汇强度,夏季平均全球辐射对农田的碳汇强度也有相同的影响。最后,建立了三种植被类型的全球数据库,进一步验证了生物防治的全球一致性。总的来说,这些结果强调了考虑植被类型影响NEE的潜在机制对于准确预测气候变化下不同沿海植被类型碳汇动态的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信