Measurement and interpretation of the Harare HIV combination prevention cascade in priority populations: A population survey of adolescent girls and young women and young men in Zimbabwe.

Louisa Moorhouse, Jeffrey W Imai-Eaton, Tawanda Dadirai, Rufurwokuda Maswera, Tafadzwa Museka, Phyllis Mandizvidza, Freedom Dzamatira, Blessing Tsenesa, Timothy B Hallett, Constance Nyamukapa, Simon Gregson
{"title":"Measurement and interpretation of the Harare HIV combination prevention cascade in priority populations: A population survey of adolescent girls and young women and young men in Zimbabwe.","authors":"Louisa Moorhouse, Jeffrey W Imai-Eaton, Tawanda Dadirai, Rufurwokuda Maswera, Tafadzwa Museka, Phyllis Mandizvidza, Freedom Dzamatira, Blessing Tsenesa, Timothy B Hallett, Constance Nyamukapa, Simon Gregson","doi":"10.1101/2025.01.08.25320195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>HIV-negative adolescent girls and young women (AGYW), and male partners, have disproportionately high HIV incidence in many African countries. We used a new HIV Prevention Cascade (HPC) approach to quantify levels of, and barriers to, prevention method use to guide interventions to increase effective uptake of primary HIV prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the Manicaland HPC pilot study (2018-19; N=9803) in Zimbabwe were used to measure levels of sexual risk behaviour and construct HPCs for male condom, PrEP (females), VMMC (males) and combination prevention use by HIV-negative sexually-active AGYW (15-24-years) and male partners (15-29-years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>19% of AGYW (N=1140) and 37% of young men (N=955) who had started sex reported one or more HIV risk behaviour and met the definition of the priority populations for HIV prevention. Of these, 63% of females and 87% of males were motivated to use an HIV prevention method, 28% and 63% had access to a method, and 16% and 53% used a method. Male condoms were the most commonly used prevention method, accounting for 97% of use in females and 55% in males. Barriers to motivation, access and capacity to use were reported for all priority populations and methods. Some barriers were common across HPCs (e.g. lack of risk perception, social unacceptability, and lack of acceptable provision); others were specific to particular prevention methods or priority populations (e.g. lack of availability).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HIV risk behaviours were commonly reported, but use of prevention methods is low in young people in Manicaland. Population survey measurements of HPCs revealed large gaps in all steps in the cascade (lack of motivation, lack of access and lack of capacity to use prevention) but also provided information on the reasons for these gaps that can aid in designing interventions that reduce new infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11741482/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.08.25320195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: HIV-negative adolescent girls and young women (AGYW), and male partners, have disproportionately high HIV incidence in many African countries. We used a new HIV Prevention Cascade (HPC) approach to quantify levels of, and barriers to, prevention method use to guide interventions to increase effective uptake of primary HIV prevention.

Methods: Data from the Manicaland HPC pilot study (2018-19; N=9803) in Zimbabwe were used to measure levels of sexual risk behaviour and construct HPCs for male condom, PrEP (females), VMMC (males) and combination prevention use by HIV-negative sexually-active AGYW (15-24-years) and male partners (15-29-years).

Results: 19% of AGYW (N=1140) and 37% of young men (N=955) who had started sex reported one or more HIV risk behaviour and met the definition of the priority populations for HIV prevention. Of these, 63% of females and 87% of males were motivated to use an HIV prevention method, 28% and 63% had access to a method, and 16% and 53% used a method. Male condoms were the most commonly used prevention method, accounting for 97% of use in females and 55% in males. Barriers to motivation, access and capacity to use were reported for all priority populations and methods. Some barriers were common across HPCs (e.g. lack of risk perception, social unacceptability, and lack of acceptable provision); others were specific to particular prevention methods or priority populations (e.g. lack of availability).

Conclusion: HIV risk behaviours were commonly reported, but use of prevention methods is low in young people in Manicaland. Population survey measurements of HPCs revealed large gaps in all steps in the cascade (lack of motivation, lack of access and lack of capacity to use prevention) but also provided information on the reasons for these gaps that can aid in designing interventions that reduce new infections.

重点人群中哈拉雷艾滋病毒综合预防级联的测量和解释:对津巴布韦少女、青年妇女和青年男子的人口调查。
在许多非洲国家,艾滋病毒阴性的少女和年轻妇女以及男性伴侣的艾滋病毒发病率高得不成比例。我们使用了一种新的HIV预防级联(HPC)方法来量化预防方法的水平和障碍,以指导干预措施,以提高对HIV初级预防的有效吸收。方法:数据来自Manicaland HPC试点研究(2018-19);N=9803)用于测量津巴布韦的性风险行为水平,并构建艾滋病毒阴性性活跃AGYW(15-24岁)和男性伴侣(15-29岁)使用男用安全套、PrEP(女性)、VMMC(男性)和联合预防的HPCs。结果:19%的老年妇女(N=1140)和37%的开始性行为的年轻男性(N=955)报告了一种或多种艾滋病毒危险行为,符合艾滋病毒预防重点人群的定义。其中,63%的女性和87%的男性有动机使用艾滋病毒预防方法,28%和63%的人能够获得一种方法,16%和53%的人使用了一种方法。男用避孕套是最常用的预防方法,占女性使用率的97%,占男性使用率的55%。报告了所有优先人群和方法在动机、获取和使用能力方面存在的障碍。一些障碍在hpc中是常见的(例如缺乏风险认知、社会不接受和缺乏可接受的供应);其他则是针对特定的预防方法或重点人群(例如缺乏可用性)。结论:艾滋病毒危险行为普遍报告,但预防方法的使用在马尼加莱年轻人中很低。高收入国家的人口调查测量结果显示,在所有步骤中都存在巨大差距(缺乏动机、缺乏获取和缺乏使用预防措施的能力),但也提供了关于这些差距原因的信息,有助于设计减少新感染的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信