Anatomical and functional changes after internal limiting membrane peeling

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Elham Sadeghi , Maria F. Colorado-Zavala , Hussein Almuhtaseb , Ramesh Venkatesh , Barbara Parolini , Jay Chhablani
{"title":"Anatomical and functional changes after internal limiting membrane peeling","authors":"Elham Sadeghi ,&nbsp;Maria F. Colorado-Zavala ,&nbsp;Hussein Almuhtaseb ,&nbsp;Ramesh Venkatesh ,&nbsp;Barbara Parolini ,&nbsp;Jay Chhablani","doi":"10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling has been an acceptable step in vitrectomy surgeries for various retinal diseases such as macular hole, chronic macular edema following epiretinal membrane (ERM), and vitreoretinal traction. Despite all the benefits, this procedure has some side effects, which may lead to structural damage and functional vision loss. Light and dye toxicity may induce reversible and irreversible retina damage, which will be observed in postoperative optical coherence tomography scans. Retinal nerve fiber layer damage is attributed to ganglion cell degeneration and axonal transport alteration and dissociated optic nerve fiber layer is due to Müller cell damage. Eccentric MHs and recurrence of previous MHs may also lead to vision loss. Iatrogenic retinal damage may cause structural retinal changes without significant vision loss or progression to choroidal neovascularization. The mechanism of persistent macular edema after membrane peeling is still unclear, but it has been related to tractional trauma and blood-retina barrier damage. The reappearance of ERM is another cause of decreased vision after ILM peeling, which might be secondary to incomplete membrane removal. In glaucoma patients, ILM peeling is associated with significantly worsening the mean deviation on the visual field test after the surgery. We discussed various causes of vision loss and structural changes following ILM peeling. These causes may be attributed to the surgical procedure itself or the associated steps, instruments, and dyes used during the ILM peeling procedure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22102,"journal":{"name":"Survey of ophthalmology","volume":"70 3","pages":"Pages 357-368"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039625725000189","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling has been an acceptable step in vitrectomy surgeries for various retinal diseases such as macular hole, chronic macular edema following epiretinal membrane (ERM), and vitreoretinal traction. Despite all the benefits, this procedure has some side effects, which may lead to structural damage and functional vision loss. Light and dye toxicity may induce reversible and irreversible retina damage, which will be observed in postoperative optical coherence tomography scans. Retinal nerve fiber layer damage is attributed to ganglion cell degeneration and axonal transport alteration and dissociated optic nerve fiber layer is due to Müller cell damage. Eccentric MHs and recurrence of previous MHs may also lead to vision loss. Iatrogenic retinal damage may cause structural retinal changes without significant vision loss or progression to choroidal neovascularization. The mechanism of persistent macular edema after membrane peeling is still unclear, but it has been related to tractional trauma and blood-retina barrier damage. The reappearance of ERM is another cause of decreased vision after ILM peeling, which might be secondary to incomplete membrane removal. In glaucoma patients, ILM peeling is associated with significantly worsening the mean deviation on the visual field test after the surgery. We discussed various causes of vision loss and structural changes following ILM peeling. These causes may be attributed to the surgical procedure itself or the associated steps, instruments, and dyes used during the ILM peeling procedure.
内限制膜剥离后的解剖和功能变化。
内限制膜(ILM)剥离已成为各种视网膜疾病(如黄斑孔、视网膜前膜(ERM)后慢性黄斑水肿和玻璃体视网膜牵引)的玻璃体切除手术中可接受的步骤。尽管有这些好处,但这种手术也有一些副作用,可能导致结构损伤和功能性视力丧失。光和染料毒性可引起可逆和不可逆的视网膜损伤,这将在术后光学相干断层扫描中观察到。视网膜神经纤维层损伤是由神经节细胞变性和轴突转运改变引起的,视神经纤维层游离是由勒细胞损伤引起的。偏心性髋臼畸形和以前髋臼畸形的复发也可能导致视力丧失。医源性视网膜损伤可引起视网膜结构性改变,但没有明显的视力丧失或进展到脉络膜新生血管。膜剥离后黄斑持续水肿的机制尚不清楚,但与牵引性创伤和血视网膜屏障损伤有关。ERM的再次出现是ILM剥落后视力下降的另一个原因,这可能是继发于膜去除不完全。在青光眼患者中,ILM剥落与术后视野测试的平均偏差显著恶化相关。我们讨论了ILM剥落后视力丧失和结构变化的各种原因。这些原因可能是由于手术过程本身或相关的步骤,仪器和染料在ILM剥离过程中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Survey of ophthalmology
Survey of ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
138
审稿时长
14.8 weeks
期刊介绍: Survey of Ophthalmology is a clinically oriented review journal designed to keep ophthalmologists up to date. Comprehensive major review articles, written by experts and stringently refereed, integrate the literature on subjects selected for their clinical importance. Survey also includes feature articles, section reviews, book reviews, and abstracts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信