Management and outcome of mesh infection after abdominal wall reconstruction in a tertiary care center.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Hernia Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1007/s10029-025-03265-3
Victor Franchi, Claire Triffault-Fillit, Sophie Jarraud, Jean-Yves Mabrut, Clément Javaux, Olivier Monneuse, Anne Conrad, Tristan Ferry, Maud Robert, Florence Ader, Guillaume Passot, Florent Valour
{"title":"Management and outcome of mesh infection after abdominal wall reconstruction in a tertiary care center.","authors":"Victor Franchi, Claire Triffault-Fillit, Sophie Jarraud, Jean-Yves Mabrut, Clément Javaux, Olivier Monneuse, Anne Conrad, Tristan Ferry, Maud Robert, Florence Ader, Guillaume Passot, Florent Valour","doi":"10.1007/s10029-025-03265-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Abdominal wall reconstruction is a common surgical procedure, with a post-operative risk of mesh-associated infection of which management is poorly known. This study aims to comprehensively analyze clinical and microbiological aspects of mesh infection, treatment modalities, and associated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with abdominal mesh infection were included in a retrospective observational cohort (2010-2023). Patients characteristics and management were described, and determinants for failure were assessed by logistic regression and treatment failure-free survival curve analysis (Kaplan-Meier).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and nine patients (median age, 62 [IQR, 55-71] years) presented a mesh infection occurring within 15 (IQR, 7-31) days after surgery, mainly as an abdominal wall or deep abscess (n=189, 90.4%). Infection was polymicrobial in 89/166 (79.4%) cases, S. aureus (n=60, 36.1%), Enterobacteriaceae (n=60, 36.1%) and anaerobes (n=40, 24.1%) being the most prevalent pathogens. Surgery was performed in 130 (62.2%) patients, associated with a 13.5 (IQR, 8-21) day course of antimicrobial therapy in 172/207 (83.1%) cases. Sixty-three (30.1%) treatment failures occurred, associated with previous multiple abdominal surgeries (OR, 3.305; 95%CI, 1.297-8.425), complete mesh removal (OR, 0.145; 95%CI, 0.063-0.335) and antimicrobial therapy (OR, 0.328; 95%CI, 0.136-0.787). The higher failure rate of conservative strategies was associated with symptom duration >1 month (OR, 3.378; 95%CI, 1.089-4.005) and retromuscular mesh position (OR, 0.444; 95%CI, 0.199-0.992).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mesh infection is associated with high treatment failure rates. Complete mesh removal coupled with targeted antibiotic therapy is associated with better outcomes. Conservative treatment strategies must rely on careful patient selection based on symptom duration and mesh placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":13168,"journal":{"name":"Hernia","volume":"29 1","pages":"76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757931/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hernia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-025-03265-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Abdominal wall reconstruction is a common surgical procedure, with a post-operative risk of mesh-associated infection of which management is poorly known. This study aims to comprehensively analyze clinical and microbiological aspects of mesh infection, treatment modalities, and associated outcomes.

Methods: Patients with abdominal mesh infection were included in a retrospective observational cohort (2010-2023). Patients characteristics and management were described, and determinants for failure were assessed by logistic regression and treatment failure-free survival curve analysis (Kaplan-Meier).

Results: Two hundred and nine patients (median age, 62 [IQR, 55-71] years) presented a mesh infection occurring within 15 (IQR, 7-31) days after surgery, mainly as an abdominal wall or deep abscess (n=189, 90.4%). Infection was polymicrobial in 89/166 (79.4%) cases, S. aureus (n=60, 36.1%), Enterobacteriaceae (n=60, 36.1%) and anaerobes (n=40, 24.1%) being the most prevalent pathogens. Surgery was performed in 130 (62.2%) patients, associated with a 13.5 (IQR, 8-21) day course of antimicrobial therapy in 172/207 (83.1%) cases. Sixty-three (30.1%) treatment failures occurred, associated with previous multiple abdominal surgeries (OR, 3.305; 95%CI, 1.297-8.425), complete mesh removal (OR, 0.145; 95%CI, 0.063-0.335) and antimicrobial therapy (OR, 0.328; 95%CI, 0.136-0.787). The higher failure rate of conservative strategies was associated with symptom duration >1 month (OR, 3.378; 95%CI, 1.089-4.005) and retromuscular mesh position (OR, 0.444; 95%CI, 0.199-0.992).

Conclusion: Mesh infection is associated with high treatment failure rates. Complete mesh removal coupled with targeted antibiotic therapy is associated with better outcomes. Conservative treatment strategies must rely on careful patient selection based on symptom duration and mesh placement.

三级保健中心腹壁重建后补片感染的处理和结果。
目的:腹壁重建是一种常见的外科手术,其术后网状物相关感染的风险尚不清楚。本研究旨在全面分析网状物感染的临床和微生物学方面、治疗方式和相关结果。方法:将腹部补片感染患者纳入回顾性观察队列(2010-2023)。描述患者特征和管理,并通过逻辑回归和治疗无失败生存曲线分析(Kaplan-Meier)评估失败的决定因素。结果:229例患者(中位年龄62岁[IQR, 55-71]岁)术后15天(IQR, 7-31)内出现补片感染,主要表现为腹壁或深部脓肿(n=189, 90.4%)。89/166例(79.4%)为多菌感染,以金黄色葡萄球菌(60例,36.1%)、肠杆菌科(60例,36.1%)和厌氧菌(40例,24.1%)为主。130例(62.2%)患者进行了手术,其中172/207例(83.1%)患者接受了13.5天(8-21天)的抗菌药物治疗。63例(30.1%)治疗失败与既往多次腹部手术相关(OR, 3.305;95%CI, 1.297-8.425),完全去除网片(OR, 0.145;95%CI, 0.063-0.335)和抗菌治疗(OR, 0.328;95%可信区间,0.136 - -0.787)。保守策略失败率越高,症状持续时间越长(OR, 3.378;95%CI, 1.089-4.005)和肌后网位置(OR, 0.444;95%可信区间,0.199 - -0.992)。结论:补片感染与治疗失败率高有关。完全去除补片联合靶向抗生素治疗效果更好。保守治疗策略必须依赖于基于症状持续时间和补片放置的谨慎患者选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hernia
Hernia SURGERY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
26.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hernia was founded in 1997 by Jean P. Chevrel with the purpose of promoting clinical studies and basic research as they apply to groin hernias and the abdominal wall . Since that time, a true revolution in the field of hernia studies has transformed the field from a ”simple” disease to one that is very specialized. While the majority of surgeries for primary inguinal and abdominal wall hernia are performed in hospitals worldwide, complex situations such as multi recurrences, complications, abdominal wall reconstructions and others are being studied and treated in specialist centers. As a result, major institutions and societies are creating specific parameters and criteria to better address the complexities of hernia surgery. Hernia is a journal written by surgeons who have made abdominal wall surgery their specific field of interest, but we will consider publishing content from any surgeon who wishes to improve the science of this field. The Journal aims to ensure that hernia surgery is safer and easier for surgeons as well as patients, and provides a forum to all surgeons in the exchange of new ideas, results, and important research that is the basis of professional activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信