A Survey of Employed Orthopedic Surgeons Ability to Estimate Operating Room Device Costs.

Q4 Medicine
Michaela Derby, Edward Floyd, David Sturdevant, Hunter O'Connor, Nathan Skelley
{"title":"A Survey of Employed Orthopedic Surgeons Ability to Estimate Operating Room Device Costs.","authors":"Michaela Derby, Edward Floyd, David Sturdevant, Hunter O'Connor, Nathan Skelley","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orthopaedic devices represent a large amount of the overall cost incurred in the operating room. It is unknown if employed sports medicine surgeons are aware of the true prices of these devices. The purpose of this study was to assess sports medicine orthopaedic surgeons' knowledge of implant and device costs, as well of commonly used items in their operating rooms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>REDCap surveys were distributed to 18 orthopaedic surgeons who perform arthroscopic and sports medicine procedures. All surgeons are employed at a healthcare system spanning four different states. Surgeons estimated the cost of 26 items used in the operating room. A surgeon reported cost within 10% of the actual price was established as having awareness of that item's cost.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>Response rate was 89% (16/18). Twenty-five percent (n = 4) of surgeons were within 10% of the actual cost of only one item (Swivelock 4.75mm). Forty-three percent (n = 7) were within 20% of the actual cost of one item (Achilles Allograft). Those who perceived they had the poorest insight into device costs were found to have the greatest difference between estimated and actual cost. Surgeons in our study were not aware of the cost of commonly used items and implants in the operating room. Surgeons with greater insight into this topic can contribute toward a more value-based delivery of care. These findings support engaging employed physicians with initiatives to increase their awareness of the actual cost of the care they deliver, benefiting the whole healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":39219,"journal":{"name":"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association","volume":"77 12","pages":"534-539"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Orthopaedic devices represent a large amount of the overall cost incurred in the operating room. It is unknown if employed sports medicine surgeons are aware of the true prices of these devices. The purpose of this study was to assess sports medicine orthopaedic surgeons' knowledge of implant and device costs, as well of commonly used items in their operating rooms.

Methods: REDCap surveys were distributed to 18 orthopaedic surgeons who perform arthroscopic and sports medicine procedures. All surgeons are employed at a healthcare system spanning four different states. Surgeons estimated the cost of 26 items used in the operating room. A surgeon reported cost within 10% of the actual price was established as having awareness of that item's cost.

Results and conclusions: Response rate was 89% (16/18). Twenty-five percent (n = 4) of surgeons were within 10% of the actual cost of only one item (Swivelock 4.75mm). Forty-three percent (n = 7) were within 20% of the actual cost of one item (Achilles Allograft). Those who perceived they had the poorest insight into device costs were found to have the greatest difference between estimated and actual cost. Surgeons in our study were not aware of the cost of commonly used items and implants in the operating room. Surgeons with greater insight into this topic can contribute toward a more value-based delivery of care. These findings support engaging employed physicians with initiatives to increase their awareness of the actual cost of the care they deliver, benefiting the whole healthcare system.

在职骨科医生估计手术室设备费用能力的调查。
背景:骨科器械占手术室总费用的很大一部分。目前尚不清楚受雇的运动医学外科医生是否了解这些设备的真实价格。本研究的目的是评估运动医学骨科医生对植入物和器械成本的知识,以及他们手术室常用物品的知识。方法:REDCap调查分布到18位进行关节镜和运动医学手术的骨科医生。所有外科医生都在横跨四个不同州的医疗保健系统工作。外科医生估计了手术室中使用的26种物品的成本。外科医生报告的成本在实际价格的10%以内,被认定为知道该项目的成本。结果与结论:有效率为89%(16/18)。25% (n = 4)的外科医生只有一个项目(Swivelock 4.75mm)的实际成本在10%以内。43% (n = 7)的移植成本低于同一项目(跟腱同种异体移植)实际成本的20%。那些认为自己对设备成本了解最少的人在估计成本和实际成本之间的差异最大。在我们的研究中,外科医生没有意识到手术室中常用物品和植入物的成本。对这一主题有更深入了解的外科医生可以为更有价值的医疗服务做出贡献。这些发现支持让受雇的医生主动提高他们对所提供护理的实际成本的认识,从而使整个医疗保健系统受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信