Zirconia Barriers in Bone Regeneration Procedures: A Scoping Review

IF 4.8 1区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Clinical Oral Implants Research Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1111/clr.14404

Xavier Uriarte, Andrés Landázuri, Heloisa Fonseca Marão, Natália Lucena, Eik Schiegnitz, Leonardo Díaz

{"title":"Zirconia Barriers in Bone Regeneration Procedures: A Scoping Review","authors":"Xavier Uriarte, Andrés Landázuri, Heloisa Fonseca Marão, Natália Lucena, Eik Schiegnitz, Leonardo Díaz","doi":"10.1111/clr.14404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeTo identify the current status and development of zirconia barriers in bone augmentation procedures in the maxillofacial area of adult human patients.Materials and MethodsTwo independent reviewers conducted an electronic literature search in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCO, the Cochrane Library, and LILACS databases, as well as a manual search to identify eligible clinical studies up to April 15, 2024. The protocol was designed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines.ResultsThe initial electronic search resulted in 240 studies. The systematic application of inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in 6 articles that met the purpose of the study. The included articles were 5 clinical case series and 1 case report, published between 2016 and 2023. Only 4 articles reported histological studies. A total of 40 sites regenerated with zirconium barriers were reported in 30 patients. Results were obtained with variability in bone gain values, between 0.9–8.0 mm horizontally and 1.4–12.0 mm vertically, in addition to a 30% complication rate.ConclusionsAlthough the results obtained in the studies included in this scoping review are favorable with respect to the amount of bone formation and the reduced surgical time required, the number of complications is considered high. Moreover, due to a limited number of patients included in the case series and the short duration of follow‐up, additional studies including a control group are required.","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14404","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeTo identify the current status and development of zirconia barriers in bone augmentation procedures in the maxillofacial area of adult human patients.Materials and MethodsTwo independent reviewers conducted an electronic literature search in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, EBSCO, the Cochrane Library, and LILACS databases, as well as a manual search to identify eligible clinical studies up to April 15, 2024. The protocol was designed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines.ResultsThe initial electronic search resulted in 240 studies. The systematic application of inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in 6 articles that met the purpose of the study. The included articles were 5 clinical case series and 1 case report, published between 2016 and 2023. Only 4 articles reported histological studies. A total of 40 sites regenerated with zirconium barriers were reported in 30 patients. Results were obtained with variability in bone gain values, between 0.9–8.0 mm horizontally and 1.4–12.0 mm vertically, in addition to a 30% complication rate.ConclusionsAlthough the results obtained in the studies included in this scoping review are favorable with respect to the amount of bone formation and the reduced surgical time required, the number of complications is considered high. Moreover, due to a limited number of patients included in the case series and the short duration of follow‐up, additional studies including a control group are required.

查看原文本刊更多论文

氧化锆屏障在骨再生程序：一个范围审查

目的了解成人颌面骨增强术中氧化锆屏障的现状及发展。材料和方法两位独立审稿人在PubMed/MEDLINE、Web of Science、Scopus、EBSCO、Cochrane Library和LILACS数据库中进行了电子文献检索，并进行了人工检索，以确定截止到2024年4月15日的符合条件的临床研究。该方案是根据系统评价的首选报告项目和范围评价的Meta分析扩展指南设计的。结果最初的电子检索结果为240项研究。纳入和排除标准的系统应用导致6篇文章符合研究目的。纳入的文章为2016 - 2023年间发表的5篇临床病例系列和1篇病例报告。只有4篇文章报道了组织学研究。在30例患者中，共报道了用锆屏障再生的40个部位。结果显示，骨增重值存在差异，水平方向为0.9-8.0 mm，垂直方向为1.4-12.0 mm，并发症发生率为30%。结论：虽然本综述所涉及的研究结果在骨形成量和所需手术时间减少方面是有利的，但并发症的数量被认为很高。此外，由于病例系列中纳入的患者数量有限，随访时间短，需要进行包括对照组在内的额外研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Clinical Oral Implants Research 医学-工程：生物医学

CiteScore

7.70

自引率

11.60%

发文量

149

审稿时长

3 months

期刊介绍： Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.