Brachial Artery Access for Carotid Artery Stenting: A Pooled Analysis.

Marcelo Porto Sousa, Sávio Batista, Guilherme Melo Silva, Márcio Yuri Ferreira, Leonardo Oliveira Brenner, José Victor Dantas dos Santos, Raphael Muszkat Besborodco, Filipi Fim Andreão, Agostinho C Pinheiro, Raphael Bertani, José Alberto Almeida Filho
{"title":"Brachial Artery Access for Carotid Artery Stenting: A Pooled Analysis.","authors":"Marcelo Porto Sousa, Sávio Batista, Guilherme Melo Silva, Márcio Yuri Ferreira, Leonardo Oliveira Brenner, José Victor Dantas dos Santos, Raphael Muszkat Besborodco, Filipi Fim Andreão, Agostinho C Pinheiro, Raphael Bertani, José Alberto Almeida Filho","doi":"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.46534-24.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the potential of transbrachial access (TBA) in carotid artery stenting (CAS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the safety and efficacy of TBA for CAS by conducting a thorough search on Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Studies reporting TBA for CAS and evaluating primary outcomes such as good neurological results, procedural success, and complications were included. Studies with fewer than 4 patients were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a meticulous selection of 1837 literature articles, 11 studies were meticulously chosen for the comprehensive examination, involving a total of 273 patients. The analysis of nine studies revealed a consistent 100% procedural success rate with minimal variability (95% CI: 98% to 100%). In the final assessment of neurological status across eight studies, good neurological outcomes were observed in 99% (95% CI: 98% to 100%). Additionally, nineteen complications were identified, leading to a 1% rate (95% CI: 0% to 9%). Among the 223 patients in eight studies, resulting in a pooled estimate of 0% mortality (95% CI: 0% to 1%), indicating a favorable safety profile.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of TBA for CAS demonstrate a highly effective and safe procedure. Despite the limitations, TBA can be an option in patients with no other access available, and further comparative studies are required to establish definitive conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94381,"journal":{"name":"Turkish neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"3-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.46534-24.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To examine the potential of transbrachial access (TBA) in carotid artery stenting (CAS).

Material and methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the safety and efficacy of TBA for CAS by conducting a thorough search on Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Studies reporting TBA for CAS and evaluating primary outcomes such as good neurological results, procedural success, and complications were included. Studies with fewer than 4 patients were excluded.

Results: After a meticulous selection of 1837 literature articles, 11 studies were meticulously chosen for the comprehensive examination, involving a total of 273 patients. The analysis of nine studies revealed a consistent 100% procedural success rate with minimal variability (95% CI: 98% to 100%). In the final assessment of neurological status across eight studies, good neurological outcomes were observed in 99% (95% CI: 98% to 100%). Additionally, nineteen complications were identified, leading to a 1% rate (95% CI: 0% to 9%). Among the 223 patients in eight studies, resulting in a pooled estimate of 0% mortality (95% CI: 0% to 1%), indicating a favorable safety profile.

Conclusion: The results of TBA for CAS demonstrate a highly effective and safe procedure. Despite the limitations, TBA can be an option in patients with no other access available, and further comparative studies are required to establish definitive conclusions.

颈动脉支架置入的肱动脉通路:一项汇总分析。
在颈动脉支架植入术(CAS)领域,有多种通路,如经股动脉(TFA)、经桡动脉(TRA)和经肱动脉(TBA)。虽然TFA被广泛建立,但TRA和TBA提供了其他选择。TBA缺乏全面的研究,明显缺乏全面的证据系统地评价其结果。材料和方法本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在通过对Medline、Cochrane Library、Embase和Web of Science数据库的全面检索,全面评价TBA治疗CAS的安全性和有效性。研究报告了TBA治疗CAS,并评估了主要结果,如良好的神经学结果、手术成功和并发症。少于4例患者的研究被排除在外。结果经过对1837篇文献的精心筛选,我们精心挑选了11篇研究进行综合检查,共涉及273例患者。对9项研究的分析显示,手术成功率为100%,变异性最小(95% CI: 98%至100%)。在8项研究中对神经状态的最终评估中,99%的人观察到良好的神经预后(95% CI: 98%至100%)。此外,19例并发症被确定,导致1%的发生率(95% CI: 0%至9%)。在8项研究的223名患者中,得出的合并估计死亡率为0% (95% CI: 0%至1%),表明良好的安全性。结论TBA治疗CAS是一种安全有效的治疗方法。尽管有局限性,TBA可以作为无其他途径的患者的一种选择,需要进一步的比较研究来建立明确的结论。关键词:肱,颈动脉,颈动脉支架植入术,支架,经肱
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信