Biologic Treatments for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP): A Comparative Review of Efficiency and Risks.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2025-01-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.77804
Mihai I Tănase, Mara Tanase, Marcel Cosgarea, Gheorghe Doinel Radeanu, Septimiu Sever Pop, Alma A Maniu
{"title":"Biologic Treatments for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP): A Comparative Review of Efficiency and Risks.","authors":"Mihai I Tănase, Mara Tanase, Marcel Cosgarea, Gheorghe Doinel Radeanu, Septimiu Sever Pop, Alma A Maniu","doi":"10.7759/cureus.77804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the nasal passages and sinuses, often characterized by nasal congestion, loss of smell, facial pressure, and nasal discharge. Conventional treatments, such as corticosteroids and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), often provide only temporary relief, with frequent recurrence of symptoms. For patients with severe, refractory CRSwNP, biologic therapies have emerged as a promising treatment option. This review evaluates the efficacy and safety of biologic treatments for CRSwNP, including dupilumab, mepolizumab, and omalizumab. We analyze clinical trial data, patient-reported outcomes, and the latest research on the use of biologics in CRSwNP management. Our findings confirm the efficacy of biologics in treating CRSwNP, showing consistent improvements in both clinical and patient-reported outcomes. The use of biologics resulted in a significant reduction in nasal polyp size, improved nasal congestion, and reduced the need for further surgery or systemic corticosteroids. Moreover, patients experienced an improved sense of smell and a better quality of life. This review also includes a comparative analysis of the three biologics, highlighting their efficiency and potential risks. The findings suggest that dupilumab may be the most effective biologic therapy for CRSwNP, showing superior efficacy compared to mepolizumab and omalizumab in reducing nasal polyp size and improving nasal congestion. The article provides valuable insights for healthcare providers and patients considering biologic therapy for CRSwNP, emphasizing the importance of personalized treatment decisions based on individual patient factors, including disease severity, comorbidities, and preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 1","pages":"e77804"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.77804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the nasal passages and sinuses, often characterized by nasal congestion, loss of smell, facial pressure, and nasal discharge. Conventional treatments, such as corticosteroids and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), often provide only temporary relief, with frequent recurrence of symptoms. For patients with severe, refractory CRSwNP, biologic therapies have emerged as a promising treatment option. This review evaluates the efficacy and safety of biologic treatments for CRSwNP, including dupilumab, mepolizumab, and omalizumab. We analyze clinical trial data, patient-reported outcomes, and the latest research on the use of biologics in CRSwNP management. Our findings confirm the efficacy of biologics in treating CRSwNP, showing consistent improvements in both clinical and patient-reported outcomes. The use of biologics resulted in a significant reduction in nasal polyp size, improved nasal congestion, and reduced the need for further surgery or systemic corticosteroids. Moreover, patients experienced an improved sense of smell and a better quality of life. This review also includes a comparative analysis of the three biologics, highlighting their efficiency and potential risks. The findings suggest that dupilumab may be the most effective biologic therapy for CRSwNP, showing superior efficacy compared to mepolizumab and omalizumab in reducing nasal polyp size and improving nasal congestion. The article provides valuable insights for healthcare providers and patients considering biologic therapy for CRSwNP, emphasizing the importance of personalized treatment decisions based on individual patient factors, including disease severity, comorbidities, and preferences.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信