Minimising harms of tight glycaemic control in older patients with type 2 diabetes.

IF 1.7 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Wade Thompson
{"title":"Minimising harms of tight glycaemic control in older patients with type 2 diabetes.","authors":"Wade Thompson","doi":"10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In older adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), tight glycaemic control (HbA1c 7%) can result in more harm than benefit, especially when using insulin or sulfonylureas. Older adults are at higher risk for adverse drug events, especially hypoglycaemia, which may cause falls, confusion and hospitalisations. This Therapeutic Letter evaluates the risks of tight glycaemic control in older adults with T2DM, focusing on deprescribing diabetes medications in those over 65, especially those with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. It assesses the evidence from clinical trials and guidelines, with a focus on preventing hypoglycaemia and improving patient-centred care through relaxed HbA1c targets. Large randomised controlled trials show that intensive glycaemic control (HbA1c ≤ 7%) does not reduce cardiovascular risk, but increases hypoglycaemia and mortality, particularly in older adults. Instead, glycaemic targets should be adjusted based on the patient's overall health and life expectancy. Deprescribing may be considered, starting with drugs most likely to cause hypoglycaemia (sulfonylureas or insulin). Regular reassessment and patient involvement in creating individualised treatment plans are essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":47037,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":"e1-e4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736572/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In older adults with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), tight glycaemic control (HbA1c 7%) can result in more harm than benefit, especially when using insulin or sulfonylureas. Older adults are at higher risk for adverse drug events, especially hypoglycaemia, which may cause falls, confusion and hospitalisations. This Therapeutic Letter evaluates the risks of tight glycaemic control in older adults with T2DM, focusing on deprescribing diabetes medications in those over 65, especially those with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. It assesses the evidence from clinical trials and guidelines, with a focus on preventing hypoglycaemia and improving patient-centred care through relaxed HbA1c targets. Large randomised controlled trials show that intensive glycaemic control (HbA1c ≤ 7%) does not reduce cardiovascular risk, but increases hypoglycaemia and mortality, particularly in older adults. Instead, glycaemic targets should be adjusted based on the patient's overall health and life expectancy. Deprescribing may be considered, starting with drugs most likely to cause hypoglycaemia (sulfonylureas or insulin). Regular reassessment and patient involvement in creating individualised treatment plans are essential.

降低老年2型糖尿病患者严格血糖控制的危害。
在老年2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中,严格的血糖控制(HbA1c 7%)可能弊大于利,尤其是在使用胰岛素或磺脲类药物时。老年人发生药物不良事件的风险更高,尤其是低血糖,这可能导致跌倒、神志不清和住院。本治疗信评估了老年2型糖尿病患者严格血糖控制的风险,重点关注65岁以上患者的糖尿病药物处方,特别是那些患有多种疾病和多种药物的患者。它评估了来自临床试验和指南的证据,重点是通过放宽HbA1c目标来预防低血糖和改善以患者为中心的护理。大型随机对照试验表明,强化血糖控制(HbA1c≤7%)不能降低心血管风险,但会增加低血糖和死亡率,尤其是在老年人中。相反,血糖目标应该根据患者的整体健康状况和预期寿命进行调整。可以考虑从最可能导致低血糖的药物(磺脲类药物或胰岛素)开始开处方。定期重新评估和患者参与制定个性化治疗计划是必不可少的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信