Who's Afraid of Murderous Rage? When Euthanasia Colludes with Self-Destructiveness.

Q4 Psychology
Psychodynamic Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1521/pdps.2025.53.1.002
Ardalan Najjarkakhaki, Jon Frederickson, Gerrie Bloothoofd
{"title":"Who's Afraid of Murderous Rage? When Euthanasia Colludes with Self-Destructiveness.","authors":"Ardalan Najjarkakhaki, Jon Frederickson, Gerrie Bloothoofd","doi":"10.1521/pdps.2025.53.1.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The impact of intense countertransference affects in working with patients experiencing complex trauma can have a critical effect on decisions about euthanasia, especially when such decisions are made solely on the grounds of a psychiatric condition. These countertransference dynamics become particularly significant in the context of the rising number of euthanasia requests by psychiatric patients in the Netherlands. We contend that for a subgroup of patients with complex trauma, attachment trauma, and personality disorders, the label \"treatment-resistant\" may be applied prematurely and incorrectly. This may occur when highly complex transference-countertransference dynamics are not properly assessed, and tertiary treatment options like intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy (ISTDP) are not considered, particularly in cases of chronic and severe childhood trauma leading to an unconscious reservoir of murderous rage that is directed at the self. A long-term therapeutic relationship can activate unconscious transferences, leading to the reenactment of previous attachment trauma. We propose that assessments for euthanasia must include a psychological analysis of the unconscious transference, enactment, and countertransference involved. This article presents a hypothetical case example to illustrate how a patient labeled as \"treatment-resistant\" can be supported through a psychodynamic formulation and proposes further pathways for clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":38518,"journal":{"name":"Psychodynamic Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"45-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychodynamic Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/pdps.2025.53.1.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impact of intense countertransference affects in working with patients experiencing complex trauma can have a critical effect on decisions about euthanasia, especially when such decisions are made solely on the grounds of a psychiatric condition. These countertransference dynamics become particularly significant in the context of the rising number of euthanasia requests by psychiatric patients in the Netherlands. We contend that for a subgroup of patients with complex trauma, attachment trauma, and personality disorders, the label "treatment-resistant" may be applied prematurely and incorrectly. This may occur when highly complex transference-countertransference dynamics are not properly assessed, and tertiary treatment options like intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy (ISTDP) are not considered, particularly in cases of chronic and severe childhood trauma leading to an unconscious reservoir of murderous rage that is directed at the self. A long-term therapeutic relationship can activate unconscious transferences, leading to the reenactment of previous attachment trauma. We propose that assessments for euthanasia must include a psychological analysis of the unconscious transference, enactment, and countertransference involved. This article presents a hypothetical case example to illustrate how a patient labeled as "treatment-resistant" can be supported through a psychodynamic formulation and proposes further pathways for clinical decision-making.

谁害怕杀人狂怒?当安乐死与自我毁灭相勾结。
在与经历复杂创伤的病人一起工作时,强烈的反移情影响可能对安乐死的决定产生关键影响,特别是当这种决定仅仅基于精神状况时。在荷兰精神病患者要求安乐死的人数不断增加的背景下,这些反移情的动态变得尤为重要。我们认为,对于患有复杂创伤、依恋创伤和人格障碍的患者亚组,“治疗抵抗”的标签可能被过早和不正确地应用。这种情况可能发生在高度复杂的移情-反移情动力学没有得到适当评估,三级治疗选择,如强化短期动态心理治疗(ISTDP)没有被考虑,特别是在慢性和严重的儿童创伤导致无意识地储存针对自我的杀人愤怒的情况下。长期的治疗关系可以激活无意识的转移,导致以前的依恋创伤的重演。我们建议对安乐死的评估必须包括对无意识移情、实施和反移情的心理分析。本文提出了一个假设的案例,说明如何通过心理动力学公式支持被标记为“治疗抵抗”的患者,并提出了临床决策的进一步途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychodynamic Psychiatry
Psychodynamic Psychiatry Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信