Visual outcomes, contrast sensitivity and defocus profile with an aspheric monofocal intraocular lens utilizing positive spherical aberration.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Elizabeth M Law, Rajesh K Aggarwal, Phillip J Buckhurst
{"title":"Visual outcomes, contrast sensitivity and defocus profile with an aspheric monofocal intraocular lens utilizing positive spherical aberration.","authors":"Elizabeth M Law, Rajesh K Aggarwal, Phillip J Buckhurst","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate visual outcomes following bilateral implantation of the RayOne EMV intraocular lens with targeted micro-monovision.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Southend Private Hospital, UK.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>50 subjects (100 eyes) assessed at 12 to 18 months post-operatively. Emmetropia was targeted in the dominant eye and myopia of -0.50 to -1.00D in the non-dominant eye. Uncorrected and distance corrected visual acuity was assessed monocularly and binocularly at distance (6m), intermediate (70cm) and near (40cm). Defocus was assessed from +1.50D to -4.00D monocularly and binocularly. Contrast sensitivity was assessed using a computerised Pelli-Robson chart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean Spherical Equivalent (MSE) was -0.05±0.34D and -0.91±0.60D in the dominant and non-dominant eyes respectively. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was significantly different in the dominant (0.08±0.10LogMAR) and non-dominant eye (0.29±0.17LogMAR). (p<0.01). Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), distance corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA) and distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) were similar between eyes. However, significant differences were found between binocular uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) (0.16±0.11LogMAR) and DCIVA (0.31±0.11LogMAR) (p <0.01) also, binocular uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA)(0.30±0.17LogMAR) and DCNVA (0.50±0.19 LogMAR) (p<0.01). The non-dominant eye shows superior acuity eye in both UIVA (p<0.01) and UNVA(p<0.01). Contrast sensitivity showed no significant difference between eyes (p = 0.06). Significant improvement binocularly compared to monocularly was seen through imposed defocus -0.50 to -2.50D.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RayOne EMV with micro-monovision is a reliable method for improving intermediate and near visual acuity, by increasing the range of focus without compromise of distance acuity or contrast sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001612","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate visual outcomes following bilateral implantation of the RayOne EMV intraocular lens with targeted micro-monovision.

Setting: Southend Private Hospital, UK.

Design: Retrospective cohort.

Methods: 50 subjects (100 eyes) assessed at 12 to 18 months post-operatively. Emmetropia was targeted in the dominant eye and myopia of -0.50 to -1.00D in the non-dominant eye. Uncorrected and distance corrected visual acuity was assessed monocularly and binocularly at distance (6m), intermediate (70cm) and near (40cm). Defocus was assessed from +1.50D to -4.00D monocularly and binocularly. Contrast sensitivity was assessed using a computerised Pelli-Robson chart.

Results: Mean Spherical Equivalent (MSE) was -0.05±0.34D and -0.91±0.60D in the dominant and non-dominant eyes respectively. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was significantly different in the dominant (0.08±0.10LogMAR) and non-dominant eye (0.29±0.17LogMAR). (p<0.01). Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), distance corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA) and distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) were similar between eyes. However, significant differences were found between binocular uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) (0.16±0.11LogMAR) and DCIVA (0.31±0.11LogMAR) (p <0.01) also, binocular uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA)(0.30±0.17LogMAR) and DCNVA (0.50±0.19 LogMAR) (p<0.01). The non-dominant eye shows superior acuity eye in both UIVA (p<0.01) and UNVA(p<0.01). Contrast sensitivity showed no significant difference between eyes (p = 0.06). Significant improvement binocularly compared to monocularly was seen through imposed defocus -0.50 to -2.50D.

Conclusion: The RayOne EMV with micro-monovision is a reliable method for improving intermediate and near visual acuity, by increasing the range of focus without compromise of distance acuity or contrast sensitivity.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信