Dual-task resistance training improves strength and reduces pain more than resistance exercise alone in elbow fracture rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Carlos Cruz-Montecinos, Laura López-Bueno, Rodrigo Núñez-Cortés, Rubén López-Bueno, Luis Suso-Martí, Guillermo Mendez-Rebolledo, Antoni Morral, Lars Louis Andersen, Joaquín Calatayud
{"title":"Dual-task resistance training improves strength and reduces pain more than resistance exercise alone in elbow fracture rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Carlos Cruz-Montecinos, Laura López-Bueno, Rodrigo Núñez-Cortés, Rubén López-Bueno, Luis Suso-Martí, Guillermo Mendez-Rebolledo, Antoni Morral, Lars Louis Andersen, Joaquín Calatayud","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the effects on strength, pain intensity, range of motion (ROM), and functionality of a 12-week dual-task resistance exercise program in patients undergoing rehabilitation from elbow fractures.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized Controlled Trial SETTING: Rehabilitation hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Individuals undergoing elbow fracture rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Randomization was performed sequentially using numbered envelopes containing assignments to either an intervention group (dual-task resistance training using a mathematical task with self-regulation, n=18) or a control group (traditional resistance training, n=14) for 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Main outcome: </strong>Measures: The primary outcomes were muscle strength for elbow flexors and extensors and pain assessed by the visual analog scale from 0 to 100 mm. The secondary outcomes were kinesiophobia assessed by the Tampa Scale-11 and disability using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and passive ROM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dual-task resistance training improved strength and reduced pain more than resistance training alone (p<0.05), and only the dual-task group improved in kinesiophobia (p<0.05). The linear regression showed a significant negative association between kinesiophobia and increased elbow strength in the dual-task group (flexion, r=-0.53, p=0.024; extension, r=-0.65, p=0.004) but not in the control group (p>0.05). No significant differences were observed between the group for disability and passive ROM (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dual-task resistance training and traditional resistance training both enhance strength, reduce pain, improve functionality, and increase ROM after 12 weeks of elbow fracture rehabilitation. However, dual-task resistance training is superior to resistance training alone in enhancing strength and reducing pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.419","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effects on strength, pain intensity, range of motion (ROM), and functionality of a 12-week dual-task resistance exercise program in patients undergoing rehabilitation from elbow fractures.

Design: Randomized Controlled Trial SETTING: Rehabilitation hospital.

Participants: Individuals undergoing elbow fracture rehabilitation.

Intervention: Randomization was performed sequentially using numbered envelopes containing assignments to either an intervention group (dual-task resistance training using a mathematical task with self-regulation, n=18) or a control group (traditional resistance training, n=14) for 12 weeks.

Main outcome: Measures: The primary outcomes were muscle strength for elbow flexors and extensors and pain assessed by the visual analog scale from 0 to 100 mm. The secondary outcomes were kinesiophobia assessed by the Tampa Scale-11 and disability using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and passive ROM.

Results: Dual-task resistance training improved strength and reduced pain more than resistance training alone (p<0.05), and only the dual-task group improved in kinesiophobia (p<0.05). The linear regression showed a significant negative association between kinesiophobia and increased elbow strength in the dual-task group (flexion, r=-0.53, p=0.024; extension, r=-0.65, p=0.004) but not in the control group (p>0.05). No significant differences were observed between the group for disability and passive ROM (p>0.05).

Conclusions: Dual-task resistance training and traditional resistance training both enhance strength, reduce pain, improve functionality, and increase ROM after 12 weeks of elbow fracture rehabilitation. However, dual-task resistance training is superior to resistance training alone in enhancing strength and reducing pain.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信