Martin Kauke-Navarro, William J Crisler, Nour Younis, Radhika S Khetani, Sam Sadigh, Jessica E Teague, Shannan J Ho Sui, Christine Ko, Qian Zhan, Samuel Steuart, Nathaniel S Treister, Jordan Pober, Jamil Azzi, Rachael A Clark, Bohdan Pomahac
{"title":"B-cell infiltration distinguishes mucosal from skin patterns of rejection in facial vascularized composite allografts.","authors":"Martin Kauke-Navarro, William J Crisler, Nour Younis, Radhika S Khetani, Sam Sadigh, Jessica E Teague, Shannan J Ho Sui, Christine Ko, Qian Zhan, Samuel Steuart, Nathaniel S Treister, Jordan Pober, Jamil Azzi, Rachael A Clark, Bohdan Pomahac","doi":"10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rejection monitoring in facial vascularized composite allotransplantation (fVCA) traditionally focuses on skin biopsies. However, mucosal rejection frequently presents with more pronounced signs of immune activity. To explore mechanistic differences between skin and mucosal rejection, rejection and non-rejection biopsies from allograft skin and oral mucosa of nine fVCA recipients were retrospectively analyzed using histology, multiplex immunostaining, and gene expression profiling, with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) quantified via mass cytometry (CyTOF). Both skin and mucosa exhibited similar patterns of granzyme B expressing (GZMB<sup>+</sup>) T-cells, indicating T-cell-mediated rejection in both tissues. However, mucosa demonstrated additional CD19<sup>+</sup> B-cell infiltration and occasional plasma cells, which were absent in skin. These intramucosal B-cells expressed AHNAK and CD43, suggesting they may be innate-like B-cells (Bin cells). CD8<sup>+</sup>/GZMB<sup>+</sup> cells and B-cell populations were enriched in PBMCs during combined skin and mucosal rejection but not isolated skin rejection. These findings suggest distinct rejection mechanisms in skin and mucosa, with mucosa uniquely involving B-cells. Current skin-focused rejection monitoring may overlook important mucosal rejection events, emphasizing the need to monitor both tissues concurrently. Mucosal biopsies could improve the accuracy in detecting acute rejection.</p>","PeriodicalId":123,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rejection monitoring in facial vascularized composite allotransplantation (fVCA) traditionally focuses on skin biopsies. However, mucosal rejection frequently presents with more pronounced signs of immune activity. To explore mechanistic differences between skin and mucosal rejection, rejection and non-rejection biopsies from allograft skin and oral mucosa of nine fVCA recipients were retrospectively analyzed using histology, multiplex immunostaining, and gene expression profiling, with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) quantified via mass cytometry (CyTOF). Both skin and mucosa exhibited similar patterns of granzyme B expressing (GZMB+) T-cells, indicating T-cell-mediated rejection in both tissues. However, mucosa demonstrated additional CD19+ B-cell infiltration and occasional plasma cells, which were absent in skin. These intramucosal B-cells expressed AHNAK and CD43, suggesting they may be innate-like B-cells (Bin cells). CD8+/GZMB+ cells and B-cell populations were enriched in PBMCs during combined skin and mucosal rejection but not isolated skin rejection. These findings suggest distinct rejection mechanisms in skin and mucosa, with mucosa uniquely involving B-cells. Current skin-focused rejection monitoring may overlook important mucosal rejection events, emphasizing the need to monitor both tissues concurrently. Mucosal biopsies could improve the accuracy in detecting acute rejection.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Transplantation is a leading journal in the field of transplantation. It serves as a forum for debate and reassessment, an agent of change, and a major platform for promoting understanding, improving results, and advancing science. Published monthly, it provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians worldwide.
The journal publishes original articles, case reports, invited reviews, letters to the editor, critical reviews, news features, consensus documents, and guidelines over 12 issues a year. It covers all major subject areas in transplantation, including thoracic (heart, lung), abdominal (kidney, liver, pancreas, islets), tissue and stem cell transplantation, organ and tissue donation and preservation, tissue injury, repair, inflammation, and aging, histocompatibility, drugs and pharmacology, graft survival, and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure. It also explores ethical and social issues in the field.