From water to land-Usage of Generalized Unified Threshold models of Survival (GUTS) in an above-ground terrestrial context exemplified by honeybee survival data.
{"title":"From water to land-Usage of Generalized Unified Threshold models of Survival (GUTS) in an above-ground terrestrial context exemplified by honeybee survival data.","authors":"Leonhard Urs Bürger, Andreas Focks","doi":"10.1093/etojnl/vgae058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In regulatory aquatic risk assessment, toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic (TKTD) methods, such as the generalized unified threshold model of survival (GUTS), are already established and considered ready for use, whereas TKTD methods for aboveground terrestrial species, like arthropods, are less developed and currently not intended for risk assessment. This could be due to the fact that exposure in aboveground terrestrial systems is more event-based (feeding, contact, overspray, etc.), whereas exposure in aquatic systems is simply related to substance concentrations in the surrounding water. To provide a generic TKTD framework for terrestrial invertebrates, we propose a new GUTS variant that includes an intermediate buffer between the external exposure and inside of the organism. This buffer can be interpreted as residues on the exoskeleton or in the stomach, depending on the uptake route. Such an uptake behavior is mechanistically reasonable and observable in laboratory experiments. This GUTS variant, BufferGUTS, is particularly suitable for discrete or discretized exposure scenarios. Testing our model on honeybee datasets for 13 pesticides reveals a similar or better reproduction of survival curves than existing models (GUTS-RED and BeeGUTS) while keeping the number of parameters the same and making no substance or species-specific assumptions. The proposed new BufferGUTS approach can prospectively be used to derive TKTD parameters for a variety of terrestrial arthropod species. A standardized model definition for terrestrial species will facilitate the comparison and extrapolation of parameters between species and the applicability for terrestrial risk assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":11793,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"589-598"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11816312/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgae058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In regulatory aquatic risk assessment, toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic (TKTD) methods, such as the generalized unified threshold model of survival (GUTS), are already established and considered ready for use, whereas TKTD methods for aboveground terrestrial species, like arthropods, are less developed and currently not intended for risk assessment. This could be due to the fact that exposure in aboveground terrestrial systems is more event-based (feeding, contact, overspray, etc.), whereas exposure in aquatic systems is simply related to substance concentrations in the surrounding water. To provide a generic TKTD framework for terrestrial invertebrates, we propose a new GUTS variant that includes an intermediate buffer between the external exposure and inside of the organism. This buffer can be interpreted as residues on the exoskeleton or in the stomach, depending on the uptake route. Such an uptake behavior is mechanistically reasonable and observable in laboratory experiments. This GUTS variant, BufferGUTS, is particularly suitable for discrete or discretized exposure scenarios. Testing our model on honeybee datasets for 13 pesticides reveals a similar or better reproduction of survival curves than existing models (GUTS-RED and BeeGUTS) while keeping the number of parameters the same and making no substance or species-specific assumptions. The proposed new BufferGUTS approach can prospectively be used to derive TKTD parameters for a variety of terrestrial arthropod species. A standardized model definition for terrestrial species will facilitate the comparison and extrapolation of parameters between species and the applicability for terrestrial risk assessments.
期刊介绍:
The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) publishes two journals: Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (ET&C) and Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is dedicated to furthering scientific knowledge and disseminating information on environmental toxicology and chemistry, including the application of these sciences to risk assessment.[...]
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry is interdisciplinary in scope and integrates the fields of environmental toxicology; environmental, analytical, and molecular chemistry; ecology; physiology; biochemistry; microbiology; genetics; genomics; environmental engineering; chemical, environmental, and biological modeling; epidemiology; and earth sciences. ET&C seeks to publish papers describing original experimental or theoretical work that significantly advances understanding in the area of environmental toxicology, environmental chemistry and hazard/risk assessment. Emphasis is given to papers that enhance capabilities for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of the fate and effects of chemicals in the environment, rather than simply providing additional data. The scientific impact of papers is judged in terms of the breadth and depth of the findings and the expected influence on existing or future scientific practice. Methodological papers must make clear not only how the work differs from existing practice, but the significance of these differences to the field. Site-based research or monitoring must have regional or global implications beyond the particular site, such as evaluating processes, mechanisms, or theory under a natural environmental setting.