Multivariate Analysis of the Influence of Primary and Secondary Stability in Relation to Dental Implant Characteristics: A Clinical Study of 445 Implants.

Fabián Pérez-González, Santiago Bazal-Bonelli, Luis Sánchez-Labrador, Luis Miguel Sáez-Alcaide, Héctor González-Menéndez, Carlos Obo-Vázquez, Jorge Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann
{"title":"Multivariate Analysis of the Influence of Primary and Secondary Stability in Relation to Dental Implant Characteristics: A Clinical Study of 445 Implants.","authors":"Fabián Pérez-González, Santiago Bazal-Bonelli, Luis Sánchez-Labrador, Luis Miguel Sáez-Alcaide, Héctor González-Menéndez, Carlos Obo-Vázquez, Jorge Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Implant stability (IS) is crucial to the success of any implant-based therapy. The present work aimed to determine the relationship between primary and secondary stability and a range of variables.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included a total of 169 patients, who received 445 dental implants. A case history for each participant was created. Data collection included each patient's age, implant design, length and diameter, bone type, and surgical factors. Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) values were measured at baseline (T0: primary stability) and T1 (secondary stability). To calculate the ISQ values at T0, T1 and their differences in the variables age, design, length and diameter, a multivariate ANOVA test was performed to determine which variables acted as confounding factors and to adjust the ISQ values to these variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main variables age, design, length and diameter were adjusted to their confounding factors. Regarding primary (T0) and secondary (T1) stability, statistically significant differences (p<0.05) were only found in implant diameter, with the larger the diameter, the greater the stability. In all the other main variables, no statistically significant differences were found for primary and secondary stability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It may be concluded, within the limitations of the study, that the implant diameter variable is the one that significantly affects the primary and secondary stability of the implant.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Implant stability (IS) is crucial to the success of any implant-based therapy. The present work aimed to determine the relationship between primary and secondary stability and a range of variables.

Material and methods: This retrospective cohort study included a total of 169 patients, who received 445 dental implants. A case history for each participant was created. Data collection included each patient's age, implant design, length and diameter, bone type, and surgical factors. Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) values were measured at baseline (T0: primary stability) and T1 (secondary stability). To calculate the ISQ values at T0, T1 and their differences in the variables age, design, length and diameter, a multivariate ANOVA test was performed to determine which variables acted as confounding factors and to adjust the ISQ values to these variables.

Results: The main variables age, design, length and diameter were adjusted to their confounding factors. Regarding primary (T0) and secondary (T1) stability, statistically significant differences (p<0.05) were only found in implant diameter, with the larger the diameter, the greater the stability. In all the other main variables, no statistically significant differences were found for primary and secondary stability.

Conclusions: It may be concluded, within the limitations of the study, that the implant diameter variable is the one that significantly affects the primary and secondary stability of the implant.

445颗种植体的临床研究:初级和次级稳定性对种植体特性影响的多变量分析。
目的:种植体稳定性(IS)是任何种植体治疗成功的关键。本工作旨在确定主要和次要稳定性和一系列变量之间的关系。材料和方法:本回顾性队列研究共纳入169例患者,共445例种植体。为每个参与者创建了一个病例历史。数据收集包括每位患者的年龄、种植体设计、长度和直径、骨类型和手术因素。在基线(T0:主要稳定性)和T1(次要稳定性)时测量种植体稳定商(ISQ)值。为了计算T0, T1时的ISQ值及其在年龄,设计,长度和直径变量中的差异,进行了多变量方差分析,以确定哪些变量是混杂因素,并根据这些变量调整ISQ值。结果:主要变量年龄、设计、长度和直径调整为其混杂因素。初级(T0)和次级(T1)稳定性差异有统计学意义(p)结论:在研究范围内,可以得出结论,种植体直径变量是影响种植体初级和次级稳定性的显著变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信