Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Single-Unit Implant- Supported Restorations: A 12-Month Cross-Sectional Clinical Study.

Nur Pektaş, Özer İşisağ
{"title":"Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Single-Unit Implant- Supported Restorations: A 12-Month Cross-Sectional Clinical Study.","authors":"Nur Pektaş, Özer İşisağ","doi":"10.11607/jomi.11233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This retrospective clinical study aims to analyze single-unit implant-supported restorations' clinical and radiographic outcomes comprehensively.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, patients who had undergone 12 months of implant-supported singleunit fixed prosthetic treatment were scanned from the archives, and a hundred patients were included in the study. Implant success and survival rates were assessed according to the consensus decisions published at the International Oral Implantology Congress in 2007. Prosthetic complications such as chipping, screw loosening, and decementation were also evaluated. In addition, success/survival rates and prosthetic compositions were associated with some surgical and prosthetic parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the success/survival criteria, 88% of the implants were successful, 10% had satisfactory survival, and 2% had compromised survival. The risk of satisfactory or compromised survival was 62.5 times higher in individuals with inadequately keratinized mucosa compared to those with adequately keratinized mucosa (p < 0.001). It was also 5.736 times greater for extractions due to periodontal disease versus endodontic reasons (p = 0.010) and 4.629 times higher for implants with diameters less than 3.75 mm compared to those between 3.75 mm and 5 mm (p = 0.037). Screw loosening was observed in 15% of the evaluated restorations, decementation in 13% and chipping in 4%, and the risk of screw loosening was 4.444 times higher for screw retention abutments compared to standard abutments (p=0.015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Insufficient keratinized mucosa, periodontal problems leading to tooth extractions, and the use of narrowdiameter implants can negatively affect the success of implant procedures. Loosening in screw-retained restorations is due solely to screw loosening, which is a high risk for screwretained restorations. Loosening in cement-retained restorations, on the other hand, is caused by the decementation of the prosthetic restoration or loosening of the abutment screw supporting the restoration.</p>","PeriodicalId":94230,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.11233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This retrospective clinical study aims to analyze single-unit implant-supported restorations' clinical and radiographic outcomes comprehensively.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, patients who had undergone 12 months of implant-supported singleunit fixed prosthetic treatment were scanned from the archives, and a hundred patients were included in the study. Implant success and survival rates were assessed according to the consensus decisions published at the International Oral Implantology Congress in 2007. Prosthetic complications such as chipping, screw loosening, and decementation were also evaluated. In addition, success/survival rates and prosthetic compositions were associated with some surgical and prosthetic parameters.

Results: According to the success/survival criteria, 88% of the implants were successful, 10% had satisfactory survival, and 2% had compromised survival. The risk of satisfactory or compromised survival was 62.5 times higher in individuals with inadequately keratinized mucosa compared to those with adequately keratinized mucosa (p < 0.001). It was also 5.736 times greater for extractions due to periodontal disease versus endodontic reasons (p = 0.010) and 4.629 times higher for implants with diameters less than 3.75 mm compared to those between 3.75 mm and 5 mm (p = 0.037). Screw loosening was observed in 15% of the evaluated restorations, decementation in 13% and chipping in 4%, and the risk of screw loosening was 4.444 times higher for screw retention abutments compared to standard abutments (p=0.015).

Conclusion: Insufficient keratinized mucosa, periodontal problems leading to tooth extractions, and the use of narrowdiameter implants can negatively affect the success of implant procedures. Loosening in screw-retained restorations is due solely to screw loosening, which is a high risk for screwretained restorations. Loosening in cement-retained restorations, on the other hand, is caused by the decementation of the prosthetic restoration or loosening of the abutment screw supporting the restoration.

单单元种植体支撑修复体的临床和影像学结果:一项为期12个月的横断面临床研究。
目的:本回顾性临床研究旨在全面分析单单元种植体支持修复体的临床和影像学结果。材料和方法:本回顾性研究从档案中扫描接受过12个月种植体支持单单元固定假体治疗的患者,共纳入100例患者。根据2007年国际口腔种植大会发表的共识决定评估种植成功率和存活率。假体并发症如脱落、螺钉松动和复位也进行了评估。此外,成功/存活率和假体成分与一些手术和假体参数相关。结果:根据成功/生存标准,88%的种植体成功,10%的种植体生存满意,2%的种植体生存受损。与角化黏膜充分者相比,角化黏膜不充分者生存期满意或受损的风险高62.5倍(p < 0.001)。因牙周病而拔牙比因牙髓病而拔牙多5.736倍(p = 0.010),直径小于3.75 mm比直径在3.75 mm到5 mm之间多4.629倍(p = 0.037)。评估的修复体中有15%发生螺钉松动,13%发生退化,4%发生碎裂,螺钉保留基台发生螺钉松动的风险是标准基台的4.444倍(p=0.015)。结论:黏膜角化不充分、牙周问题导致拔牙以及使用窄径种植体会对种植手术的成功产生负面影响。螺钉保留的修复体松动仅仅是由于螺钉松动,这对螺钉保留的修复体来说是高风险的。另一方面,骨水泥保留修复体的松动是由假体修复体的退化或支撑修复体的基台螺钉松动引起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信