Rajkumar Dhakar , Basavaraj R. Amogi , Gajanan S. Kothawade , Lav R. Khot
{"title":"Simplified mechanistic model for estimating leaf wetness","authors":"Rajkumar Dhakar , Basavaraj R. Amogi , Gajanan S. Kothawade , Lav R. Khot","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study aimed to develop a simplified mechanistic leaf wetness estimation model (SMLW) to support risk assessment of insect pests and diseases in irrigated specialty crops grown in the state of Washington, and around globe. Employing the energy balance and water budget approach, two variants of SMLW models (M1: SMLW and M2: SMLW<sub>DPD</sub>) were developed using historical data from ten randomly selected automated weather stations in the Washington State University — AgWeatherNet ecosystem. Both variants simulate dewfall, rainfall interception, and evaporation processes; however, SMLW<sub>DPD</sub> incorporates dew point depression (DPD) as an additional constraint. Both models enabled estimation of leaf wetness (LW, mm) and leaf wetness duration (LWD, h, defined as the duration when LW > 0). The model input parameters were optimized through the Bayesian method and Morris's sensitivity index. For comparison, LWD was also estimated following existing empirical approaches based on constant DPD (M3) and relative humidity (M4). The LWD estimates from all four models were finally evaluated against actual historical leaf wetness sensor data. Results indicated that SMLW and SMLW<sub>DPD</sub> outperform M3 and M4 in estimating daily LWD. With relatively higher precision and recall, SMLW<sub>DPD</sub> exhibited higher coefficient of determination (0.84) with root mean squared (RMSE) and absolute error (MAE) of 1.13 h and 0.34 h, respectively. Whereas, both M3 and M4 had MAE of 10.16 h and 7.03 h, respectively. Overall, SMLW<sub>DPD</sub> model could be a viable option to reliably estimate leaf wetness using typical weather variables and reducing reliance on intricate inputs such as net radiation and leaf area index. Tied with other weather variables like degree days, LWD estimated using SMLW<sub>DPD</sub> can be an effective decision support for growers in determining optimal timing and frequency of sprays to manage insect pests and disease pressure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"363 ","pages":"Article 110399"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016819232500019X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a simplified mechanistic leaf wetness estimation model (SMLW) to support risk assessment of insect pests and diseases in irrigated specialty crops grown in the state of Washington, and around globe. Employing the energy balance and water budget approach, two variants of SMLW models (M1: SMLW and M2: SMLWDPD) were developed using historical data from ten randomly selected automated weather stations in the Washington State University — AgWeatherNet ecosystem. Both variants simulate dewfall, rainfall interception, and evaporation processes; however, SMLWDPD incorporates dew point depression (DPD) as an additional constraint. Both models enabled estimation of leaf wetness (LW, mm) and leaf wetness duration (LWD, h, defined as the duration when LW > 0). The model input parameters were optimized through the Bayesian method and Morris's sensitivity index. For comparison, LWD was also estimated following existing empirical approaches based on constant DPD (M3) and relative humidity (M4). The LWD estimates from all four models were finally evaluated against actual historical leaf wetness sensor data. Results indicated that SMLW and SMLWDPD outperform M3 and M4 in estimating daily LWD. With relatively higher precision and recall, SMLWDPD exhibited higher coefficient of determination (0.84) with root mean squared (RMSE) and absolute error (MAE) of 1.13 h and 0.34 h, respectively. Whereas, both M3 and M4 had MAE of 10.16 h and 7.03 h, respectively. Overall, SMLWDPD model could be a viable option to reliably estimate leaf wetness using typical weather variables and reducing reliance on intricate inputs such as net radiation and leaf area index. Tied with other weather variables like degree days, LWD estimated using SMLWDPD can be an effective decision support for growers in determining optimal timing and frequency of sprays to manage insect pests and disease pressure.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published.
Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.