The Early Pharmacological Strategy with Inodilator, bEta-blockers, Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists, Sodium-glucose coTransporter-2 Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor-neprylisin Inhibitors in Acute Heart Failure (PENTA-HF).
Paolo Severino, Andrea D'Amato, Silvia Prosperi, Marco Valerio Mariani, Claudia Cestiè, Vincenzo Myftari, Aurora Labbro Francia, Stefanie Marek-Iannucci, Giovanna Manzi, Domenico Filomena, Viviana Maestrini, Massimo Mancone, Roberto Badagliacca, Carmine Dario Vizza, Francesco Fedele
{"title":"The Early Pharmacological Strategy with Inodilator, bEta-blockers, Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists, Sodium-glucose coTransporter-2 Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor-neprylisin Inhibitors in Acute Heart Failure (PENTA-HF).","authors":"Paolo Severino, Andrea D'Amato, Silvia Prosperi, Marco Valerio Mariani, Claudia Cestiè, Vincenzo Myftari, Aurora Labbro Francia, Stefanie Marek-Iannucci, Giovanna Manzi, Domenico Filomena, Viviana Maestrini, Massimo Mancone, Roberto Badagliacca, Carmine Dario Vizza, Francesco Fedele","doi":"10.2174/0115701611334141241217044516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The management of acute heart failure (AHF) is crucial and challenging. Regarding the use of inotropes, correct patient selection and time of administration are of the essence. We hypothesize that the early use of Levosimendan favouring hemodynamic stabilization and enables rapid optimization of guideline-directed medical treatment (GDMT) in patients with HF, eventually impacting the patient's prognosis during the vulnerable phase.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, observational study enrolled consecutive patients admitted due to AHF. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis has been used to homogenize differences between groups. In group 1 (G1), patients were treated with early 24-h Levosimendan infusion followed by in-hospital introduction/up-titration of GDMT. In group 2 (G2), patients were treated with alternative inotropes/ vasopressors followed by in-hospital introduction/up-titration of GDMT. The comparison between the two groups has been performed at the 6-month follow-up in terms of cardiovascular (CV) mortality and HF hospitalizations (HFH).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>233 patients were included in the present study, and after propensity match adjustments, 176 patients were analysed, 88 patients for each group. No differences in the baseline characteristics have been reported between the groups. At 6 months follow-up, no statistically significant differences were shown in terms of the composite endpoint of CV death and HFH (p= 0.445) and CV death (p=0.62). Statistically significant differences between the two groups were reported in terms of HFH (p= 0.02). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients in G1 were significantly less hospitalized compared to G2 during the 6 months after the index hospitalization (log-rank p= 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early 24-hour infusion of Levosimendan followed by rapid optimization of HF diseasemodifying therapies results in a significant reduction of HFH in the vulnerable post-discharge phase.</p>","PeriodicalId":11278,"journal":{"name":"Current vascular pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current vascular pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115701611334141241217044516","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The management of acute heart failure (AHF) is crucial and challenging. Regarding the use of inotropes, correct patient selection and time of administration are of the essence. We hypothesize that the early use of Levosimendan favouring hemodynamic stabilization and enables rapid optimization of guideline-directed medical treatment (GDMT) in patients with HF, eventually impacting the patient's prognosis during the vulnerable phase.
Methods: This prospective, observational study enrolled consecutive patients admitted due to AHF. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis has been used to homogenize differences between groups. In group 1 (G1), patients were treated with early 24-h Levosimendan infusion followed by in-hospital introduction/up-titration of GDMT. In group 2 (G2), patients were treated with alternative inotropes/ vasopressors followed by in-hospital introduction/up-titration of GDMT. The comparison between the two groups has been performed at the 6-month follow-up in terms of cardiovascular (CV) mortality and HF hospitalizations (HFH).
Results: 233 patients were included in the present study, and after propensity match adjustments, 176 patients were analysed, 88 patients for each group. No differences in the baseline characteristics have been reported between the groups. At 6 months follow-up, no statistically significant differences were shown in terms of the composite endpoint of CV death and HFH (p= 0.445) and CV death (p=0.62). Statistically significant differences between the two groups were reported in terms of HFH (p= 0.02). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients in G1 were significantly less hospitalized compared to G2 during the 6 months after the index hospitalization (log-rank p= 0.03).
Conclusions: Early 24-hour infusion of Levosimendan followed by rapid optimization of HF diseasemodifying therapies results in a significant reduction of HFH in the vulnerable post-discharge phase.
期刊介绍:
Current Vascular Pharmacology publishes clinical and research-based reviews/mini-reviews, original research articles, letters, debates, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited issues to update all those concerned with the treatment of vascular disease, bridging the gap between clinical practice and ongoing research.
Vascular disease is the commonest cause of death in Westernized countries and its incidence is on the increase in developing countries. It follows that considerable research is directed at establishing effective treatment for acute vascular events. Long-term treatment has also received considerable attention (e.g. for symptomatic relief). Furthermore, effective prevention, whether primary or secondary, is backed by the findings of several landmark trials. Vascular disease is a complex field with primary care physicians and nurse practitioners as well as several specialties involved. The latter include cardiology, vascular and cardio thoracic surgery, general medicine, radiology, clinical pharmacology and neurology (stroke units).