Exploring Goal Attainment Scaling Among Occupational Therapy Students: A Retrospective Descriptive Analysis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Occupational Therapy International Pub Date : 2025-01-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/oti/6034855
Wafaa Alduraidi, E Zhang, Lauren Foster, Lisa Mische-Lawson
{"title":"Exploring Goal Attainment Scaling Among Occupational Therapy Students: A Retrospective Descriptive Analysis.","authors":"Wafaa Alduraidi, E Zhang, Lauren Foster, Lisa Mische-Lawson","doi":"10.1155/oti/6034855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> This study explored the administration of goal attainment scaling (GAS) by entry-level occupational therapy (OT) students, examining their competency following minimal training. While GAS is valuable for measuring progress toward individualized client goals, its implementation requires specific skills and training that may challenge entry-level practitioners. <b>Method:</b> Using retrospective data from a study of sensory garments' effects on children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), we analyzed GAS administration by five entry-level OT students. Students received both indirect training through their curriculum and 3 h of direct research-specific preparation. Using a modified version of the GAS checklist, we evaluated students' competency through video recordings of GAS administration sessions and written GAS. <b>Results:</b> Analysis revealed variable competency levels among students. While overall performance met 82.4% of checklist criteria, individual student competency varied considerably (54.5%-95.4%). Three of five students achieved the established 75% competency threshold. Students consistently met criteria for conceptual goal construction and timeframe specification but struggled with maintaining single dimensions of change and specifying observable behaviors. <b>Conclusions:</b> Entry-level OT students demonstrated varying levels of competency in GAS administration following minimal training. Our findings suggest the need for more comprehensive training in specific aspects of GAS, particularly in scale construction and behavioral specification. These results have important implications for how OT programs prepare students to implement GAS in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":49140,"journal":{"name":"Occupational Therapy International","volume":"2025 ","pages":"6034855"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11753844/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational Therapy International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/oti/6034855","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study explored the administration of goal attainment scaling (GAS) by entry-level occupational therapy (OT) students, examining their competency following minimal training. While GAS is valuable for measuring progress toward individualized client goals, its implementation requires specific skills and training that may challenge entry-level practitioners. Method: Using retrospective data from a study of sensory garments' effects on children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), we analyzed GAS administration by five entry-level OT students. Students received both indirect training through their curriculum and 3 h of direct research-specific preparation. Using a modified version of the GAS checklist, we evaluated students' competency through video recordings of GAS administration sessions and written GAS. Results: Analysis revealed variable competency levels among students. While overall performance met 82.4% of checklist criteria, individual student competency varied considerably (54.5%-95.4%). Three of five students achieved the established 75% competency threshold. Students consistently met criteria for conceptual goal construction and timeframe specification but struggled with maintaining single dimensions of change and specifying observable behaviors. Conclusions: Entry-level OT students demonstrated varying levels of competency in GAS administration following minimal training. Our findings suggest the need for more comprehensive training in specific aspects of GAS, particularly in scale construction and behavioral specification. These results have important implications for how OT programs prepare students to implement GAS in clinical practice.

职业治疗专业学生目标达成量表之研究:回溯性描述分析。
目的:本研究探讨职涯治疗(OT)学生目标达成量表(GAS)的管理,考察他们在最低限度训练后的能力。虽然GAS对于衡量个性化客户目标的进展是有价值的,但它的实现需要特定的技能和培训,这可能对初级从业人员构成挑战。方法:利用一项关于感官服装对自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童影响的回顾性研究数据,分析了5名入门级OT学生对GAS的使用情况。学生们既通过课程接受了间接训练,也接受了3小时的直接研究准备。使用GAS检查表的修改版本,我们通过GAS管理会议的视频记录和书面GAS来评估学生的能力。结果:分析显示学生胜任力水平存在差异。虽然总体表现符合82.4%的检查表标准,但个别学生的能力差异很大(54.5%-95.4%)。五分之三的学生达到了75%的能力门槛。学生始终满足概念目标构建和时间框架规范的标准,但难以维持单一维度的变化和指定可观察的行为。结论:入门级的OT学生在经过最少的培训后表现出不同程度的GAS管理能力。我们的研究结果表明,需要在GAS的特定方面进行更全面的培训,特别是在规模构建和行为规范方面。这些结果对于OT课程如何让学生在临床实践中实施GAS具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
121
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Occupational Therapy International is a peer-reviewed journal, publishing manuscripts that reflect the practice of occupational therapy throughout the world. Research studies or original concept papers are considered for publication. Priority for publication will be given to research studies that provide recommendations for evidence-based practice and demonstrate the effectiveness of a specific treatment method. Single subject case studies evaluating treatment effectiveness are also encouraged. Other topics that are appropriate for the journal include reliability and validity of clinical instruments, assistive technology, community rehabilitation, cultural comparisons, health promotion and wellness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信