Performance of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer-4o in the Adult Clinical Cardiology Self-Assessment Program.

IF 3.9 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
European heart journal. Digital health Pub Date : 2024-10-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjdh/ztae077
Abdulaziz Malik, Christopher Madias, Benjamin S Wessler
{"title":"Performance of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer-4o in the Adult Clinical Cardiology Self-Assessment Program.","authors":"Abdulaziz Malik, Christopher Madias, Benjamin S Wessler","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztae077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study evaluates the performance of OpenAI's latest large language model (LLM), Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer-4o, on the Adult Clinical Cardiology Self-Assessment Program (ACCSAP).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer-4o was tested on 639 ACCSAP questions, excluding 45 questions containing video clips, resulting in 594 questions for analysis. The questions included a mix of text-based and static image-based [electrocardiogram (ECG), angiogram, computed tomography (CT) scan, and echocardiogram] formats. The model was allowed one attempt per question. Further evaluation of image-only questions was performed on 25 questions from the database. Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer-4o correctly answered 69.2% (411/594) of the questions. The performance was higher for text-only questions (73.9%) compared with those requiring image interpretation (55.3%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The model performed worse on questions involving ECGs, with a correct rate of 56.5% compared with 73.3% for non-ECG questions (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Despite its capability to interpret medical images in the context of a text-based question, the model's accuracy varied, demonstrating strengths and notable gaps in diagnostic accuracy. It lacked accuracy in reading images (ECGs, echocardiography, and angiograms) with no context.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer-4o performed moderately well on ACCSAP questions. However, the model's performance remains inconsistent, especially in interpreting ECGs. These findings highlight the potential and current limitations of using LLMs in medical education and clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"6 1","pages":"155-158"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11750186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztae077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study evaluates the performance of OpenAI's latest large language model (LLM), Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer-4o, on the Adult Clinical Cardiology Self-Assessment Program (ACCSAP).

Methods and results: Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer-4o was tested on 639 ACCSAP questions, excluding 45 questions containing video clips, resulting in 594 questions for analysis. The questions included a mix of text-based and static image-based [electrocardiogram (ECG), angiogram, computed tomography (CT) scan, and echocardiogram] formats. The model was allowed one attempt per question. Further evaluation of image-only questions was performed on 25 questions from the database. Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer-4o correctly answered 69.2% (411/594) of the questions. The performance was higher for text-only questions (73.9%) compared with those requiring image interpretation (55.3%, P < 0.001). The model performed worse on questions involving ECGs, with a correct rate of 56.5% compared with 73.3% for non-ECG questions (P < 0.001). Despite its capability to interpret medical images in the context of a text-based question, the model's accuracy varied, demonstrating strengths and notable gaps in diagnostic accuracy. It lacked accuracy in reading images (ECGs, echocardiography, and angiograms) with no context.

Conclusion: Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer-4o performed moderately well on ACCSAP questions. However, the model's performance remains inconsistent, especially in interpreting ECGs. These findings highlight the potential and current limitations of using LLMs in medical education and clinical decision-making.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信