Assessment of the transscleral removal technique for subretinal proliferative tissues during vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1007/s10384-024-01143-6
Tomoyuki Ishibashi, Ryo Inoue, Hiroshi Nakashima, Kazuyuki Emi
{"title":"Assessment of the transscleral removal technique for subretinal proliferative tissues during vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.","authors":"Tomoyuki Ishibashi, Ryo Inoue, Hiroshi Nakashima, Kazuyuki Emi","doi":"10.1007/s10384-024-01143-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To provide insights into the transscleral removal technique for subretinal proliferative tissues (SRP).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective, single-center case series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent transscleral removal of SRP during vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) were included. The preoperative RRD extent, SRP distribution, intraoperative maneuvers, complications, and surgical outcomes were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven eyes of seven patients were enrolled for surgery. The RRD extent involved four quadrants in two eyes, three quadrants in three eyes, and two quadrants in the remaining two eyes. SRP were widely distributed beneath the detached retina in all the cases, with submacular SRP present in six cases. In these six cases, all the SRP, including the submacular SRP, could be removed without creating retinotomies via 1 or 2 subretinal trocars. However, peripheral SRP with extensive and strong adhesion to the retina required multiple retinotomies and conventional bimanual removal in one case. Surgical failure, attributable to the transscleral technique, occurred in one case due to a missed retinal puncture that occurred during subretinal trocar insertion, resulting in recurrent RRD. This patient had RRD within two quadrants, and the subretinal space could not be adequately dilated before insertion. All the patients had achieved retinal reattachment without deterioration of visual acuity at the final follow-up visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The transscleral removal technique was suitable for the removal of SRP, including the posterior pole area, with minimal retinal damage. However, this technique may not be appropriate for SRP removal with extensive and strong adhesions or for cases with relatively nonextensive RRD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14563,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"66-73"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-024-01143-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To provide insights into the transscleral removal technique for subretinal proliferative tissues (SRP).

Study design: Retrospective, single-center case series.

Methods: Patients who underwent transscleral removal of SRP during vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) were included. The preoperative RRD extent, SRP distribution, intraoperative maneuvers, complications, and surgical outcomes were assessed.

Results: Seven eyes of seven patients were enrolled for surgery. The RRD extent involved four quadrants in two eyes, three quadrants in three eyes, and two quadrants in the remaining two eyes. SRP were widely distributed beneath the detached retina in all the cases, with submacular SRP present in six cases. In these six cases, all the SRP, including the submacular SRP, could be removed without creating retinotomies via 1 or 2 subretinal trocars. However, peripheral SRP with extensive and strong adhesion to the retina required multiple retinotomies and conventional bimanual removal in one case. Surgical failure, attributable to the transscleral technique, occurred in one case due to a missed retinal puncture that occurred during subretinal trocar insertion, resulting in recurrent RRD. This patient had RRD within two quadrants, and the subretinal space could not be adequately dilated before insertion. All the patients had achieved retinal reattachment without deterioration of visual acuity at the final follow-up visit.

Conclusion: The transscleral removal technique was suitable for the removal of SRP, including the posterior pole area, with minimal retinal damage. However, this technique may not be appropriate for SRP removal with extensive and strong adhesions or for cases with relatively nonextensive RRD.

孔源性视网膜脱离玻璃体切除术中视网膜下增生性组织经巩膜切除技术的评价。
目的:探讨视网膜下增生性组织(SRP)的经巩膜切除技术。研究设计:回顾性、单中心病例系列。方法:采用玻璃体切除术治疗孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)时经巩膜切除SRP的患者。评估术前RRD程度、SRP分布、术中操作、并发症和手术结果。结果:7例患者7只眼接受手术治疗。RRD范围包括两只眼睛的四个象限,三只眼睛的三个象限,其余两只眼睛的两个象限。所有病例均广泛分布于离体视网膜下,其中6例为黄斑下SRP。在这6例中,所有SRP,包括黄斑下SRP,都可以通过1或2个视网膜下套管去除,而无需进行视网膜切除术。然而,周围性SRP与视网膜广泛而强烈的粘连需要多次视网膜切除术和传统的双手切除1例。经巩膜技术导致的手术失败发生在一例,原因是在视网膜下套管针插入过程中遗漏了视网膜穿刺,导致复发性RRD。该患者有两个象限的RRD,并且在插入前视网膜下空间不能充分扩张。所有患者在最后随访时均实现视网膜再植,视力无下降。结论:经巩膜切除技术适用于包括后极区的SRP切除,且视网膜损伤小。然而,该技术可能不适合具有广泛和强烈粘连的SRP切除或相对非广泛的RRD病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
65
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology (JJO) was inaugurated in 1957 as a quarterly journal published in English by the Ophthalmology Department of the University of Tokyo, with the aim of disseminating the achievements of Japanese ophthalmologists worldwide. JJO remains the only Japanese ophthalmology journal published in English. In 1997, the Japanese Ophthalmological Society assumed the responsibility for publishing the Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology as its official English-language publication. Currently the journal is published bimonthly and accepts papers from authors worldwide. JJO has become an international interdisciplinary forum for the publication of basic science and clinical research papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信