Research on atrial fibrillation diagnosis in electrocardiograms based on CLA-AF model.

IF 4.4 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
European heart journal. Digital health Pub Date : 2024-11-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjdh/ztae092
Jiajia Si, Yiliang Bao, Fengling Chen, Yue Wang, Meimei Zeng, Nongyue He, Zhu Chen, Yuan Guo
{"title":"Research on atrial fibrillation diagnosis in electrocardiograms based on CLA-AF model.","authors":"Jiajia Si, Yiliang Bao, Fengling Chen, Yue Wang, Meimei Zeng, Nongyue He, Zhu Chen, Yuan Guo","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztae092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The electrocardiogram (ECG) is the primary method for diagnosing atrial fibrillation (AF), but interpreting ECGs can be time-consuming and labour-intensive, which deserves more exploration.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We collected ECG data from 6590 patients as YY2023, classified as Normal, AF, and Other. Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM), and Attention construct the AF recognition model CNN BiLSTM Attention-Atrial Fibrillation (CLA-AF). The generalization ability of the model is validated on public datasets CPSC2018, PhysioNet2017, and PTB-XL, and we explored the performance of oversampling, resampling, and hybrid datasets. Finally, additional PhysioNet2021 was added to validate the robustness and applicability in different clinical settings. We employed the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method to interpret the model's predictions. The F1-score, Precision, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the CLA-AF model on YY2023 are 0.956, 0.970, and 1.00, respectively. Similarly, the AUC on CPSC2018, PhysioNet2017, and PTB-XL reached above 0.95, demonstrating its strong generalization ability. After oversampling PhysioNet2017, F1-score and Recall improved by 0.156 and 0.260. Generalization ability varied with sampling frequency. The model trained from the hybrid dataset has the most robust generalization ability, achieving an AUC of 0.96 or more. The AUC of PhysioNet2021 is 1.00, which proves the applicability of CLA-AF. The SHAP values visualization results demonstrate that the model's interpretation of AF aligns with the diagnostic criteria of AF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CLA-AF model demonstrates a high accuracy in recognizing AF from ECG, exhibiting remarkable applicability and robustness in diverse clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"6 1","pages":"82-95"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11750197/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztae092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The electrocardiogram (ECG) is the primary method for diagnosing atrial fibrillation (AF), but interpreting ECGs can be time-consuming and labour-intensive, which deserves more exploration.

Methods and results: We collected ECG data from 6590 patients as YY2023, classified as Normal, AF, and Other. Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM), and Attention construct the AF recognition model CNN BiLSTM Attention-Atrial Fibrillation (CLA-AF). The generalization ability of the model is validated on public datasets CPSC2018, PhysioNet2017, and PTB-XL, and we explored the performance of oversampling, resampling, and hybrid datasets. Finally, additional PhysioNet2021 was added to validate the robustness and applicability in different clinical settings. We employed the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method to interpret the model's predictions. The F1-score, Precision, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the CLA-AF model on YY2023 are 0.956, 0.970, and 1.00, respectively. Similarly, the AUC on CPSC2018, PhysioNet2017, and PTB-XL reached above 0.95, demonstrating its strong generalization ability. After oversampling PhysioNet2017, F1-score and Recall improved by 0.156 and 0.260. Generalization ability varied with sampling frequency. The model trained from the hybrid dataset has the most robust generalization ability, achieving an AUC of 0.96 or more. The AUC of PhysioNet2021 is 1.00, which proves the applicability of CLA-AF. The SHAP values visualization results demonstrate that the model's interpretation of AF aligns with the diagnostic criteria of AF.

Conclusion: The CLA-AF model demonstrates a high accuracy in recognizing AF from ECG, exhibiting remarkable applicability and robustness in diverse clinical settings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于CLA-AF模型的心电图房颤诊断研究。
目的:心电图(ECG)是诊断心房颤动(AF)的主要方法,但心电图的判读费时费力,值得进一步探索。方法和结果:我们收集了6590例YY2023患者的心电图数据,分为正常、房颤和其他。卷积神经网络(CNN)、双向长短期记忆(BiLSTM)和注意力构建了AF识别模型CNN BiLSTM注意-心房颤动(CLA-AF)。在CPSC2018、PhysioNet2017和PTB-XL公共数据集上验证了模型的泛化能力,并探讨了过采样、重采样和混合数据集的性能。最后,增加了额外的PhysioNet2021来验证不同临床环境的稳健性和适用性。我们采用SHapley加性解释(SHAP)方法来解释模型的预测。YY2023上CLA-AF模型的f1评分、Precision和ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.956、0.970和1.00。同样,CPSC2018、PhysioNet2017和PTB-XL的AUC均达到0.95以上,显示出较强的泛化能力。对PhysioNet2017过采样后,f1得分和召回率分别提高了0.156和0.260。泛化能力随采样频率的变化而变化。混合数据集训练的模型具有最强大的泛化能力,AUC达到0.96或更高。PhysioNet2021的AUC为1.00,证明了CLA-AF的适用性。SHAP值可视化结果表明,该模型对房颤的解释符合房颤的诊断标准。结论:CLA-AF模型在ECG识别房颤方面具有较高的准确性,在不同的临床环境中具有显著的适用性和稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信