Do We Need a Fluid Bolus? The Necessary Refinement of Pediatric Propofol Sedation - a Quality Improvement Project.

Q4 Medicine
Andrew L Guymon, Madigan M Moore, Laura E Nelson, Mir Ali
{"title":"Do We Need a Fluid Bolus? The Necessary Refinement of Pediatric Propofol Sedation - a Quality Improvement Project.","authors":"Andrew L Guymon, Madigan M Moore, Laura E Nelson, Mir Ali","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Propofol is commonly used for pediatric MRIs to minimize patient movement. At our institution, intensivists typically administer a prophylactic 20 ml/kg saline bolus to maintain blood pressure (BP) during propofol sedation. This quality improvement project assessed whether a 10 ml/kg and a completely eliminated saline bolus are as effective as the standard 20 ml/kg bolus in completing pediatric propofol sedation and maintaining Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed pediatric propofol sedations over an 18 month period in which pediatric intensivists administered the standard 20 ml/kg saline bolus, a reduced 10 ml/kg bolus, and no saline bolus. Successful sedation meant completing the MRI without complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>172 patients aged 19 months to 16 years were assessed. The percentage of successful sedations with a 20 ml/kg bolus, 10 ml/kg bolus, and no saline bolus was 92%, 100%, and 91%, respectively. There was a statistically significant higher average MAP in the 0 ml/kg group than in the 10 and 20 ml/kg cohorts (p = 0.002). No patients required an additional bolus to maintain blood pressure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The preservation of hemodynamic stability without a saline bolus supports the literature that the saline bolus can be safely reduced during pediatric propofol sedation for MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":39219,"journal":{"name":"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association","volume":"77 12","pages":"557-560"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Propofol is commonly used for pediatric MRIs to minimize patient movement. At our institution, intensivists typically administer a prophylactic 20 ml/kg saline bolus to maintain blood pressure (BP) during propofol sedation. This quality improvement project assessed whether a 10 ml/kg and a completely eliminated saline bolus are as effective as the standard 20 ml/kg bolus in completing pediatric propofol sedation and maintaining Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP).

Methods: We reviewed pediatric propofol sedations over an 18 month period in which pediatric intensivists administered the standard 20 ml/kg saline bolus, a reduced 10 ml/kg bolus, and no saline bolus. Successful sedation meant completing the MRI without complications.

Results: 172 patients aged 19 months to 16 years were assessed. The percentage of successful sedations with a 20 ml/kg bolus, 10 ml/kg bolus, and no saline bolus was 92%, 100%, and 91%, respectively. There was a statistically significant higher average MAP in the 0 ml/kg group than in the 10 and 20 ml/kg cohorts (p = 0.002). No patients required an additional bolus to maintain blood pressure.

Conclusions: The preservation of hemodynamic stability without a saline bolus supports the literature that the saline bolus can be safely reduced during pediatric propofol sedation for MRI.

我们需要补液吗?小儿异丙酚镇静的必要改进——质量改进项目。
背景:异丙酚通常用于儿童核磁共振成像,以减少患者的运动。在我们的机构,强化医师通常在异丙酚镇静期间给予预防性20ml /kg生理盐水丸来维持血压(BP)。本质量改进项目评估了10ml /kg和完全消除的生理盐水丸剂在完成儿科异丙酚镇静和维持平均动脉压(MAP)方面是否与标准20ml /kg丸剂一样有效。方法:我们回顾了18个月的儿童异丙酚镇静,其中儿科强化医生给予标准20ml /kg生理盐水丸,减少10ml /kg丸和无生理盐水丸。成功镇静意味着完成MRI检查无并发症。结果:172例患者,年龄19个月至16岁。20 ml/kg、10 ml/kg和无生理盐水组镇静成功率分别为92%、100%和91%。0 ml/kg组的平均MAP高于10和20 ml/kg组(p = 0.002)。没有患者需要额外的药丸来维持血压。结论:在不使用生理盐水丸的情况下保持血流动力学稳定性,支持了文献中关于在小儿MRI异丙酚镇静期间可以安全减少生理盐水丸的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信