Disparities in Rehabilitation Services for Victims of Violence.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Megan G Janeway, Ella Cornell, Sophia M Smith, Anne K Buck, Miriam Neufeld, Janice Weinberg, Stephanie D Talutis, Nina Jreige, Victoria Liang, Timothy Munzert, Tracey Dechert, Sabrina E Sanchez, Lisa Allee
{"title":"Disparities in Rehabilitation Services for Victims of Violence.","authors":"Megan G Janeway, Ella Cornell, Sophia M Smith, Anne K Buck, Miriam Neufeld, Janice Weinberg, Stephanie D Talutis, Nina Jreige, Victoria Liang, Timothy Munzert, Tracey Dechert, Sabrina E Sanchez, Lisa Allee","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Access to rehabilitation services after a traumatic injury improves functional outcomes. No study has examined the association between injury intent, violent versus nonviolent, and receipt of rehabilitation services after injury.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of injured adult patients admitted to our level I trauma center from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2021. The primary exposure was violent injury, and the primary outcome was receipt of rehabilitation services upon discharge. An exploratory subgroup analysis evaluated differences in recommended disposition and the reasons for rejection from services.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 7500 patients, 1677 (22.4%) were violently injured and 5823 (77.6%) were nonviolently injured. Patients were 45% White, 67% male, and 52% had public insurance. Adjusting for age, sex, race, ethnicity, injury severity score, insurance, and length of stay, violently injured patients were 77% less likely to receive inpatient rehabilitation (relative risk ratio 0.23 95% confidence interval [0.18, 0.30], P < 0.001) and 46% less likely to have home services (relative risk ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval[0.43, 0.69], P < 0.001). A subgroup analysis (n = 328) demonstrated that violently injured patients were more likely to have a downgrade in discharge recommendation (27.8% versus 9.4%, P = 0.04) and more likely to have an emergency department visit within 30 d (32.0% versus 13.3%, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Violent injury is associated with lower likelihood of receiving rehabilitation services. Subgroup analysis indicates this finding associated with facilities' selection bias, and this warrants additional study. Efforts should focus on protecting victims of violence from discrimination during the rehabilitation screening process.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"306 ","pages":"317-326"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Access to rehabilitation services after a traumatic injury improves functional outcomes. No study has examined the association between injury intent, violent versus nonviolent, and receipt of rehabilitation services after injury.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of injured adult patients admitted to our level I trauma center from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2021. The primary exposure was violent injury, and the primary outcome was receipt of rehabilitation services upon discharge. An exploratory subgroup analysis evaluated differences in recommended disposition and the reasons for rejection from services.

Results: Among 7500 patients, 1677 (22.4%) were violently injured and 5823 (77.6%) were nonviolently injured. Patients were 45% White, 67% male, and 52% had public insurance. Adjusting for age, sex, race, ethnicity, injury severity score, insurance, and length of stay, violently injured patients were 77% less likely to receive inpatient rehabilitation (relative risk ratio 0.23 95% confidence interval [0.18, 0.30], P < 0.001) and 46% less likely to have home services (relative risk ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval[0.43, 0.69], P < 0.001). A subgroup analysis (n = 328) demonstrated that violently injured patients were more likely to have a downgrade in discharge recommendation (27.8% versus 9.4%, P = 0.04) and more likely to have an emergency department visit within 30 d (32.0% versus 13.3%, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Violent injury is associated with lower likelihood of receiving rehabilitation services. Subgroup analysis indicates this finding associated with facilities' selection bias, and this warrants additional study. Efforts should focus on protecting victims of violence from discrimination during the rehabilitation screening process.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信