Kaleb Dobbs, Els Reuvekamp, Benjamin Limburg, Sujit Vijay Sakpal
{"title":"Unlocking Rural Live-Kidney Donation Through Insights From a Decade-Long Analysis at a Single Center in the Northern Great Plains.","authors":"Kaleb Dobbs, Els Reuvekamp, Benjamin Limburg, Sujit Vijay Sakpal","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.12.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on barriers to live-kidney donation in the rural United States is limited despite its widespread adoption across the country.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 1776 self-referrals for live-kidney donation between June 1, 2012, and May 31, 2022, was conducted. Multivariate analyses evaluated independent factors which may have potentially influenced donation at different stages in its process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1776 self-referrals, 398 (22.4%) individuals underwent evaluation and 121 (6.8%) of those became live-kidney donors. Middle-aged people (average age = 43 years), Whites (91.7%), and women (70.2%) were the most likely to donate. One thousand, one hundred, eighteen individuals (63.0%) dropped out after completing the intake form and the primary reasons included lost to follow-up (32.1%) and donor retraction (24.6%). Concerns related to personal health and compatibility were the predominant subjective factors for retraction. Following in-person evaluation, the most common reasons were medical comorbidities (34.9%) and inoperable renal anatomy (26.5%). Of the 1655 people that did not donate, 178 (10.8%) individuals discovered a new diagnosis during their evaluation process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Only a fraction of those who begin the process proceed to donate a kidney, and most withdraw voluntarily before reaching the in-person evaluation phase. Focused approaches aimed at concerns regarding personal health and donor-recipient compatibility in otherwise healthy, motivated candidates in the early phases of donation hold potential for improving retention rates and subsequent donations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94258,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.12.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Data on barriers to live-kidney donation in the rural United States is limited despite its widespread adoption across the country.
Methods: A retrospective review of 1776 self-referrals for live-kidney donation between June 1, 2012, and May 31, 2022, was conducted. Multivariate analyses evaluated independent factors which may have potentially influenced donation at different stages in its process.
Results: Of the 1776 self-referrals, 398 (22.4%) individuals underwent evaluation and 121 (6.8%) of those became live-kidney donors. Middle-aged people (average age = 43 years), Whites (91.7%), and women (70.2%) were the most likely to donate. One thousand, one hundred, eighteen individuals (63.0%) dropped out after completing the intake form and the primary reasons included lost to follow-up (32.1%) and donor retraction (24.6%). Concerns related to personal health and compatibility were the predominant subjective factors for retraction. Following in-person evaluation, the most common reasons were medical comorbidities (34.9%) and inoperable renal anatomy (26.5%). Of the 1655 people that did not donate, 178 (10.8%) individuals discovered a new diagnosis during their evaluation process.
Conclusions: Only a fraction of those who begin the process proceed to donate a kidney, and most withdraw voluntarily before reaching the in-person evaluation phase. Focused approaches aimed at concerns regarding personal health and donor-recipient compatibility in otherwise healthy, motivated candidates in the early phases of donation hold potential for improving retention rates and subsequent donations.