Ethan Harel , Ekkehard Hewer , Stefano La Rosa , Jean Philippe Brouland , Nelly Pitteloud , Federico Santoni , Maxime Brunner , Roy Thomas Daniel , Mahmoud Messerer , Giulia Cossu
{"title":"PD-L1 expression in PitNETs: Correlations with the 2022 WHO classification","authors":"Ethan Harel , Ekkehard Hewer , Stefano La Rosa , Jean Philippe Brouland , Nelly Pitteloud , Federico Santoni , Maxime Brunner , Roy Thomas Daniel , Mahmoud Messerer , Giulia Cossu","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2024.104171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div><u>and research question</u>: Prognostic factors to predict the behavior of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET) are scarce. PD-L1 expression was associated with prognosis in other neuroendocrine neoplasms and we analyzed PD-L1 expression in PitNET, according to the 2022 WHO classification.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was performed. Immunohistochemistry was used to define PD-L1 expression, which was quantified as TPS (tumor proportion score). The primary outcome was to assess the correlation between PD-L1 expression and transcription factors (TF), namely T-pit, Pit-1, SF-1 and GATA-3. As secondary outcomes, we evaluated the association between PD-L1 expression and proliferation indexes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eighty-eight patients were included. The largest group belonged to the SF-1-lineage (48%), followed by tumors of the Pit-1 lineage (32%) and T-pit lineage (17%). PD-L1 expression was associated with Pit-1 expression (p < 0.001) and with the somatotroph, lactotroph and mammosomatotroph subgroups. A TPS ⩾35% showed a 100% sensitivity for the mammosomatotroph subtype, while the optimal cut-off point was 20% for somatotroph and 15% for lactotroph tumors. PD-L1 expression was negatively associated with SF-1 and GATA3 expression(p < 0.001), with an optimal cut-point ≤5%. No association was found between PD-L1 expression and immunohistochemical proliferative factors but PD-L1 expression was associated with female sex and a younger age at diagnosis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>PD-L1 expression was associated with PIT-1 lineage, while it was downregulated in SF-1-lineage tumors. No correlation was found with proliferative factors. The role of PD-L1 expression in determining the biological behavior of PitNET remains debated and larger studies are necessary to further confirm these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 104171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751414/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424014279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
and research question: Prognostic factors to predict the behavior of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET) are scarce. PD-L1 expression was associated with prognosis in other neuroendocrine neoplasms and we analyzed PD-L1 expression in PitNET, according to the 2022 WHO classification.
Material and methods
A retrospective analysis was performed. Immunohistochemistry was used to define PD-L1 expression, which was quantified as TPS (tumor proportion score). The primary outcome was to assess the correlation between PD-L1 expression and transcription factors (TF), namely T-pit, Pit-1, SF-1 and GATA-3. As secondary outcomes, we evaluated the association between PD-L1 expression and proliferation indexes.
Results
Eighty-eight patients were included. The largest group belonged to the SF-1-lineage (48%), followed by tumors of the Pit-1 lineage (32%) and T-pit lineage (17%). PD-L1 expression was associated with Pit-1 expression (p < 0.001) and with the somatotroph, lactotroph and mammosomatotroph subgroups. A TPS ⩾35% showed a 100% sensitivity for the mammosomatotroph subtype, while the optimal cut-off point was 20% for somatotroph and 15% for lactotroph tumors. PD-L1 expression was negatively associated with SF-1 and GATA3 expression(p < 0.001), with an optimal cut-point ≤5%. No association was found between PD-L1 expression and immunohistochemical proliferative factors but PD-L1 expression was associated with female sex and a younger age at diagnosis.
Conclusion
PD-L1 expression was associated with PIT-1 lineage, while it was downregulated in SF-1-lineage tumors. No correlation was found with proliferative factors. The role of PD-L1 expression in determining the biological behavior of PitNET remains debated and larger studies are necessary to further confirm these findings.