Interaction between opium use and cigarette smoking on bladder cancer: An inverse probability weighting approach based on a multicenter case-control study in Iran
Rahim Akrami , Maryam Hadji , Hamideh Rashidian , Maryam Nazemipour , Ahmad Naghibzadeh-Tahami , Alireza Ansari-Moghaddam , Kazem Zendehdel , Mohammad Ali Mansournia
{"title":"Interaction between opium use and cigarette smoking on bladder cancer: An inverse probability weighting approach based on a multicenter case-control study in Iran","authors":"Rahim Akrami , Maryam Hadji , Hamideh Rashidian , Maryam Nazemipour , Ahmad Naghibzadeh-Tahami , Alireza Ansari-Moghaddam , Kazem Zendehdel , Mohammad Ali Mansournia","doi":"10.1016/j.gloepi.2024.100182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Opium and cigarette smoking have been identified as significant cancer risk factors. Recently, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified opium as a Group 1 carcinogen in 2020.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>Using data from a multicenter case-control study in Iran called IROPICAN, involving 717 cases of bladder cancer and 3477 controls, we assessed the interactions on the causal additive scale between opium use and cigarette smoking and their attributing effects to evaluate public health relevance and test for different mechanistic interaction forms to provide new insights for developing of bladder cancer. A minimally sufficient set of confounders was identified using a causal directed acyclic graph, and the data were analysed employing multiple logistic regression and the inverse probability-of-treatment weighting estimator of the marginal structural linear odds model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our findings indicated a significant increase in the risk of bladder cancer associated with concurrent opium use and cigarette smoking (adjusted OR = 6.34, 95 % CI 5.02–7.99; <em>p</em> < 0.001), demonstrating a super-additive interaction between these exposures (Weighted RERI<sub>OR</sub> = 2.02, 95 % CI 0.47–3.58; <em>p</em> = 0.005). The presence of a super-additive interaction suggests that interventions targeting opium users who smoke cigarettes would yield greater benefits compared to non-opium users. Furthermore, there was a mechanistic interaction between two exposures (<em>P</em>-value = 0.005) if we assumed two of the exposures have positive monotonic effects, i.e., there must be a sufficient-component cause for developing bladder cancer, which has both opium use and cigarette smoking as components.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is a causal additive interaction between opium use and cigarette smoking. We observed a super-additive interaction, suggesting the need to focus interventions on specific subgroups. Furthermore, the presence of mechanistic interactions offers profound insights into the mechanisms of cancer induction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36311,"journal":{"name":"Global Epidemiology","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751544/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590113324000488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Opium and cigarette smoking have been identified as significant cancer risk factors. Recently, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified opium as a Group 1 carcinogen in 2020.
Method
Using data from a multicenter case-control study in Iran called IROPICAN, involving 717 cases of bladder cancer and 3477 controls, we assessed the interactions on the causal additive scale between opium use and cigarette smoking and their attributing effects to evaluate public health relevance and test for different mechanistic interaction forms to provide new insights for developing of bladder cancer. A minimally sufficient set of confounders was identified using a causal directed acyclic graph, and the data were analysed employing multiple logistic regression and the inverse probability-of-treatment weighting estimator of the marginal structural linear odds model.
Results
Our findings indicated a significant increase in the risk of bladder cancer associated with concurrent opium use and cigarette smoking (adjusted OR = 6.34, 95 % CI 5.02–7.99; p < 0.001), demonstrating a super-additive interaction between these exposures (Weighted RERIOR = 2.02, 95 % CI 0.47–3.58; p = 0.005). The presence of a super-additive interaction suggests that interventions targeting opium users who smoke cigarettes would yield greater benefits compared to non-opium users. Furthermore, there was a mechanistic interaction between two exposures (P-value = 0.005) if we assumed two of the exposures have positive monotonic effects, i.e., there must be a sufficient-component cause for developing bladder cancer, which has both opium use and cigarette smoking as components.
Conclusion
There is a causal additive interaction between opium use and cigarette smoking. We observed a super-additive interaction, suggesting the need to focus interventions on specific subgroups. Furthermore, the presence of mechanistic interactions offers profound insights into the mechanisms of cancer induction.
鸦片和吸烟已被确定为重要的癌症危险因素。近日,国际癌症研究机构(IARC)在2020年将鸦片列为1类致癌物。方法:利用伊朗一项名为IROPICAN的多中心病例对照研究的数据,包括717例膀胱癌和3477例对照,我们评估了鸦片使用和吸烟之间的因果加性相互作用及其归因效应,以评估公共卫生相关性,并测试了不同的机制相互作用形式,为膀胱癌的发展提供新的见解。使用因果有向无环图确定了一组最小充分的混杂因素,并使用多元逻辑回归和边际结构线性几率模型的逆处理概率加权估计器对数据进行了分析。结果:我们的研究结果表明,同时使用鸦片和吸烟与膀胱癌的风险显著增加(调整后OR = 6.34, 95% CI 5.02-7.99;p OR = 2.02, 95% CI 0.47-3.58;p = 0.005)。超加性相互作用的存在表明,与非鸦片使用者相比,针对吸烟的鸦片使用者的干预措施将产生更大的益处。此外,如果我们假设两种暴露具有正单调效应,则两种暴露之间存在机制相互作用(p值= 0.005),即必须存在发生膀胱癌的充分成分原因,其中鸦片使用和吸烟都是成分。结论:吸食鸦片与吸烟之间存在因果加性相互作用。我们观察到一种超加性相互作用,表明需要将干预重点放在特定的亚群上。此外,机制相互作用的存在为癌症诱导机制提供了深刻的见解。