Comparing haploidentical transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and umbilical cord blood transplantation using targeted busulfan in children and adolescents with hematologic malignancies.

IF 2.8 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Kyung Taek Hong, Bo Kyung Kim, Hong Yul An, Jung Yoon Choi, Sang Hoon Song, Kyung-Sang Yu, In-Jin Jang, Hyoung Jin Kang
{"title":"Comparing haploidentical transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and umbilical cord blood transplantation using targeted busulfan in children and adolescents with hematologic malignancies.","authors":"Kyung Taek Hong, Bo Kyung Kim, Hong Yul An, Jung Yoon Choi, Sang Hoon Song, Kyung-Sang Yu, In-Jin Jang, Hyoung Jin Kang","doi":"10.1007/s44313-025-00057-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study compared the outcomes of haploidentical-related donor (HRD) and umbilical cord blood (UCB) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on patients who underwent HRD HSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (n = 41) and UCB HSCT (n = 24) after targeted busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning with intensive pharmacokinetic monitoring between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up durations in the HRD and UCB groups were 7.0 and 10.9 years, respectively. The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II-IV and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD did not differ significantly between the groups. However, the HRD group demonstrated significantly lower rates of acute GVHD grades III-IV (4.9% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.009) and non-relapse mortality (2.6% vs. 34.2%, p < 0.001) but a higher relapse incidence (32.1% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.004) than the UCB group. The 5-year event-free and overall survival rates were 65.8% and 54.2% (p = 0.204) and 78.0% and 65.7% (p = 0.142) for the HRD and UCB groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified disease status as a significant risk factor for overall survival (hazard ratio, 3.24; p = 0.016). Additionally, UCB HSCT exhibited a trend toward worse event-free survival compared to HRD HSCT (hazard ratio, 2.63; p = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings indicate that HRD HSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide provides promising outcomes compared to UCB HSCT in pediatric patients, with a trend toward improved survival over a long-term follow-up period exceeding a median of 7 years. Thus, HRD HSCT may be a valuable option for pediatric patients without human leukocyte antigen-matched donors.</p>","PeriodicalId":46224,"journal":{"name":"Blood Research","volume":"60 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757842/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44313-025-00057-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study compared the outcomes of haploidentical-related donor (HRD) and umbilical cord blood (UCB) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies.

Methods: Data on patients who underwent HRD HSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (n = 41) and UCB HSCT (n = 24) after targeted busulfan-based myeloablative conditioning with intensive pharmacokinetic monitoring between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.

Results: The median follow-up durations in the HRD and UCB groups were 7.0 and 10.9 years, respectively. The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades II-IV and moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD did not differ significantly between the groups. However, the HRD group demonstrated significantly lower rates of acute GVHD grades III-IV (4.9% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.009) and non-relapse mortality (2.6% vs. 34.2%, p < 0.001) but a higher relapse incidence (32.1% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.004) than the UCB group. The 5-year event-free and overall survival rates were 65.8% and 54.2% (p = 0.204) and 78.0% and 65.7% (p = 0.142) for the HRD and UCB groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified disease status as a significant risk factor for overall survival (hazard ratio, 3.24; p = 0.016). Additionally, UCB HSCT exhibited a trend toward worse event-free survival compared to HRD HSCT (hazard ratio, 2.63; p = 0.05).

Conclusions: These findings indicate that HRD HSCT with post-transplant cyclophosphamide provides promising outcomes compared to UCB HSCT in pediatric patients, with a trend toward improved survival over a long-term follow-up period exceeding a median of 7 years. Thus, HRD HSCT may be a valuable option for pediatric patients without human leukocyte antigen-matched donors.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

单倍体移植与移植后环磷酰胺和靶向布苏凡脐带血移植在儿童和青少年血液恶性肿瘤中的比较
目的:本研究比较了单倍体相关供体(HRD)和脐带血(UCB)造血干细胞移植(HSCT)治疗儿童血液病恶性患者的结果。方法:回顾性分析2009年至2018年接受移植后环磷酰胺(n = 41)和UCB HSCT (n = 24)的HRD HSCT患者的数据,这些患者在接受靶向布磺胺为基础的清髓调节后进行了强化药代动力学监测。结果:HRD组和UCB组的中位随访时间分别为7.0年和10.9年。急性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD) II-IV级和中度至重度慢性GVHD的累积发病率在两组之间无显著差异。然而,HRD组显示出明显较低的急性GVHD III-IV级发生率(4.9% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.009)和非复发死亡率(2.6% vs. 34.2%, p)。结论:这些发现表明,与UCB HSCT相比,HRD移植后环磷酰胺HSCT在儿科患者中提供了有希望的结果,在超过中位7年的长期随访期间有改善生存率的趋势。因此,对于没有人类白细胞抗原匹配供体的儿科患者,HRD HSCT可能是一个有价值的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Research
Blood Research HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信