Impact of disinfection methods used in the slaughterhouse environment on microbiome diversity throughout the meat production chain

IF 4.8 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Wissal Naim , Julia Manetsberger , Leyre Lavilla Lerma , Nabil Benomar , Natacha Caballero Gómez , Inmaculada S. Cuesta-Bertomeu , Jaime Ángel Gata Díaz , Hikmate Abriouel
{"title":"Impact of disinfection methods used in the slaughterhouse environment on microbiome diversity throughout the meat production chain","authors":"Wissal Naim ,&nbsp;Julia Manetsberger ,&nbsp;Leyre Lavilla Lerma ,&nbsp;Nabil Benomar ,&nbsp;Natacha Caballero Gómez ,&nbsp;Inmaculada S. Cuesta-Bertomeu ,&nbsp;Jaime Ángel Gata Díaz ,&nbsp;Hikmate Abriouel","doi":"10.1016/j.crmicr.2024.100336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Slaughterhouse environments are prone to microbial contamination, influenced by factors like set-up, size and area as well as disinfection practices. Thus, effective control measures are crucial to prevent the spread of pathogens and their contaminant genes (antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence factors) throughout the food chain. In the present study, we assessed the microbial contamination in environmental surfaces of three slaughterhouses located in the Jaén province (Spain). We also evaluated the impact of different disinfection strategies on microbial loads and diversity by means of culture dependent and independent methods. The results revealed a statistically significant inter- and intra-specific differences in microbial loads including the most important pathogens such as pseudomonads, staphylococci, <em>Escherichia coli, Salmonella</em> sp. and <em>Campylobacter jejuni</em>. Disinfection strategies using routine disinfectant (used by the slaughterhouse), HLE disinfectant, UV, or combinations thereof showed varying effectiveness. The newly developed sustainable HLE disinfectant was most effective, while UV had the lowest disinfection strength, and routine disinfectants failed to eradicate all pathogens.</div><div>Metagenomic analysis identified Pseudomonadota as the dominant phylum, followed by Actinomycetota and Bacteroidota. Results furthermore indicated shifts from sacrifice to cold rooms, with an increase in Gammaproteobacteria, particularly <em>Moraxellaceae</em> (represented by <em>Psychrobacter cryohalolentis</em>) over <em>Acinetobacter</em> sp. In conclusion, this study highlights the potential of HLE disinfectant (alone or in combination with the routine disinfectant) as a more effective disinfection measure on environmental surfaces, particularly for combating multi-drug resistant pathogens compared to other disinfection methods currently used.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34305,"journal":{"name":"Current Research in Microbial Sciences","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100336"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751542/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Research in Microbial Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666517424001196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Slaughterhouse environments are prone to microbial contamination, influenced by factors like set-up, size and area as well as disinfection practices. Thus, effective control measures are crucial to prevent the spread of pathogens and their contaminant genes (antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence factors) throughout the food chain. In the present study, we assessed the microbial contamination in environmental surfaces of three slaughterhouses located in the Jaén province (Spain). We also evaluated the impact of different disinfection strategies on microbial loads and diversity by means of culture dependent and independent methods. The results revealed a statistically significant inter- and intra-specific differences in microbial loads including the most important pathogens such as pseudomonads, staphylococci, Escherichia coli, Salmonella sp. and Campylobacter jejuni. Disinfection strategies using routine disinfectant (used by the slaughterhouse), HLE disinfectant, UV, or combinations thereof showed varying effectiveness. The newly developed sustainable HLE disinfectant was most effective, while UV had the lowest disinfection strength, and routine disinfectants failed to eradicate all pathogens.
Metagenomic analysis identified Pseudomonadota as the dominant phylum, followed by Actinomycetota and Bacteroidota. Results furthermore indicated shifts from sacrifice to cold rooms, with an increase in Gammaproteobacteria, particularly Moraxellaceae (represented by Psychrobacter cryohalolentis) over Acinetobacter sp. In conclusion, this study highlights the potential of HLE disinfectant (alone or in combination with the routine disinfectant) as a more effective disinfection measure on environmental surfaces, particularly for combating multi-drug resistant pathogens compared to other disinfection methods currently used.

Abstract Image

屠宰场环境中使用的消毒方法对整个肉类生产链中微生物群多样性的影响。
受设置、大小和面积以及消毒措施等因素的影响,屠宰场环境容易受到微生物污染。因此,有效的控制措施对于防止病原体及其污染物基因(抗菌素耐药基因和毒力因子)在整个食物链中传播至关重要。在本研究中,我们评估了位于西班牙贾文森省的三个屠宰场环境表面的微生物污染。我们还通过培养依赖和独立方法评估了不同消毒策略对微生物负荷和多样性的影响。结果显示,包括假单胞菌、葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌、沙门氏菌和空肠弯曲杆菌等最重要的病原体在内的微生物负荷在种间和种内存在统计学上的显著差异。使用常规消毒剂(屠宰场使用)、HLE消毒剂、紫外线或其组合的消毒策略显示出不同的效果。新开发的可持续HLE消毒剂效果最好,紫外线消毒强度最低,常规消毒剂不能根除所有病原体。宏基因组分析显示假单胞菌门为优势门,放线菌门和拟杆菌门次之。结果进一步表明,从牺牲到冷室的转变,随着Gammaproteobacteria的增加,特别是Moraxellaceae(以低温嗜盐杆菌为代表)比不动杆菌sp.增加。总之,本研究强调了HLE消毒剂(单独使用或与常规消毒剂联合使用)作为环境表面更有效消毒措施的潜力。与目前使用的其他消毒方法相比,特别是在对抗多重耐药病原体方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Research in Microbial Sciences
Current Research in Microbial Sciences Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology and Microbiology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信