Understanding Staff Needs for Improving End-Of-Life Care in Critical Care Units: A Qualitative Focus Group Analysis and Service Evaluation.

Simon Tavabie, Stephen Pearson, Janet Balabanovic, Anna Batho, Manoj Juj, Priscilla Kastande, Joanne Bennetts, Emily Collis, Tim Bonnici
{"title":"Understanding Staff Needs for Improving End-Of-Life Care in Critical Care Units: A Qualitative Focus Group Analysis and Service Evaluation.","authors":"Simon Tavabie, Stephen Pearson, Janet Balabanovic, Anna Batho, Manoj Juj, Priscilla Kastande, Joanne Bennetts, Emily Collis, Tim Bonnici","doi":"10.1177/10499091251316492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Critical care is a place of frequent death, up to a quarter of those admitted die during admission. Caring for dying people provides many challenges, practically, professionally and personally. The aim of this study was to better understand the perspectives of staff caring for dying people in critical care and identify their priorities for improvement. <b>Method:</b> Three multidisciplinary focus groups of critical care staff at a large central London hospitals trust were facilitated with a semi structured format and digitally transcribed. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted to extract themes. <b>Results:</b> N = 34 (18 nursing, 7 allied health professionals, 6 medical, 3 clerical/administrative). The five themes were structured as priority statements: \"We need to recognise\" included the subthemes of being \"sick enough to die\" and potential rapid deteriorations in this setting; \"We need to understand\" with subthemes of perspectives on dying and prioritising time for conversations; \"We need to connect\" with subthemes of therapeutic relationship and physical presence; \"We need to collaborate\" with subthemes of critical care working and empowerment, and cross teams working; \"We need support\" with themes of experiencing support and making time to support others. <b>Conclusion:</b> We present an approach to identifying critical care departmental priorities for an end-of-life care improvement programme. The themes extracted will be used to evaluate systems for dying in critical care, aiming to empower staff to provide excellent care every time they look after a dying person. <b>Relevance to Practice:</b> This service evaluation identifies key priorities among critical care staff regarding end-of-life care. The insights can guide service improvements, such as tailored training and enhanced support for staff, to ensure better communication, collaboration, and quality care for patients at the end of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"10499091251316492"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251316492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Critical care is a place of frequent death, up to a quarter of those admitted die during admission. Caring for dying people provides many challenges, practically, professionally and personally. The aim of this study was to better understand the perspectives of staff caring for dying people in critical care and identify their priorities for improvement. Method: Three multidisciplinary focus groups of critical care staff at a large central London hospitals trust were facilitated with a semi structured format and digitally transcribed. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted to extract themes. Results: N = 34 (18 nursing, 7 allied health professionals, 6 medical, 3 clerical/administrative). The five themes were structured as priority statements: "We need to recognise" included the subthemes of being "sick enough to die" and potential rapid deteriorations in this setting; "We need to understand" with subthemes of perspectives on dying and prioritising time for conversations; "We need to connect" with subthemes of therapeutic relationship and physical presence; "We need to collaborate" with subthemes of critical care working and empowerment, and cross teams working; "We need support" with themes of experiencing support and making time to support others. Conclusion: We present an approach to identifying critical care departmental priorities for an end-of-life care improvement programme. The themes extracted will be used to evaluate systems for dying in critical care, aiming to empower staff to provide excellent care every time they look after a dying person. Relevance to Practice: This service evaluation identifies key priorities among critical care staff regarding end-of-life care. The insights can guide service improvements, such as tailored training and enhanced support for staff, to ensure better communication, collaboration, and quality care for patients at the end of life.

了解员工对改善重症监护病房临终关怀的需求:定性焦点小组分析和服务评估。
目的:重症监护是一个经常死亡的地方,高达四分之一的入院患者在入院期间死亡。照顾临终之人在实践上、专业上和个人方面都面临许多挑战。本研究的目的是为了更好地了解危重病人护理人员的观点,并确定他们需要改进的优先事项。方法:采用半结构化格式和数字转录的方法,对伦敦市中心一家大型医院信托的重症监护人员进行了三个多学科焦点小组的研究。通过归纳主题分析提取主题。结果:N = 34(护理人员18人,专职卫生人员7人,医务人员6人,文书/行政人员3人)。这五个主题被安排为优先声明:“我们需要认识到”包括“病得足以死亡”和在这种情况下可能迅速恶化的次级主题;“我们需要理解”的副主题是对死亡的看法以及优先安排对话时间;“我们需要联系”与治疗关系和身体存在的子主题;“我们需要合作”,包括重症监护工作和赋权,以及跨团队合作等次级主题;“我们需要支持”的主题是体验支持和抽出时间支持他人。结论:我们提出了一种方法来确定危重病护理部门的优先事项,以改善临终关怀计划。提取的主题将用于评估危重监护中的死亡系统,旨在使工作人员能够在每次照顾临终者时提供优质护理。与实践的相关性:这项服务评估确定了危重病护理人员在临终关怀方面的关键优先事项。这些见解可以指导服务改进,例如量身定制的培训和加强对员工的支持,以确保更好的沟通、协作和对临终患者的优质护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信