Local Adaptive Fusion Regression (LAFR) for Local Linear Multivariate Calibration: Application to Large Datasets.

IF 2.2 3区 化学 Q2 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
Robert Spiers, John H Kalivas
{"title":"Local Adaptive Fusion Regression (LAFR) for Local Linear Multivariate Calibration: Application to Large Datasets.","authors":"Robert Spiers, John H Kalivas","doi":"10.1177/00037028241308538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Impeding linear calibration models from accurately predicting target sample analyte amounts are the target sample-wise deviations in measurement profiles (e.g., spectra) relative to calibration samples. Target sample measurement shifts are due to uncontrollable factors, compositely termed matrix effects, such as temperature, instrument drift, and sample composition divergences relative to analyte and other species amounts altering inter and intramolecular interactions. One approach to circumvent the matrix effect matching problem is to use local modeling where a library with thousands of samples and respective reference analyte values is mined for unique calibration sets matched to each target sample, including analyte amounts between calibration and target samples. Current local modeling methods suffer because it is wrongly assumed similar measurements between calibration and target samples translate to a complete locally matched calibration set. Measurements can be similar, but the underlying matrix effects (and analyte amount) can be drastically different. The presented procedure named local adaptive fusion regression (LAFR) solves this matrix effect matching problem with crucial local modeling paradigm shifts. Expertise with LAFR is unnecessary because input hyperparameters are self-optimized. The capabilities of LAFR to form highly dense localized linear calibration sets matched to target samples spectrally and analyte amounts are verified using a well-studied nonlinear benchmark near-infrared (NIR) meat dataset, a NIR sugarcane dataset covering four major process steps with multiple subgroups within, and a NIR soil database of 98 910 samples spanning the contiguous USA. While LAFR is tested on NIR datasets, it is applicable to other measurement systems affected by matrix effects in a broad sense.</p>","PeriodicalId":8253,"journal":{"name":"Applied Spectroscopy","volume":" ","pages":"37028241308538"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Spectroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00037028241308538","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Impeding linear calibration models from accurately predicting target sample analyte amounts are the target sample-wise deviations in measurement profiles (e.g., spectra) relative to calibration samples. Target sample measurement shifts are due to uncontrollable factors, compositely termed matrix effects, such as temperature, instrument drift, and sample composition divergences relative to analyte and other species amounts altering inter and intramolecular interactions. One approach to circumvent the matrix effect matching problem is to use local modeling where a library with thousands of samples and respective reference analyte values is mined for unique calibration sets matched to each target sample, including analyte amounts between calibration and target samples. Current local modeling methods suffer because it is wrongly assumed similar measurements between calibration and target samples translate to a complete locally matched calibration set. Measurements can be similar, but the underlying matrix effects (and analyte amount) can be drastically different. The presented procedure named local adaptive fusion regression (LAFR) solves this matrix effect matching problem with crucial local modeling paradigm shifts. Expertise with LAFR is unnecessary because input hyperparameters are self-optimized. The capabilities of LAFR to form highly dense localized linear calibration sets matched to target samples spectrally and analyte amounts are verified using a well-studied nonlinear benchmark near-infrared (NIR) meat dataset, a NIR sugarcane dataset covering four major process steps with multiple subgroups within, and a NIR soil database of 98 910 samples spanning the contiguous USA. While LAFR is tested on NIR datasets, it is applicable to other measurement systems affected by matrix effects in a broad sense.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Spectroscopy
Applied Spectroscopy 工程技术-光谱学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Applied Spectroscopy is one of the world''s leading spectroscopy journals, publishing high-quality peer-reviewed articles, both fundamental and applied, covering all aspects of spectroscopy. Established in 1951, the journal is owned by the Society for Applied Spectroscopy and is published monthly. The journal is dedicated to fulfilling the mission of the Society to “…advance and disseminate knowledge and information concerning the art and science of spectroscopy and other allied sciences.”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信