Comparison of the accuracy of procalcitonin, neutrophil CD64, and C-reactive protein for the diagnosis and prognosis of septic patients after antibiotic therapy

IF 1.7 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY

Practical Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00444

Qingteng Zhu , Hui Wang , Liang Chen , Yang Yu , Miao Chen

{"title":"Comparison of the accuracy of procalcitonin, neutrophil CD64, and C-reactive protein for the diagnosis and prognosis of septic patients after antibiotic therapy","authors":"Qingteng Zhu , Hui Wang , Liang Chen , Yang Yu , Miao Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The performance of the inflammatory biomarkers in the management of septic patients who received antimicrobial therapies is largely neglected. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of procalcitonin (PCT), neutrophil CD64 (CD64), and C-reactive protein (CRP) for the diagnosis and prognosis of septic patients after antimicrobial therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study prospectively recruited consecutive patients without infection and those diagnosed with infection but had received initial antimicrobial therapies. Sepsis was diagnosed according to sepsis-3 criteria. Serum PCT, CD64 and CRP levels were measured upon entry to the ICU. We also collected each patient's baseline characteristics. The diagnostic and prognostic performance of these parameters was evaluated from the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 635 consecutive ICU patients were screened for eligible and 289 (45.5 %) patients were diagnosed with sepsis upon entry to the ICU. The area under the curve (AUC) for PCT, CD64 and CRP in the identification of sepsis is 0.726, 0.692 and 0.719, respectively. Neither PCT (p = 0.587) nor CD64 (p = 0.373) is superior to CRP in the diagnosis of septic patients who received antimicrobial therapies. The AUC for PCT, CD64 and CRP in the prediction of ICU mortality in these sepsis patients is 0.702, 0.637 and 0.593, respectively. The prognostic performance of PCT (p = 0.006) rather than CD64 (p = 0.509) is better than CRP.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both PCT and CD64 are not superior to CRP in the identification of septic patients who received antimicrobial therapies. However, PCT instead of CD64 has a better prognostic accuracy than CRP for the prediction of ICU mortality of these septic patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20421,"journal":{"name":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article e00444"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751557/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The performance of the inflammatory biomarkers in the management of septic patients who received antimicrobial therapies is largely neglected. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of procalcitonin (PCT), neutrophil CD64 (CD64), and C-reactive protein (CRP) for the diagnosis and prognosis of septic patients after antimicrobial therapy.

Methods

This study prospectively recruited consecutive patients without infection and those diagnosed with infection but had received initial antimicrobial therapies. Sepsis was diagnosed according to sepsis-3 criteria. Serum PCT, CD64 and CRP levels were measured upon entry to the ICU. We also collected each patient's baseline characteristics. The diagnostic and prognostic performance of these parameters was evaluated from the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC).

Results

A total of 635 consecutive ICU patients were screened for eligible and 289 (45.5 %) patients were diagnosed with sepsis upon entry to the ICU. The area under the curve (AUC) for PCT, CD64 and CRP in the identification of sepsis is 0.726, 0.692 and 0.719, respectively. Neither PCT (p = 0.587) nor CD64 (p = 0.373) is superior to CRP in the diagnosis of septic patients who received antimicrobial therapies. The AUC for PCT, CD64 and CRP in the prediction of ICU mortality in these sepsis patients is 0.702, 0.637 and 0.593, respectively. The prognostic performance of PCT (p = 0.006) rather than CD64 (p = 0.509) is better than CRP.

Conclusions

Both PCT and CD64 are not superior to CRP in the identification of septic patients who received antimicrobial therapies. However, PCT instead of CD64 has a better prognostic accuracy than CRP for the prediction of ICU mortality of these septic patients.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Practical Laboratory Medicine Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

7 weeks

期刊介绍： Practical Laboratory Medicine is a high-quality, peer-reviewed, international open-access journal publishing original research, new methods and critical evaluations, case reports and short papers in the fields of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. The objective of the journal is to provide practical information of immediate relevance to workers in clinical laboratories. The primary scope of the journal covers clinical chemistry, hematology, molecular biology and genetics relevant to laboratory medicine, microbiology, immunology, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory management and informatics. We welcome papers which describe critical evaluations of biomarkers and their role in the diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant disease, validation of commercial and in-house IVD methods, method comparisons, interference reports, the development of new reagents and reference materials, reference range studies and regulatory compliance reports. Manuscripts describing the development of new methods applicable to laboratory medicine (including point-of-care testing) are particularly encouraged, even if preliminary or small scale.