Andrew L Guymon, Madigan M Moore, Laura E Nelson, Mir Ali
{"title":"Do We Need a Fluid Bolus? The Necessary Refinement of Pediatric Propofol Sedation - a Quality Improvement Project.","authors":"Andrew L Guymon, Madigan M Moore, Laura E Nelson, Mir Ali","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Propofol is commonly used for pediatric MRIs to minimize patient movement. At our institution, intensivists typically administer a prophylactic 20 ml/kg saline bolus to maintain blood pressure (BP) during propofol sedation. This quality improvement project assessed whether a 10 ml/kg and a completely eliminated saline bolus are as effective as the standard 20 ml/kg bolus in completing pediatric propofol sedation and maintaining Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed pediatric propofol sedations over an 18 month period in which pediatric intensivists administered the standard 20 ml/kg saline bolus, a reduced 10 ml/kg bolus, and no saline bolus. Successful sedation meant completing the MRI without complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>172 patients aged 19 months to 16 years were assessed. The percentage of successful sedations with a 20 ml/kg bolus, 10 ml/kg bolus, and no saline bolus was 92%, 100%, and 91%, respectively. There was a statistically significant higher average MAP in the 0 ml/kg group than in the 10 and 20 ml/kg cohorts (p = 0.002). No patients required an additional bolus to maintain blood pressure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The preservation of hemodynamic stability without a saline bolus supports the literature that the saline bolus can be safely reduced during pediatric propofol sedation for MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":39219,"journal":{"name":"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association","volume":"77 12","pages":"557-560"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Propofol is commonly used for pediatric MRIs to minimize patient movement. At our institution, intensivists typically administer a prophylactic 20 ml/kg saline bolus to maintain blood pressure (BP) during propofol sedation. This quality improvement project assessed whether a 10 ml/kg and a completely eliminated saline bolus are as effective as the standard 20 ml/kg bolus in completing pediatric propofol sedation and maintaining Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP).
Methods: We reviewed pediatric propofol sedations over an 18 month period in which pediatric intensivists administered the standard 20 ml/kg saline bolus, a reduced 10 ml/kg bolus, and no saline bolus. Successful sedation meant completing the MRI without complications.
Results: 172 patients aged 19 months to 16 years were assessed. The percentage of successful sedations with a 20 ml/kg bolus, 10 ml/kg bolus, and no saline bolus was 92%, 100%, and 91%, respectively. There was a statistically significant higher average MAP in the 0 ml/kg group than in the 10 and 20 ml/kg cohorts (p = 0.002). No patients required an additional bolus to maintain blood pressure.
Conclusions: The preservation of hemodynamic stability without a saline bolus supports the literature that the saline bolus can be safely reduced during pediatric propofol sedation for MRI.