Proximal protection devices for carotid artery stenting - A benchtop assessment of flow reversal performance.

Jiahui Li, Esref A Bayraktar, Cem Bilgin, Yang Liu, Yigit C Senol, Jonathan Cortese, Ramanathan Kadirvel, Waleed Brinjikji, David F Kallmes
{"title":"Proximal protection devices for carotid artery stenting - A benchtop assessment of flow reversal performance.","authors":"Jiahui Li, Esref A Bayraktar, Cem Bilgin, Yang Liu, Yigit C Senol, Jonathan Cortese, Ramanathan Kadirvel, Waleed Brinjikji, David F Kallmes","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Proximal protection devices, such as TransCarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR, SilkRoad Medical, Sunnyvale), aim to yield better outcomes in carotid artery stenting (CAS) than distal protection devices by preventing plaque embolization to the brain. However, transfemoral catheters may not fully reverse flow from the external carotid artery (ECA) to the internal carotid artery (ICA). We assess a new balloon-sheath device, Femoral Flow Reversal Access for Carotid Artery Stenting (FFRACAS), for this purpose.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The FFRACAS prototype (ID = 0.117\"; L=80cm) was compared to TCAR (ID=0.104\", L=30cm) and MoMa (Medtronic, Minneapolis; ID=0.083\", L=90cm) in a pulsatile flow model with blood simulant at 800mL/min. MoMa was used according to labeled instructions, with both CCA and ECA balloon inflation, without CCA-femoral vein shunt placement, and in an off-label fashion with single balloon occlusion in the CCA and shunt. Flow rates of the ICA, ECA, and shunt, when applicable, were monitored during CAS stages: CCA flow arrest, shunt activation, and stent delivery. Experiments were conducted under two ECA inflow conditions (-10 and -20 mL/min). Statistical comparison of ICA flow rates was conducted using ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MoMa's on-label use maintained retrograde ICA flow (-0.3 mL/min) throughout CAS. Upon shunt activation, TCAR and FFRACAS reversed ICA flow similarly under low ECA inflow (ICA=-5.10 mL/min vs. -4.83 mL/min; p=0.349), but neither achieved ICA flow reversal under high ECA inflow or during stent delivery. MoMa off-label use failed to reverse ICA flow.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FFRACAS presents a potential alternative to TCAR, achieving similar degrees of flow reversal from a transfemoral approach to that achieved with the transcarotid approach. The MoMa system reliably prevents anterograde flow in ICA during CAS.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>CAS = Carotid Artery Stenting; TCAR = Transcarotid Arterial Revascularization; CCA = Common Carotid Artery; ICA = Internal Carotid Artery; ECA = External Carotid Artery; VA = Vertebral Artery; FFRACAS = Femoral Flow Reversal Access for Carotid Artery Stenting; ID = Inner Diameter; OD = Outer Diameter.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Proximal protection devices, such as TransCarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR, SilkRoad Medical, Sunnyvale), aim to yield better outcomes in carotid artery stenting (CAS) than distal protection devices by preventing plaque embolization to the brain. However, transfemoral catheters may not fully reverse flow from the external carotid artery (ECA) to the internal carotid artery (ICA). We assess a new balloon-sheath device, Femoral Flow Reversal Access for Carotid Artery Stenting (FFRACAS), for this purpose.

Materials and methods: The FFRACAS prototype (ID = 0.117"; L=80cm) was compared to TCAR (ID=0.104", L=30cm) and MoMa (Medtronic, Minneapolis; ID=0.083", L=90cm) in a pulsatile flow model with blood simulant at 800mL/min. MoMa was used according to labeled instructions, with both CCA and ECA balloon inflation, without CCA-femoral vein shunt placement, and in an off-label fashion with single balloon occlusion in the CCA and shunt. Flow rates of the ICA, ECA, and shunt, when applicable, were monitored during CAS stages: CCA flow arrest, shunt activation, and stent delivery. Experiments were conducted under two ECA inflow conditions (-10 and -20 mL/min). Statistical comparison of ICA flow rates was conducted using ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests.

Results: MoMa's on-label use maintained retrograde ICA flow (-0.3 mL/min) throughout CAS. Upon shunt activation, TCAR and FFRACAS reversed ICA flow similarly under low ECA inflow (ICA=-5.10 mL/min vs. -4.83 mL/min; p=0.349), but neither achieved ICA flow reversal under high ECA inflow or during stent delivery. MoMa off-label use failed to reverse ICA flow.

Conclusions: FFRACAS presents a potential alternative to TCAR, achieving similar degrees of flow reversal from a transfemoral approach to that achieved with the transcarotid approach. The MoMa system reliably prevents anterograde flow in ICA during CAS.

Abbreviations: CAS = Carotid Artery Stenting; TCAR = Transcarotid Arterial Revascularization; CCA = Common Carotid Artery; ICA = Internal Carotid Artery; ECA = External Carotid Artery; VA = Vertebral Artery; FFRACAS = Femoral Flow Reversal Access for Carotid Artery Stenting; ID = Inner Diameter; OD = Outer Diameter.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信