Association of the skin microbiome with the biomechanical scar properties in patients with burns

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Burns Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2025.107372
Yeongyun Jung , Cheolju Park , Huseong Lee , Jung Im Yun , So Young Joo , Cheong Hoon Seo , Seung Tae Lee , Minseok Kim , Yoon Soo Cho
{"title":"Association of the skin microbiome with the biomechanical scar properties in patients with burns","authors":"Yeongyun Jung ,&nbsp;Cheolju Park ,&nbsp;Huseong Lee ,&nbsp;Jung Im Yun ,&nbsp;So Young Joo ,&nbsp;Cheong Hoon Seo ,&nbsp;Seung Tae Lee ,&nbsp;Minseok Kim ,&nbsp;Yoon Soo Cho","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><div>Skin microbiome dysbiosis can cause skin barrier dysfunction and stimulate scar property change. Skin barrier disruption post-burn injury leads to an imbalance in skin microbe diversity and distribution. We aimed to examine the changes in the skin microbiome of re-epithelialized burn scars.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Twenty three patients were enrolled between January 2020 and July 2022. Twenty-six (13 Scar 1, immediately after complete wound healing; and 13 Scar 2, 3 months after complete wound healing) of seventy-eight scar skin samples (39 Scar 1 and 39 scar 2) qualified for analysis. Microbial community analysis was performed. Biomechanical scar properties of each patient and their correlation with skin microbiome were investigated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The α-diversity of the scarred skin microbiome increased with time (Shannon’s index, <em>p</em> = 0.029; Simpson’s index, <em>p</em> = 0.009). The linear discriminant analysis effect size results showed that <em>Bacteroides</em> abundance decreased in scars after 3 months, whereas <em>Campylobacter</em> and <em>Cutibacterium</em> abundance increased. <em>Campylobacter</em> and <em>Cutibacterium</em> negatively and positively correlated with the final distensibility gross and biological elasticity, respectively. These results were consistent with the changes in the biomechanical properties of scars.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The scar skin microbial communities in patients with burns changed with biomechanical scar properties over time, and specific skin microorganisms correlated with biomechanical scar dynamics at the genus level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"51 3","pages":"Article 107372"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417925000014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives

Skin microbiome dysbiosis can cause skin barrier dysfunction and stimulate scar property change. Skin barrier disruption post-burn injury leads to an imbalance in skin microbe diversity and distribution. We aimed to examine the changes in the skin microbiome of re-epithelialized burn scars.

Material and methods

Twenty three patients were enrolled between January 2020 and July 2022. Twenty-six (13 Scar 1, immediately after complete wound healing; and 13 Scar 2, 3 months after complete wound healing) of seventy-eight scar skin samples (39 Scar 1 and 39 scar 2) qualified for analysis. Microbial community analysis was performed. Biomechanical scar properties of each patient and their correlation with skin microbiome were investigated.

Results

The α-diversity of the scarred skin microbiome increased with time (Shannon’s index, p = 0.029; Simpson’s index, p = 0.009). The linear discriminant analysis effect size results showed that Bacteroides abundance decreased in scars after 3 months, whereas Campylobacter and Cutibacterium abundance increased. Campylobacter and Cutibacterium negatively and positively correlated with the final distensibility gross and biological elasticity, respectively. These results were consistent with the changes in the biomechanical properties of scars.

Conclusion

The scar skin microbial communities in patients with burns changed with biomechanical scar properties over time, and specific skin microorganisms correlated with biomechanical scar dynamics at the genus level.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Burns
Burns 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
18.50%
发文量
304
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Burns aims to foster the exchange of information among all engaged in preventing and treating the effects of burns. The journal focuses on clinical, scientific and social aspects of these injuries and covers the prevention of the injury, the epidemiology of such injuries and all aspects of treatment including development of new techniques and technologies and verification of existing ones. Regular features include clinical and scientific papers, state of the art reviews and descriptions of burn-care in practice. Topics covered by Burns include: the effects of smoke on man and animals, their tissues and cells; the responses to and treatment of patients and animals with chemical injuries to the skin; the biological and clinical effects of cold injuries; surgical techniques which are, or may be relevant to the treatment of burned patients during the acute or reconstructive phase following injury; well controlled laboratory studies of the effectiveness of anti-microbial agents on infection and new materials on scarring and healing; inflammatory responses to injury, effectiveness of related agents and other compounds used to modify the physiological and cellular responses to the injury; experimental studies of burns and the outcome of burn wound healing; regenerative medicine concerning the skin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信