The Gender Disparity in Operative Opportunities for Trainee Surgeons: A Review.

Abstract

Introduction: Assessing gender disparity in surgical trainees' operative opportunities and experience quantifies implicit gender bias and reflects a summation of many smaller biased interactions within the operating room environment. Highlighting gender disparity in surgery informs a platform for advocacy.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using Medline, Web of Science, OpenMD and Science Direct consistent with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metanalysis guidelines. A Boolean search strategy was used to identify articles relevant to gender in operative surgery. Only English language studies that assessed the gender of surgical trainees with regards to operative cases for total and/or autonomously performed case numbers were included.

Results: Fifteen papers assessing the influence of gender on operative opportunities for trainee surgeons were identified. A discrepancy between the operative experiences of men and women trainee surgeons was found. Of eight studies assessing gender differences in total case numbers, four reported women undertaking fewer total cases than men; a similar trend was demonstrated in two studies that failed to reach statistical significance. Eight of eleven studies examining surgical autonomy reported more surgical autonomy afforded to men trainee surgeons than women.

Conclusions: A gendered bias in the operative opportunities afforded to trainee surgeons is suggested in the literature, reflecting implicit bias that underlies surgical culture worldwide. Although surgical specialties continue to have vast gender inequity, we fail to leverage talent and the benefits of diverse skills and experience, to the detriment of ourselves and our patients. Quantifying this issue will inform change.