Use of Lung Volume Recruitment Technique in Patients With Chronic Respiratory Disease Among Brazilian Health Professionals.

IF 2 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/pm/4073171
Robert de Melo, Livia Alcantara, Max Sarmet, Nicole L Sheers, David J Berlowitz, Vinicius Maldaner
{"title":"Use of Lung Volume Recruitment Technique in Patients With Chronic Respiratory Disease Among Brazilian Health Professionals.","authors":"Robert de Melo, Livia Alcantara, Max Sarmet, Nicole L Sheers, David J Berlowitz, Vinicius Maldaner","doi":"10.1155/pm/4073171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Lung volume recruitment (LVR) is a stacked-breath assisted inflation technique in which consecutive insufflations are delivered, without exhaling in between, until the maximum tolerable inflation capacity is reached. Although LVR is recommended in some neuromuscular disease guidelines, there is little information detailing when and how allied health professionals (AHPs) prescribe LVR. <b>Objective:</b> This study is aimed at describing the use of LVR in practice across Brazil. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional e-survey (Sep-Nov 2023) explored LVR practices among qualified clinical or home care AHPs in Brazil. It gathered participant data on geographical region, profession, and experience. It delved into LVR specifics: clinical population and indications for use, prescription (frequency, dosage, and interfaces), related side effects, outcomes assessed, and combined therapies. Results were presented descriptively. <b>Results:</b> One hundred two surveys (74 physical therapists (PTs) and 28 speech and language pathologists (SLPs)) from diverse locations were collected. LVR was predominantly prescribed for adults (57%), with the most common diagnosis being amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (84%). Changes in peak cough flow and vital capacity were the most common reasons for LVR prescription. Maximal insufflation capacity was reportedly measured by 58% of PTs and 22% of SLPs. Chest wall soreness and discomfort were the most common side effects, and many respondents did not provide warnings about potential side effects (42% PTs and 50% SLPs). The study highlighted common use of other respiratory therapy devices alongside LVR. <b>Conclusion:</b> LVR is available in routine clinical and home care settings in Brazil. There is a lack of standardization regarding indications, prescription, and outcome measures among PTs and SLPs in Brazil. Clear recommendations and guidelines are needed to standardize these parameters, enabling more objective data and facilitating comparisons between centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":46434,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"2025 ","pages":"4073171"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/pm/4073171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lung volume recruitment (LVR) is a stacked-breath assisted inflation technique in which consecutive insufflations are delivered, without exhaling in between, until the maximum tolerable inflation capacity is reached. Although LVR is recommended in some neuromuscular disease guidelines, there is little information detailing when and how allied health professionals (AHPs) prescribe LVR. Objective: This study is aimed at describing the use of LVR in practice across Brazil. Methods: A cross-sectional e-survey (Sep-Nov 2023) explored LVR practices among qualified clinical or home care AHPs in Brazil. It gathered participant data on geographical region, profession, and experience. It delved into LVR specifics: clinical population and indications for use, prescription (frequency, dosage, and interfaces), related side effects, outcomes assessed, and combined therapies. Results were presented descriptively. Results: One hundred two surveys (74 physical therapists (PTs) and 28 speech and language pathologists (SLPs)) from diverse locations were collected. LVR was predominantly prescribed for adults (57%), with the most common diagnosis being amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (84%). Changes in peak cough flow and vital capacity were the most common reasons for LVR prescription. Maximal insufflation capacity was reportedly measured by 58% of PTs and 22% of SLPs. Chest wall soreness and discomfort were the most common side effects, and many respondents did not provide warnings about potential side effects (42% PTs and 50% SLPs). The study highlighted common use of other respiratory therapy devices alongside LVR. Conclusion: LVR is available in routine clinical and home care settings in Brazil. There is a lack of standardization regarding indications, prescription, and outcome measures among PTs and SLPs in Brazil. Clear recommendations and guidelines are needed to standardize these parameters, enabling more objective data and facilitating comparisons between centers.

巴西卫生专业人员在慢性呼吸系统疾病患者中肺容量增加技术的应用
背景:肺容量补充(LVR)是一种叠加呼吸辅助充气技术,其中连续充气,中间不呼气,直到达到最大可容忍的充气能力。虽然LVR在一些神经肌肉疾病指南中被推荐,但很少有信息详细说明何时以及如何联合卫生专业人员(ahp)开LVR。目的:本研究旨在描述LVR在巴西各地的实践使用。方法:一项横断面电子调查(2023年9月至11月)探讨了巴西合格临床或家庭护理ahp的LVR实践。它收集了参与者的地理区域、职业和经验数据。它深入研究了LVR的具体情况:临床人群和使用适应症、处方(频率、剂量和界面)、相关副作用、评估的结果和联合治疗。结果是描述性的。结果:收集了来自不同地区的物理治疗师(74名)和语言病理学家(28名)共102份问卷。LVR主要用于成人(57%),最常见的诊断是肌萎缩侧索硬化症(84%)。咳嗽高峰流量和肺活量的变化是LVR处方最常见的原因。据报道,58%的PTs和22%的slp测量了最大充气能力。胸壁疼痛和不适是最常见的副作用,许多受访者没有提供潜在副作用的警告(42%的PTs和50%的slp)。该研究强调了除LVR外其他呼吸治疗设备的普遍使用。结论:LVR在巴西的常规临床和家庭护理环境中是可行的。在巴西,PTs和slp之间缺乏关于适应症、处方和结果测量的标准化。需要明确的建议和指导方针来规范这些参数,使数据更加客观,并促进中心之间的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pulmonary Medicine
Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信