Impact of Implant Mesiodistal Distance on Peri-Implant Bone Loss: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study

IF 3.7 2区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1111/cid.13442

Wenwen Liu, Fangyu Zhu, Lu Han, Pei Li, Hom-Lay Wang

{"title":"Impact of Implant Mesiodistal Distance on Peri-Implant Bone Loss: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study","authors":"Wenwen Liu, Fangyu Zhu, Lu Han, Pei Li, Hom-Lay Wang","doi":"10.1111/cid.13442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The purpose of this study was to verify the effect of our previously proposed mesiodistal distance for multiple posterior implants on preserving peri-implant bone, and to provide a measurable criterion for predicting implant prognosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>One hundred and two patients with dental implants placed in the posterior free-end edentulous arches were recruited in this cross-sectional study. Calibrated X-rays (peri-apical [PA] or bite-wing x-ray) were collected to measure the mesiodistal space as well as the corresponding bone resorption of implants after prosthesis placement. Implants were assigned to the test/control group according to whether their mesiodistal distance following our proposed algorithm. After adjusting covariates, logistic multivariate regression analyses were performed to examine the relationship between inter-implant distance and marginal bone loss (MBL) during each follow-up interval. The effect of smoking habits was also analyzed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Every observation period exhibited great significance between experimental and control group on peri-implant bone level (<i>p</i> = 0.006, 0.005, 0.001, 0.025, 0.001, correspondingly) and the difference had a tendency to grow as time went by except 4-year (MD = −0.19, −0.39, −0.43, −0.30, −1.26, correspondingly). While no significant difference was observed between smokers and nonsmokers in the same group (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The mesiodistal algorithm of 4–4.6 mm (implant to adjacent canine tooth), 7–7.4 mm, 8–8.5 mm, and 9–9.5 mm was proved to be effective for maintaining peri-implant bone level. It was also observed in our study that the impact of inter-implant distance outweighed that of smoking. This study provided clinicians predictable prognostic outcomes for implants and reference for deciding treatment plans.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11754714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.13442","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to verify the effect of our previously proposed mesiodistal distance for multiple posterior implants on preserving peri-implant bone, and to provide a measurable criterion for predicting implant prognosis.

Methods

One hundred and two patients with dental implants placed in the posterior free-end edentulous arches were recruited in this cross-sectional study. Calibrated X-rays (peri-apical [PA] or bite-wing x-ray) were collected to measure the mesiodistal space as well as the corresponding bone resorption of implants after prosthesis placement. Implants were assigned to the test/control group according to whether their mesiodistal distance following our proposed algorithm. After adjusting covariates, logistic multivariate regression analyses were performed to examine the relationship between inter-implant distance and marginal bone loss (MBL) during each follow-up interval. The effect of smoking habits was also analyzed.

Results

Every observation period exhibited great significance between experimental and control group on peri-implant bone level (p = 0.006, 0.005, 0.001, 0.025, 0.001, correspondingly) and the difference had a tendency to grow as time went by except 4-year (MD = −0.19, −0.39, −0.43, −0.30, −1.26, correspondingly). While no significant difference was observed between smokers and nonsmokers in the same group (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

The mesiodistal algorithm of 4–4.6 mm (implant to adjacent canine tooth), 7–7.4 mm, 8–8.5 mm, and 9–9.5 mm was proved to be effective for maintaining peri-implant bone level. It was also observed in our study that the impact of inter-implant distance outweighed that of smoking. This study provided clinicians predictable prognostic outcomes for implants and reference for deciding treatment plans.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

6.00

自引率

13.90%

发文量

103

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal. The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to: New scientific developments relating to bone Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues Computer aided implant designs Computer aided prosthetic designs Immediate implant loading Immediate implant placement Materials relating to bone induction and conduction New surgical methods relating to implant placement New materials and methods relating to implant restorations Methods for determining implant stability A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.