Primary Dentin Conditioning with Methylene Blue Activated Photodynamic Therapy, Phytic Acid, and Er,Cr:YSGG to Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Comparison to Conventional Polyacrylic Acid.

IF 1.8 Q2 SURGERY
Faisal Ali Bin Abbooud AlQhtani, Fayez Hussain Niazi, Sadatullah Syed, Shan Sainudeen, Muhammad Abdullah Kamran, Lujain Sultan Alzuman, Atheer Majid Bin Saidan, Azza A Abushama
{"title":"Primary Dentin Conditioning with Methylene Blue Activated Photodynamic Therapy, Phytic Acid, and Er,Cr:YSGG to Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Comparison to Conventional Polyacrylic Acid.","authors":"Faisal Ali Bin Abbooud AlQhtani, Fayez Hussain Niazi, Sadatullah Syed, Shan Sainudeen, Muhammad Abdullah Kamran, Lujain Sultan Alzuman, Atheer Majid Bin Saidan, Azza A Abushama","doi":"10.1089/photob.2024.0116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Aim:</i></b> Impact of surface conditioner phytic acid (IP6) Er,Cr:YSGG laser (ECYL) methylene blue photodynamic therapy (MB-PDT) on the microleakage and shear bond strength (SBS) of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) to primary sound dentin. <b><i>Material and method:</i></b> Overall, 80 extracted sound primary molars were collected followed by their submergence in self-cure acrylic resin. The dentin surface was exposed and made flat and was assigned into four groups based on the surface conditioning. Group 1: polyacrylic acid (PAA), Group 2: 1% IP6, Group 3: ECYL, and Group 4: MB-PDT. RMGIC restorative material was bonded to primary dentin. Marginal leakage assessment was performed using silver nitrate. SBS and failure mode assessment were performed using a universal testing machine and stereomicroscope. Mean and standard deviations of SBS and marginal leakage were compared using analysis of variance and multiple comparisons of Tukey's post-hoc test <i>(p</i> < 0.05). <b><i>Results:</i></b> MB-PDT treated specimens displayed the highest values of marginal leakage (37.56 ± 1.25 nm) and lowest SBS (7.93 ± 1.03 MPa). However, samples in Group 2 conditioned with IP6 presented the lowest dye penetration score (11.23 ± 1.22 nm) and highest bond strength scores (11.12 ± 0.82 MPa). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> IP6 and ECYL have proved to be better alternatives in terms of low microleakage and improved SBS scores to PAA as a primary dentin surface conditioner for bonding RMGIC restoration. Conversely, MB-PDT, when employed as a dentin surface conditioner for RMGIC restorations, exhibited suboptimal results, characterized by elevated microleakage and compromised bond strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":94169,"journal":{"name":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2024.0116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Impact of surface conditioner phytic acid (IP6) Er,Cr:YSGG laser (ECYL) methylene blue photodynamic therapy (MB-PDT) on the microleakage and shear bond strength (SBS) of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) to primary sound dentin. Material and method: Overall, 80 extracted sound primary molars were collected followed by their submergence in self-cure acrylic resin. The dentin surface was exposed and made flat and was assigned into four groups based on the surface conditioning. Group 1: polyacrylic acid (PAA), Group 2: 1% IP6, Group 3: ECYL, and Group 4: MB-PDT. RMGIC restorative material was bonded to primary dentin. Marginal leakage assessment was performed using silver nitrate. SBS and failure mode assessment were performed using a universal testing machine and stereomicroscope. Mean and standard deviations of SBS and marginal leakage were compared using analysis of variance and multiple comparisons of Tukey's post-hoc test (p < 0.05). Results: MB-PDT treated specimens displayed the highest values of marginal leakage (37.56 ± 1.25 nm) and lowest SBS (7.93 ± 1.03 MPa). However, samples in Group 2 conditioned with IP6 presented the lowest dye penetration score (11.23 ± 1.22 nm) and highest bond strength scores (11.12 ± 0.82 MPa). Conclusions: IP6 and ECYL have proved to be better alternatives in terms of low microleakage and improved SBS scores to PAA as a primary dentin surface conditioner for bonding RMGIC restoration. Conversely, MB-PDT, when employed as a dentin surface conditioner for RMGIC restorations, exhibited suboptimal results, characterized by elevated microleakage and compromised bond strength.

亚甲基蓝活化光动力疗法、植酸和Er,Cr:YSGG对树脂改性玻璃离子水泥的调节作用与常规聚丙烯酸的比较。
目的:表面调节剂植酸(IP6) Er,Cr:YSGG激光(ECYL)亚甲基蓝光动力治疗(MB-PDT)对树脂改性玻璃离子水泥(RMGIC)对初级健全牙本质的微渗漏和剪切结合强度(SBS)的影响。材料与方法:收集80颗拔除的健康初磨牙,将其浸泡在自固化丙烯酸树脂中。牙本质表面暴露平整,根据表面调理情况分为4组。第一组:聚丙烯酸(PAA),第二组:1% IP6,第三组:ECYL,第四组:MB-PDT。RMGIC修复材料与初级牙本质结合。用硝酸银进行边际泄漏评价。使用通用试验机和体视显微镜进行SBS和失效模式评估。采用方差分析和Tukey事后检验的多重比较,比较SBS和边际渗漏的均值和标准差(p < 0.05)。结果:MB-PDT处理后的标本边缘渗漏值最高(37.56±1.25 nm), SBS最小(7.93±1.03 MPa)。而在IP6条件下,第2组样品的染料渗透评分最低(11.23±1.22 nm),结合强度评分最高(11.12±0.82 MPa)。结论:IP6和ECYL在低微渗漏和提高SBS评分方面优于PAA作为初级牙本质表面调节剂用于粘接RMGIC修复。相反,当将MB-PDT用作RMGIC修复的牙本质表面调节剂时,表现出不理想的结果,其特点是微渗漏增加和粘结强度降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery Editor-in-Chief: Michael R Hamblin, PhD Co-Editor-in-Chief: Heidi Abrahamse, PhD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信