Management of Nausea and Vomiting in Palliative Care - Real Life Data From a Palliative Care Unit in Germany.

Jennifer Marie Berner-Sharma, Claudia Bausewein, Constanze Rémi
{"title":"Management of Nausea and Vomiting in Palliative Care - Real Life Data From a Palliative Care Unit in Germany.","authors":"Jennifer Marie Berner-Sharma, Claudia Bausewein, Constanze Rémi","doi":"10.1177/10499091251313757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nausea and vomiting significantly impact the quality of life in palliative care. Due to various underlying causes, treatment approaches vary. However, scientific evidence on pharmacotherapeutic management is limited, complicating treatment decisions. Objective is to assess the current antiemetic treatment approach in palliative care in Germany.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study (15 months) was conducted, evaluating clinical records of adult patients admitted to palliative care in a German hospital. Symptom burden (Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS®)), suspected aetiology, antiemetics, treatment quality and drug-related problems (DRPs) were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 330 patients (median age 71 years, 50.9% female), of which 172 (52%) experienced nausea/vomiting in 230 treatment episodes. Symptoms were more prevalent in cancer-patients (<i>P</i> = 0.002) and women (<i>P</i> = 0.002). Main aetiologies were intestinal obstruction (59/230, 25.7%), hypomotility (31/230, 16.1%), and raised intracranial pressure (23/230, 10.0%). Nearly 70% experienced a reduction of symptom burden within the first 3 days, with faster symptom relief and shorter episodes in cancer patients compared to non-cancer patients (median length 3d vs 2d). DRPs were documented in 213/230 episodes (92.6%), indicating high interaction potential of antiemetics (87.4%). Manifest DRPs affected patients due to ineffective treatment (29.0%) or side effects (6.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One-third experienced inadequate symptom control with the current treatment, underscoring the complexity of managing nausea/vomiting in palliative care and the need for a systematic approach. This study emphasizes the importance of evidence-based guidelines and further research into underutilized antiemetics, along with improved medical education in an interdisciplinary team to enhance treatment quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"10499091251313757"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251313757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nausea and vomiting significantly impact the quality of life in palliative care. Due to various underlying causes, treatment approaches vary. However, scientific evidence on pharmacotherapeutic management is limited, complicating treatment decisions. Objective is to assess the current antiemetic treatment approach in palliative care in Germany.

Methods: A retrospective observational study (15 months) was conducted, evaluating clinical records of adult patients admitted to palliative care in a German hospital. Symptom burden (Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS®)), suspected aetiology, antiemetics, treatment quality and drug-related problems (DRPs) were evaluated.

Results: We included 330 patients (median age 71 years, 50.9% female), of which 172 (52%) experienced nausea/vomiting in 230 treatment episodes. Symptoms were more prevalent in cancer-patients (P = 0.002) and women (P = 0.002). Main aetiologies were intestinal obstruction (59/230, 25.7%), hypomotility (31/230, 16.1%), and raised intracranial pressure (23/230, 10.0%). Nearly 70% experienced a reduction of symptom burden within the first 3 days, with faster symptom relief and shorter episodes in cancer patients compared to non-cancer patients (median length 3d vs 2d). DRPs were documented in 213/230 episodes (92.6%), indicating high interaction potential of antiemetics (87.4%). Manifest DRPs affected patients due to ineffective treatment (29.0%) or side effects (6.5%).

Conclusions: One-third experienced inadequate symptom control with the current treatment, underscoring the complexity of managing nausea/vomiting in palliative care and the need for a systematic approach. This study emphasizes the importance of evidence-based guidelines and further research into underutilized antiemetics, along with improved medical education in an interdisciplinary team to enhance treatment quality.

在姑息治疗中恶心和呕吐的管理-来自德国姑息治疗单位的真实生活数据。
背景:恶心和呕吐显著影响姑息治疗的生活质量。由于各种潜在原因,治疗方法各不相同。然而,关于药物治疗管理的科学证据有限,使治疗决策复杂化。目的是评估目前止吐治疗方法在德国姑息治疗。方法:回顾性观察研究(15个月)进行,评估在德国一家医院接受姑息治疗的成年患者的临床记录。评估症状负担(综合姑息治疗结局量表(IPOS®))、疑似病因、止吐药、治疗质量和药物相关问题(DRPs)。结果:我们纳入330例患者(中位年龄71岁,50.9%为女性),其中172例(52%)在230次治疗中出现恶心/呕吐。症状在癌症患者(P = 0.002)和女性(P = 0.002)中更为普遍。主要病因为肠梗阻(59/230,25.7%)、动力低下(31/230,16.1%)、颅内压升高(23/230,10.0%)。近70%的患者在前3天内症状负担减轻,与非癌症患者相比,癌症患者的症状缓解更快,发作时间更短(中位时间为3d vs 2d)。有213/230例(92.6%)发生drp,表明止吐药有很高的相互作用潜力(87.4%)。明显的DRPs患者是由于治疗无效(29.0%)或副作用(6.5%)造成的。结论:三分之一的患者在目前的治疗中症状控制不足,强调了姑息治疗中控制恶心/呕吐的复杂性和系统方法的必要性。本研究强调了循证指南和进一步研究未充分利用的止吐药的重要性,以及在跨学科团队中改进医学教育以提高治疗质量的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信